An 8 year study of risk factors for SIDS: bed‐sharing versus non‐bed‐sharing (2024)

Abstract

Keywords: bed‐sharing, birth weight, maternal smoking, overheating, SIDS, sudden infant death syndrome

Epidemiological studies indicating some forms of infant‐parent co‐sleeping as a risk factor for sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) have initiated much debate as to whether or not it is safe for babies to co‐sleep with adults in adult beds.^1,2,3,4,5,6 While there is agreement regarding the dangers of co‐sleeping on sofas and armchairs, details regarding the risks and/or benefits of bed‐sharing remain unclear. Variations in the use and interpretation of terminology and definitions for bed‐sharing (infant sharing an adult bed) and co‐sleeping (which may refer to sharing any type of sleep surface or simply room sharing without bed‐sharing) add to the confusion. The practice of bed‐sharing is increasing in some countries and in Ireland, where the SIDS rate is currently 0.7 per 1000 live births, a large proportion of SIDS cases every year occur while the infant is sharing a sleep surface with an adult(s), highlighting the need for further investigation of this issue.^6,7,8

Thermal stress is a known risk factor for SIDS and is thought to be one mechanism by which bed‐sharing may put infants at increased risk, particularly if the infants are sleeping prone.^9,10,11,12 Other factors associated with bed‐sharing include the additional body heat of adjacent adults sharing the bed, the possibility of the infants' head covering with bedding, and use of soft bedding. These factors might contribute to an increased risk of SIDS through overheating or rebreathing of expired air.^{9,10,13,14,15,16} Several studies have indicated that the associated risk applies only to younger babies and babies whose parents smoke.^1,3,4,5 However, recent studies have shown that even among non‐smokers, bed‐sharing increases the SIDS risk in younger infants, suggesting that all forms of bed‐sharing should be avoided for these infants.^17,18 In countries with low SIDS rates where bed‐sharing is the common method of sleeping arrangement, maternal smoking rates are also low and sleep surfaces are firm.¹⁹ In general, it is agreed that bed‐sharing should be avoided if parents are smokers, have consumed alcohol or other drugs, or are ill or excessively tired. So while there are some situations where bed‐sharing is clearly dangerous, whether bed‐sharing per se poses a risk remains to be determined.

Previous investigations from our group demonstrated that infants who are placed back in their own cots/beds to sleep or are ⩾20 weeks of age are not at increased risk.¹ This would indicate that temporary bed‐sharing for the purpose of feeding, for example, does not bring added risk. We also found that the risk associated with co‐sleeping was influenced by maternal smoking status. However, a limitation of this analysis was that a distinction was not made between infants co‐sleeping on couches or armchairs and those co‐sleeping in beds. Co‐sleeping on sofas is considered a particularly dangerous practice and should be excluded from analyses aiming to establish whether there are risks associated specifically with bed‐sharing. The current study is an extension of our previous work, includes additional data for the years 1999–2001, and has enabled us to conduct a more detailed examination of the profile of risk factors for SIDS among both bed‐sharing infants and those sleeping in cots.

Methodology

This study was part of an ongoing, nationwide case control study of SIDS in the Republic of Ireland. The National SIDS Register is notified of all sudden unexpected deaths in infancy (SUDI) in Ireland and all cases occurring between the 1st January 1994 and 31st December, 2001 with “SIDS” as the certified cause of death were included in the study. Controls were selected randomly for each case from the birth register and matched for date of birth and the same community care area as the index case. Both case and control families were invited by letter to participate in a home interview which was conducted within 6 weeks of the index case's death. A detailed account of recruitment and interview processes has previously been described by Matthews et al.²⁰ The study was approved by the Department of Health and Children and informed consent obtained from parents.

The average age of cases at time of death was 16.4 weeks and average age of control infants at interview was 21.8 weeks. Univariate analysis of variables related to the infants' last sleep was adjusted for this age difference. All multivariate analysis included a social disadvantage index, scoring 0–5 (5, most disadvantaged) as described previously.²⁰ A variable was created for z scores of weight by gestation (multiples of standard deviations from the normal mean) by relating the birth weight of each baby to controls of similar gestation. These scores were adjusted for the effects of gender and parity on birth weight.²¹ The variable “parental alcohol consumption in last sleep” referred to any quantity of alcohol, and “history of illness since birth” referred to any symptoms or illness experienced by the infant during his/her lifetime. A continuous variable for “combined tog value of infant clothing and bedding during the last sleep period” was modified to derive a binary variable where 0 = tog <10 and 1 = tog ⩾10. The variable “co‐sleeping during the last sleep” was defined as any shared sleeping arrangement of an infant with an adult in or on a bed/sofa/armchair, while “bed‐sharing” refers to infants sharing an adult bed with one or more adults. Infants who were room‐sharing but not bed‐ or sofa‐sharing were not included in the definition for co‐sleeping.

Statistical analysis of data was conducted using Stata 8. The data were analysed by multiple conditional logistic regression allowing for matching and differences between cases and controls were expressed using odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals. Effect modifiers of “bed‐sharing” were identified by examining interactions of the variable “infant found bed‐sharing with adult(s)” with other variables studied. Mean values for continuous variables were compared using t tests and one way analysis of variance. Differences in distribution of risk factors between cases and controls were estimated using χ² analysis. The population attributable risk for bed‐sharing, adjusted for other variables in the multivariate model, was calculated as described by Bruzzi et al.²²

Results

During the time period of the study, 332 cases of SIDS were reported to the register and of these, a total of 287 families agreed to participate in the study, corresponding to a response rate of 86%. The response rate for control families was also 86% (831/966). Information on co‐sleeping status during the last sleep period was available for 260 SIDS cases and 829 controls.

A total of 49% of SIDS infants were found while bed‐sharing with an adult(s), in comparison with 12% of control infants bed‐sharing during a corresponding reference sleep (table 1​1).). An additional 4% of cases died while co‐sleeping with an adult on a sofa or armchair. An estimated 50% (64/127) of SIDS cases who were bed‐sharing on the night they died were unaccustomed to this type of sleeping arrangement.

Logistic regression analysis revealed an adjusted odds ratio (AOR) of 3.53 for bed‐sharing indicating a fourfold increase in the SIDS risk for infants who bed‐share. The estimated proportion attributable risk for the population was 37%. A comparison with non‐co‐sleeping infants revealed that the associated odds ratio was greater when the infant was found located between two adults than when found next to one adult (table 1​1).

SIDS cases found sharing a sleep surface were significantly younger than cases found sleeping in cots; 12.8 weeks (bed‐sharers) and 8.3 weeks (sofa‐sharers) v 21.0 weeks for infants not sharing a sleep surface (p<0.001). Categorisation of bed‐sharing infants by age resulted in an unadjusted OR (UOR) of 8.07 for bed‐sharing infants ⩽10 weeks of age and when adjusted for maternal smoking and social deprivation the OR remained statistically significant (table 1​1).). Infants older than 20 weeks were not at significant risk compared with non‐bed/sofa‐sharers.

Discussion

This study demonstrates a high prevalence of bed‐sharing among SIDS infants in the Irish population. More than half of all cases occurred while sharing a sleep surface with an adult(s), the majority of whom had mothers who smoked during pregnancy and half of whom were unaccustomed to this type of sleeping arrangement. The theoretical proportion of cases that may have been prevented if bed‐sharing was eliminated as a risk factor is 37%.

A primary objective of the study was the distinction of bed‐sharing from other types of co‐sleeping such as sofa‐sharing and statistical analysis of the data indicates that bed‐sharing increases the risk of SIDS by a factor of almost four, a figure similar to other published data on bed‐sharing.^5,17,18

The profile of bed‐sharing infants differed from that of non‐bed‐sharers with respect to a number of risk factors and the estimate of the associated risk was modified by maternal smoking status, the combined tog value of clothing and bedding used, and weight for gestation at birth. Additional interactions with variables for parental alcohol consumption, breastfeeding, and history of illness, also observed in our previous study, became non‐significant after adjustment in the multivariate analysis or when sofa‐sharers were removed from the analysis.

Bed‐sharing infants were significantly younger than non‐bed‐sharers, an observation also reported by others.^4,5,18 The OR for bed‐sharing was higher for younger infants and in keeping with our previous data was not significant for infants >20 weeks of age.¹ Initial reports stated that bed‐sharing increases the SIDS risk only for infants whose mothers smoke, whereas more recently studies have found an effect of bed‐sharing independent of maternal smoking status.^4,5,17,18 In our analysis the odds ratio for bed‐sharing was seven times greater for infants whose mothers smoked than for non‐smokers, although, as evident by the associated 95% CI (0.98 to 4.39), the UOR for bed‐sharing in the non‐smoking group was not quite statistically significant. However caution is required with the interpretation of these data as this was clearly a borderline case with a trend towards a risk and a statement of no effect for bed‐sharing among non‐smokers should not be made without further study.²³ When adjusted for maternal smoking, bed‐sharing infants ⩽10 weeks of age remained at greater risk of SIDS than non‐bed‐sharers. This is in keeping with the results of Carpenter et al who demonstrated that even among non‐smokers, bed‐sharing increased the risk of SIDS in younger infants suggesting that any form of bed‐sharing may be dangerous for younger infants.¹⁷ Unfortunately more precise analysis of the relationship between bed‐sharing and infant age among the non‐smoking population in this study was not possible due to the age difference between cases and controls at time of interview and the small number of non‐smokers in the bed‐sharing SIDS group. These results indicate that additional studies employing larger sample sizes are now warranted which will increase statistical power sufficiently to demonstrate confidently whether there is a significant effect of bed‐sharing for non‐smokers. The variance of our results with others reporting no interaction with smoking might be accounted for by variations in the study populations, for example, ethnicity, the definitions used for bed‐sharing and in the reference groups, and diagnostic criteria used.^15,18 Importantly, maternal smoking was found to be a risk factor regardless of bed‐sharing status, indicating that the risk associated with smoking is not mediated solely via bed‐sharing. The effects were greatly increased, however, when the infant was also bed‐sharing.

Bed‐sharing posed a greater risk for infants born with low birth weight for gestation and it is possible that the lower birth weight observed for bed‐sharing infants may account for at least some of the effects of maternal smoking since studies have shown that infants of smokers are more likely to be born prematurely and to be of low birth weight.^24,25 These babies may be more vulnerable and less capable of dealing with potential stressors associated with bed‐sharing.

Infants who bed‐shared had higher thermal insulation than non‐bed‐sharers. The higher tog value observed for bed‐sharers elevated the bed‐sharing risk by a factor of four. Furthermore, infants found between two adults were at greater risk than those found next to one adult. Excess thermal insulation from bedding while bed‐sharing has been reported previously and some, but not all, studies of overnight rectal temperatures have shown that bed‐sharers have significantly higher temperatures than infants sleeping alone.^11,26,27,28 However, a study of excess thermal insulation in healthy infants has shown that bed‐sharers are capable of maintaining adequate thermoregulation and normal core temperature suggesting that the risk might only apply to vulnerable infants exposed to other risk factors such as maternal smoking.²⁷ Unfortunately, we had insufficient data for assessment of the effect of head covering, another important factor in compromising thermoregulation which has been shown to be more common among bed‐sharers than non‐bed‐sharers.^9,27

Modification of the effect of bed‐sharing by these other factors, that is, increased tog values, number and proximity of adjacent adults, low birth weight, and maternal smoking, suggests that the increased risk from bed‐sharing may be mediated through other mechanisms such as overheating or hypoxia induced by rebreathing of expired parental air. These factors may exert stronger physiological demands on a vulnerable infant while bed‐sharing, similar to the way that they do when infants are sleeping prone.^{9,11,29,30,31}

We reported previously that more co‐sleeping (all surfaces) than non‐co‐sleeping infants were placed and found in the prone position.¹ Restricting the analysis to bed‐sharers only, we found that the proportion of cases found prone while bed‐sharing was significantly less than those found prone in cots, while no significant difference was found for control infants. It has been suggested that infants who bed‐share are less likely to be placed or found prone as a result of increased parental awareness from the close proximity of the infant while breastfeeding.^27,32,33 However, while bed‐sharing is associated with increased duration and prevalence of breastfeeding, there is no evidence to date that bed‐sharing reduces the risk of SIDS.^34,35,36 It remains to be determined whether bed‐sharing arrangements for the primary purpose of breastfeeding differ from other forms of bed‐sharing.

These results are not supportive of a protective role for bed‐sharing. They reiterate that at least some arrangements of infant‐parent bed‐sharing are unsafe and that factors associated with bed‐sharing increase the risk of SIDS for vulnerable infants. While it has not been demonstrated that bed‐sharing is a risk factor in itself, clearly it interacts with other risk factors to increase the associated risks even further.

Abbreviations

Footnotes

References