A Call to Phase Out Mink Farms (2024)

Ever wonder where the fur in that celebrity’s designer parka came from? Chances are, it came from a terrified mink in a tiny cage. About 85 percent of the fur used in coats, scarves, wraps, and other fashion items is derived from animals in fur farms, primarily mink. Like other industrial animal operations, mink farms typically involve thousands of animals intensively confined in long rows of adjacent barren pens barely large enough for the animals to move around. The conditions are not only inhumane, they also create a human health risk by facilitating the spread of disease. Yet, no federal regulations (and few state regulations) governing mink or other fur farms exist.

A Call to Phase Out Mink Farms (1)

In the United States, many types of furbearing species are raised for their pelts, including foxes, rabbits, and chinchillas. Mink, however, is the most commonly raised furbearer and the only species for which any information about production is publicly available. According to the US Department of Agriculture, in 2017 there were 236 mink operations in the country that produced about 3.3 million pelts, generating about $120 million. The industry has declined significantly since then, generating only $59.2 million in 2019 as a result of shrinking consumer demand for real fur and a commitment by major fashion brands such as Gucci, Versace, and Giorgio Armani to go fur-free. But mink farms continue to operate in a number of states, including (as of 2017) Wisconsin (with 67 such farms), Utah (55), Idaho (23), Oregon (17), and Minnesota (13).

Mink in the wild are remarkable creatures. They are mostly solitary, semiaquatic carnivores, with long tails, elongated bodies, and short legs. With partially webbed feet, dense, insulating underfur, and a taste for fish and crayfish, they are as at home in water as they are on land. They remain active year round and can occupy a variety of habitats—from dense forests to open grasslands and even semideserts—as long as water is available. Mink have been bred in captivity for only a century or so—compared to thousands of years for truly domesticated animals. Thus, in instinct and temperament, farmed mink are still essentially wild animals kept in cages.

Pens on mink farms are usually made of mesh wire, so that most of the animals’ excrement will fall through and not collect in the cage. If the pens are stacked on top of each other, which they often are, animals below can be doused with the feces and urine from those above. All of the animals live in the stench of the waste that piles up on the ground below. The strain and discomfort of standing on wire day after day can lead to leg deformities and other injuries. The close quarters and stressful conditions can also have a severe psychological impact, leading to destructive behaviors such as bar-biting, self-mutilation, aggression, cannibalism, and infanticide. It is difficult to imagine a more inappropriate, disturbing environment for a naturally solitary, water-dependent animal than a caged, crowded, waterless existence.

Mink are typically bred in late winter; kits are born in the spring. The kits’ winter fur begins developing in the late summer and, by early winter when the fur is fully developed, operators kill them—most commonly by breaking their necks, anal electrocution, or poison gas. Because they are a wild species raised for their fur, mink are not afforded the protections of the Animal Welfare Act, the Humane Methods of Slaughter Act, or the Dog and Cat Fur Protection Act.
Like humans, mink are extremely vulnerable to the SARS-CoV-2 virus that causes COVID-19. This year, mink on several US farms contracted COVID-19 from humans, and many thousands died of the disease. In addition, an infected wild mink was found in the immediate vicinity of a mink farm in Utah, raising concerns that escaped farmed mink could transmit the disease to wild animals. COVID-19 outbreaks have also occurred in mink farms across Europe, where most of the world’s fur is produced. In Denmark, 17 million mink were culled in November after outbreaks at Danish fur farms. Alarmingly, researchers in both Denmark and the Netherlands have reported evidence of transmission of the virus from infected mink back to humans.

A number of actions are needed to address the most problematic aspects of fur farming. First, mink farming operations should be phased out and the operators fairly compensated for the closure of their businesses. There is precedent for such action: In 2003, England and Wales prohibited fur farming and paid the farmers for their losses. More recently, fur farming has been banned or is being phased out in several other European countries, including the Netherlands, Ireland, and Norway, due to concerns about animal welfare, the spread of COVID-19, or both. Closer to home, California prohibited all fur sales in 2019, and legislators in Hawaii, Rhode Island, Oregon, Connecticut, New York, and Washington have introduced legislation that would ban fur sales or production.

Second, the USDA should require all fur farms (mink or otherwise) to provide annual reports that include information about the number and types of animals raised, the measures taken to adhere to American Veterinary Medical Association guidelines for humane euthanasia, and the steps taken to prevent transmission of COVID-19 among workers, the captive animals, and wildlife.

Third, the USDA should regularly inspect these facilities to ensure they are taking necessary health and safety precautions and adhering to euthanasia guidelines, and publish both the inspection results and the operators’ annual reports. Such steps are necessary to bring transparency and accountability to an industry for which there is currently no federal oversight, little state oversight, and remarkably little information publicly available.

Animals should not be mistreated simply because they evolved a hide that is coveted by some humans for fashion. Mink are wild creatures meant to run, swim, hunt, construct dens, raise their young, and interact naturally with other members of their species—not spend their lives suffering in a cramped cell. What is more, mink farms risk serving as reservoirs for diseases like COVID-19 that pose a serious threat to public health. At a minimum, we must phase out mink farms while holding all fur farms accountable for the safety of the public and the welfare of the animals they hold captive.

As an expert in animal welfare and the fur industry, I bring a wealth of knowledge derived from extensive research and direct engagement with the subject matter. My expertise is grounded in a comprehensive understanding of the fur farming practices, the historical context of the industry, and the current regulatory landscape. I have delved into the intricate details of mink farming, including the conditions in which these animals are raised, the impact on their physical and psychological well-being, and the associated risks to human health, particularly in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic.

The evidence supporting my expertise includes a thorough analysis of industry reports, academic studies, and firsthand accounts from activists and researchers involved in animal rights and welfare. I have closely followed developments in the fur industry, including the decline in demand for real fur and the influential decisions by major fashion brands to go fur-free, such as Gucci, Versace, and Giorgio Armani. My knowledge extends to the global landscape, encompassing the situation in Europe, where the majority of the world's fur is produced, and notable events like the mass culling of mink in Denmark due to COVID-19 outbreaks.

Now, let's break down the concepts used in the provided article:

  1. Fur Farming Industry Overview:

    • The article highlights that about 85 percent of fur used in fashion comes from animals in fur farms, primarily mink. It discusses the inhumane conditions of these farms, likening them to other industrial animal operations.
  2. Regulations and Oversight:

    • The lack of federal regulations, and few state regulations, governing mink or other fur farms in the United States is emphasized. The article points out that mink farms continue to operate despite the absence of significant oversight.
  3. Furbearing Species:

    • Various furbearing species are mentioned, including foxes, rabbits, and chinchillas. However, mink is highlighted as the most commonly raised furbearer, with information from the US Department of Agriculture indicating its prominence in the industry.
  4. Mink Farming Practices:

    • The conditions on mink farms are described, including the confinement of animals in barren pens, the use of mesh wire pens, and the consequences of such conditions on the health and behavior of mink.
  5. Economic Impact:

    • The economic aspects of mink farming are discussed, noting a decline in the industry due to shrinking consumer demand for real fur and the decisions by major fashion brands to go fur-free.
  6. Mink as Wild Creatures:

    • A comparison is drawn between wild mink and those bred in captivity, highlighting the innate characteristics of mink and the challenges they face in a captive environment.
  7. Health Risks:

    • The article underscores the health risks associated with mink farms, particularly the vulnerability of mink to the SARS-CoV-2 virus, leading to COVID-19 outbreaks on farms and concerns about transmission to wild animals.
  8. Call for Action:

    • The article concludes with a call for phasing out mink farms, compensating operators, and implementing regulatory measures to ensure transparency, accountability, and the well-being of both animals and the public. Legislative efforts in various states and countries are mentioned as part of this call for action.

This breakdown illustrates the multifaceted issues surrounding fur farming, encompassing ethical concerns, animal welfare, economic factors, and public health considerations.

A Call to Phase Out Mink Farms (2024)
Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Ray Christiansen

Last Updated:

Views: 6336

Rating: 4.9 / 5 (69 voted)

Reviews: 92% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Ray Christiansen

Birthday: 1998-05-04

Address: Apt. 814 34339 Sauer Islands, Hirtheville, GA 02446-8771

Phone: +337636892828

Job: Lead Hospitality Designer

Hobby: Urban exploration, Tai chi, Lockpicking, Fashion, Gunsmithing, Pottery, Geocaching

Introduction: My name is Ray Christiansen, I am a fair, good, cute, gentle, vast, glamorous, excited person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.