Antibiotic resistance and extended spectrum beta-lactamases: Types, epidemiology and treatment (2024)

As a library, NLM provides access to scientific literature. Inclusion in an NLM database does not imply endorsem*nt of, or agreement with, the contents by NLM or the National Institutes of Health.
Learn more: PMC Disclaimer | PMC Copyright Notice

Antibiotic resistance and extended spectrum beta-lactamases: Types, epidemiology and treatment (1)

Guide for authorsAbout this journalExplore this journalSaudi Journal of Biological Sciences

Saudi J Biol Sci. 2015 Jan; 22(1): 90–101.

Published online 2014 Aug 17. doi:10.1016/j.sjbs.2014.08.002

PMCID: PMC4281622

PMID: 25561890

Author information Article notes Copyright and License information PMC Disclaimer

Abstract

Antibiotic resistance is a problem of deep scientific concern both in hospital and community settings. Rapid detection in clinical laboratories is essential for the judicious recognition of antimicrobial resistant organisms. Production of extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBLs) is a significant resistance-mechanism that impedes the antimicrobial treatment of infections caused by Enterobacteriaceae and is a serious threat to the currently available antibiotic armory. ESBLs are classified into several groups according to their amino acid sequence hom*ology. Proper infection control practices and barriers are essential to prevent spread and outbreaks of ESBL producing bacteria. As bacteria have developed different strategies to counter the effects of antibiotics, the identification of the resistance mechanism may help in the discovery and design of new antimicrobial agents. The carbapenems are widely regarded as the drugs of choice for the treatment of severe infections caused by ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae, although comparative clinical trials are scarce. Hence, more expeditious diagnostic testing of ESBL-producing bacteria and the feasible modification of guidelines for community-onset bacteremia associated with different infections are prescribed.

Keywords: Antibiotics, Extended-spectrum β-lactamase, Enterobacteriaceae, Carbapenems, Amino acid, Antimicrobial agents

1. Introduction

Resistance of pathogenic organisms to countenance antibiotics has become a worldwide problem with serious consequences on the treatment of infectious diseases. The heightened use/misuse of antibiotics in human medicine, agriculture and veterinary is primarily contributing to the phenomenon. There is an alarming increase of antibiotic resistance in bacteria that cause either community infections or hospital acquired infections. Of particular interest are the multidrug resistant pathogens, e.g. Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Acinetobacter baumannii, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, penicillin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae, vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus, and extensively drug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Alekshun and Levy, 2007).

Beta-lactam antimicrobial agents exhibit the most common treatment for bacterial infections and continue to be the prominent cause of resistance to β-lactam antibiotics among Gram-negative bacteria worldwide. The persistent exposure of bacterial strains to a multitude of β-lactams has induced dynamic and continuous production and mutation of β-lactamases in these bacteria, expanding their activity even against the newly developed β-lactam antibiotics. These enzymes are known as extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBLs) (Pitout and Laupland, 2008; Paterson and Bonomo, 2005). Treatment of these multiple drug resistant organisms is a deep scientific concern. At the level of a wider geographic scale, the incidence of ESBL-producing organisms is difficult to resolve due to various reasons, difficulty in detecting ESBL production and inconsistencies in reporting (Steward et al., 2000). Recently, a significant increase in the incidents of ESBL-related infections has been observed throughout the globe (Rupinder et al., 2013; Abhijit et al., 2013; Majda et al., 2013; Meeta et al., 2013; Kritu et al., 2013; Fatemeh et al., 2012; Gupta, 2007).

2. How do antibiotics work?

There are five major modes of antibiotic mechanisms of activity and here are some examples.

2.1. Interference with cell wall synthesis

Beta-lactam antibiotics like penicillin and cephalosporin impede enzymes that are responsible for the formation of peptidoglycan layer (Benton et al., 2007).

2.2. Inhibition of protein synthesis

Oxazolidinones, the newest class of antibiotics, interact with the A site of the bacterial ribosome where they should interfere with the placement of the aminoacyl-tRNA. Tetracyclines interfere with protein synthesis by binding to 30S subunit of ribosome, thereby weakening the ribosome-tRNA interaction. Macrolides bind to the 50S ribosomal subunit and inhibit the elongation of nascent polypeptide chains. Chloramphenicol binds to the 50S ribosomal subunit blocking peptidyl transferase reaction. Aminoglycosides inhibit initiation of protein synthesis and bind to the 30S ribosomal subunit (Leach et al., 2007).

2.3. Interference with nucleic acid synthesis

Rifampicin interferes with a DNA-directed RNA polymerase. Quinolones inhibit DNA synthesis with interference of type II topoisomerase, DNA gyrase and type IV topoisomerase during replication cycle causing double strand break (Strohl, 1997).

2.4. Inhibition of a metabolic pathway

Sulfonamides (e.g. sulfamethoxazole) and trimethoprim each block the key steps in the folate synthesis, which is a cofactor in the biosynthesis of nucleotides, the building blocks of DNA and RNA (Strohl, 1997).

2.5. Disorganizing of the cell membrane

The primary site of action is the cytoplasmic membrane of Gram-positive bacteria, or the inner membrane of Gram-negative bacteria. It is hypothesized that polymyxins exert their inhibitory effects by increasing bacterial membrane permeability, causing leakage of bacterial content. The cyclic lipopeptide daptomycin displays rapid bactericidal activity by binding to the cytoplasmic membrane in a calcium-dependent manner and oligomerizing in the membrane, leading to an efflux of potassium from the bacterial cell and cell death (Straus and Hanco*ck, 2006). Antibiotic resistant versus antimicrobial activity mechanism is shown in Fig. 1.

Antibiotic resistance and extended spectrum beta-lactamases: Types, epidemiology and treatment (2)

Antibiotic resistance vs. antimicrobial activity mechanism.

3. Antibiotic resistance mechanism

Antibiotic resistance is the reduction in effectiveness of a drug such as an antimicrobial or an antineoplastic in curing a disease or condition. When the antibiotic is not intended to kill or inhibit a pathogen, then the term is equivalent to dosage failure or drug tolerance. More commonly, the term is used in the context of resistance that pathogens have “acquired”, that is, resistance has evolved. When an organism is resistant to more than one drug, it is said to be multidrug-resistant (Fisher and Mobashery, 2010). Bacterial strains may possess different types of resistant mechanisms which are shown in Fig. 2 and are explained as follows.

Antibiotic resistance and extended spectrum beta-lactamases: Types, epidemiology and treatment (3)

Biochemical and genetic aspects of antibiotic resistance mechanisms.

3.1. Antibiotic inactivation

3.1.1. By hydrolysis

Many antibiotics have chemical bonds such as amides and esters which are hydrolytically susceptible. Several enzymes are known to ruin antibiotic activity by targeting and cleaving these bonds. These enzymes can often be excreted. Extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBLs) mediate resistance to all penicillins, third generation cephalosporins (e.g. ceftazidime, cefotaxime, and ceftriaxone) and aztreonam, but not to cephamycins (cefoxitin and cefotetan) and carbapenems (Bonnet, 2004).

3.1.2. By redox process

The pathogenic bacteria infrequently exploited oxidation or reduction of antibiotics. However, there are a few examples of this strategy (Yang et al., 2004). One is the oxidation of tetracycline antibiotics by the TetX enzyme. Streptomyces virginiae, a producer of the type A streptogramin antibiotic virginiamycin M1, protects itself from its own antibiotic by reducing a critical ketone group to an alcohol at position 16.

3.2. Antibiotic inactivation by group transfer

The most diverse family of resistant enzymes is the group of transferases. These enzymes inactivate antibiotics (aminoglycosides, chloramphenicol, streptogramin, macrolides or rifampicin) by chemical substitution (adenylyl, phosphoryl or acetyl groups are added to the periphery of the antibiotic molecule). The modified antibiotics are impaired in their binding to a target. Chemical strategies include O-acetylation and N-acetylation (Blanchard, 2004; Schwarz et al., 2004), O-phosphorylation (Matsuoka and Sasaki, 2004), O-nucleotidylation (Brisson-Noel et al., 1988), O-ribosylation, O-glycosylation, and thiol transfer. These covalent modification strategies all require a co-substrate such as ATP, acetyl-CoA, NAD+, UDP-glucose, or glutathione for their activity and consequently these processes are restricted to the cytoplasm.

3.3. Antibiotic resistance via target modification

The second major resistance mechanism is the modification of the antibiotic target site so that the antibiotic is impotent to bind properly. However, it is possible for mutational changes to occur in the target that reduce susceptibility to inhibition while retaining cellular function (Spratt, 1994).

4. Genetics of antibiotic resistance

4.1. Antibiotic resistance via mutations

There is a substantial number of biochemical mechanisms of antibiotic resistance that are based on mutational events, like the mutations of the sequences of genes encoding the target of certain antibiotics (e.g. resistance to rifampicin and fluoroquinolones is caused by mutations in the genes encoding the targets of these molecules, RpoB and DNA-topoisomerases, respectively) (Ruiz, 2003). The variation in the expression of antibiotic uptake or of the efflux systems may also be modified by mutation (e.g. the reduced expression or absence of the OprD porin of Pseudomonas aeruginosa reduces the permeability of the cell wall to carbapenems) (Wolter et al., 2004).

4.2. Antibiotic resistance via horizontal gene transfer

A principal mechanism for the spread of antibiotic resistance is by horizontal transfer of genetic material. Antibiotic resistance genes may be transferred by different mechanisms of conjugation, transformation or transduction. Over the last 15years, β-lactamase enzymes that have an extended spectrum of activity (ESBL) against the majority of β-lactams, including cephalosporins but not carbapenemases, have evolved. One of these, CTX-M-15, initially found in E. coli but now found in other members of Enterobacteriaceae and frequently associated with a specific lineage, uropathogenic clone ST131 (Bush and Fisher, 2011; Woodford et al., 2011), has spread worldwide. It is often located on highly mobile IncFII plasmids and associated with mobile genetic element IS26. The risk of infection is particularly high in individuals in association with prolonged hospitalization, catheterization, nursing home residency, previous antibiotic treatment, underlying renal or liver pathology, and travel to high-risk areas (Nordmann et al., 2011).

5. ESBL definition and classification

There is no consensus of the precise definition of ESBLs. ESBLs are a group of enzymes that break down antibiotics belonging to the penicillin and cephalosporin groups and render them ineffective. ESBL has generally been defined as transmissible β-lactamases that can be inhibited by clavulanic acid, tazobactam or sulbactam, and which are encoded by genes that can be exchanged between bacteria. The currently most common genetic variant of ESBL is CTX-M (Paterson and Bonomo 2005; Walsh, 2003).

Beta-lactamases are commonly classified according to two general schemes: the Ambler molecular classification and the Bush–Jacoby–Medeiros functional classification (Bush et al., 1995; Ambler, 1980). The Ambler scheme classifies β-lactamases into four classes according to the protein hom*ology of enzymes. Beta-lactamases of class A, C, and D are serine β-lactamase and class B enzymes are metallo-β-lactamases. The Bush–Jacoby–Medeiros functional scheme is based on functional properties of enzymes, i.e. the substrate and inhibitor profiles.

5.1. SHV type

The SHV family of β-lactamases appears to be derived from Klebsiella spp. The progenitor of the SHV class of enzymes, SHV-1, is universally found in K. pneumoniae. In many strains of K. pneumoniae, the gene encoding SHV-1, or its apparent precursor, LEN-1, resides within the bacterial chromosome too; it may be that the gene for SHV-1 β-lactamase evolved as a chromosomal gene in Klebsiella and was later incorporated into a plasmid which has spread to other enterobacteria species. SHV-1 confers resistance to broad-spectrum penicillins such as ampicillin, tigecycline and piperacillin but not to the oxyimino substituted cephalosporins (Livermore, 1995). The SHV-1 β-lactamase is responsible for up to 20% of the plasmid-mediated ampicillin resistance in K. pneumoniae species (Tzouvelekis and Bonomo, 1999).

5.2. TEM type

TEM-1, first reported from an E. coli isolate in 1965, has substrate and inhibition profiles similar to those of SHV-1 (Datta and Kontomichalou, 1965). TEM-1 is capable of hydrolyzing penicillins and first generation cephalosporins but is unable to attack the oxyimino cephalosporin. The first TEM variant with increased activity against extended spectrum cephalosporins was TEM-3 (Soughakoff et al., 1988; Sirot et al., 1987). TEM-2 the first derivative of TEM-1, had a single amino acid substitution from the original β-lactamase (Barthelemy et al., 1985). This caused a shift in the isoelectric point from a pI of 5.4–5.6, but it did not change the substrate profile. TEM-3, originally reported in 1989, was the first TEM-type β-lactamase that displayed the ESBL phenotype (Soughakoff et al., 1988). In retrospect, TEM-3 may not have been the first TEM-type ESBL. Klebsiella oxytoca, harboring a plasmid carrying a gene encoding ceftazidime resistance, was first isolated in Liverpool, England, in 1982 (Du Bois et al., 1995). The responsible β-lactamase was what is now called TEM-12. Interestingly, the strain came from a neonatal unit which had been stricken by an outbreak of K. oxytoca producing TEM-1 (Du Bois et al., 1995). This is a good example of the emergence of ESBLs as a response to the selective pressure induced by extended-spectrum cephalosporins.

5.3. CTX type

A new family of β-lactamases that preferentially hydrolyzes cefotaxime has arisen. It has been found in isolates of Salmonella enterica serovar, Typhimurium, E. coli mainly and some other species of Enterobacteriaceae (Gazouli et al., 1998; Knothe et al., 1983). These are not very closely related to TEM or SHV β-lactamases (Tzouvelekis et al., 2000). In addition to the rapid hydrolysis of cefotaxime, another unique feature of these enzymes is that they are better inhibited by the β-lactamase inhibitor tazobactam than by sulbactam and clavulanate (Bradford et al., 1998; Ma et al., 1998).

CTX-M β-lactamases are found exclusively in the functional group 2 (Bush and Jacoby, 2010) and thought to originate from chromosomal ESBL genes found in Kluyvera spp. (Bush and Jacoby, 2012), an opportunistic pathogen of the Enterobacteriaceae found in the environment. The first CTX-M proteins were discovered in the late 1980s and today more than 100 variants have been sequenced (Bonnet, 2004). Based on their amino acid sequences, they can be divided into five groups (CTX-M group 1, 2, 8, 9, and 25) (Bonnet, 2004).

The origin of the CTX-M enzymes is different from that of TEM and SHV ESBLs. While SHV-ESBLs and TEM-ESBLs were generated by amino acid substitutions of their parent enzymes, CTX-M ESBLs were acquired by the horizontal gene transfer from other bacteria using genetic apparatuses such as conjugative plasmid or transposon. The gene sequences encoding CTX-M enzymes show a high similarity to those of β-lactamases of Kluyvera species. In addition, the gene sequences adjacent to the CTX-M genes of Enterobacteriaceae are also similar to those surrounding the β-lactamase genes on the chromosomes of Kluyvera species (Olson et al., 2005; Humeniuk et al., 2002; Poirel et al., 2002).

Kinetic studies have shown that the CTX-M-type β-lactamases hydrolyze cephalothin or cephaloridine better than benzyl penicillin and they preferentially hydrolyze cefotaxime over ceftazidime (Tzouvelekis et al., 2000; Bradford et al., 1998). Although there is some hydrolysis of ceftazidime by these enzymes, it is usually not enough to provide clinical resistance to organisms in which they reside. It has been suggested that the serine residue at position 237, which is present in all of the CTX-M enzymes, plays an important role in the extended-spectrum activity of the CTX-M-type β-lactamases (Tzouvelekis et al., 2000). Although it has been shown not to be essential, the Arg-276 residue lies in a position equivalent to Arg-244 in TEM- or SHV-type ESBLs, as suggested by molecular modeling, and may also play a role in the hydrolysis of oxyimino cephalosporins (Gazouli et al., 1998). Recent crystallographic data for the Toho-1 enzyme suggested that there was increased flexibility of the interacting β 3 strands and ω loop of this enzyme in comparison to other class A β-lactamases. Furthermore, the lack of hydrogen bonds in the vicinity of the ω loop could account for the extended-spectrum phenotype (Ibuka et al., 1999).

5.4. OXA type

The OXA-type β-lactamases are so named because of their oxacillin-hydrolyzing abilities. These β-lactamases are characterized by hydrolysis rates for cloxacillin and oxacillin greater than 50% as that for benzyl penicillin (Bush et al., 1995). They predominantly occur in P. aeruginosa (Weldhagen et al., 2003) but have been detected in many other Gram-negative bacteria. In fact, the most common OXA-type β-lactamase, OXA-1 has been found in 1–10% of E. coli isolates (Livermore, 1995). The OXA-type ESBLs were originally discovered in P. aeruginosa isolates from a single hospital in Ankara, Turkey. In France, a novel derivative of OXA-10 (numbered OXA-28) was found in a P. aeruginosa isolate (Poirel et al., 2001). A novel ESBL (OXA-18) and an extended-spectrum derivative of the narrow spectrum OXA-13 β-lactamase (numbered OXA-19) have also been discovered in France in P. aeruginosa isolates (Philippon et al., 1997). The evolution of ESBL OXA-type β-lactamases from parent enzymes with narrower spectra has many parallels with the evolution of SHV- and TEM-type ESBLs. Unfortunately there are very few epidemiologic data on the geographical spread of OXA-type ESBLs (Philippon et al., 1997).

5.5. PER type

The PER-type ESBLs share only around 25–27% hom*ology with known TEM- and SHV-type ESBLs (Bauernfeind et al., 1996). PER-1 β-lactamase efficiently hydrolyzes penicillins and cephalosporins and is susceptible to clavulanic acid inhibition. PER-1 was first detected in P. aeruginosa (Neuhauser et al., 2003), and later in S. enterica serovar Typhimurium and Acinetobacter isolates as well (Vahaboglu et al., 2001). In Turkey, as many as 46% of nosocomial isolates of Acinetobacter spp. and 11% of P. aeruginosa were found to produce PER-1 (Vahaboglu et al., 1997). PER-2, which shares 86% hom*ology to PER-1, has been detected in S. enterica serovar Typhimurium, E. coli, K. pneumoniae, Proteus mirabilis, and Vibrio cholerae O1 El Tor (Petroni et al., 2002).

5.6. GES type

GES-1 was initially described in a K. pneumoniae isolate from a neonatal patient just transferred to France from French Guiana (Poirel et al., 2000). GES-1 has hydrolytic activity against penicillins and extended-spectrum cephalosporins, but not against cephamycins or carbapenems, and is inhibited by β-lactamase inhibitors. These enzymatic properties resemble those of other class A ESBLs; thus, GES-1 was recognized as a member of ESBLs.

5.7. VEB-1, BES-1, and other ESBL type

Other unusual enzymes having ESBL have also been described (e.g. BES-1, CME-1, VE-B-1, PER, SFO-1, and GES-1) (Bradford, 2001). These novel enzymes are found infrequently, details of these enzymes are reviewed elsewhere (Naas et al., 2008).

6. Detection

Observation of organisms harboring ESBLs provides clinicians with helpful information. Treatment of infections caused by ESBL-producing organisms with extended-spectrum cephalosporins or aztreonam may result in treatment failure even when the causative organisms appear to be susceptible to these antimicrobial agents by routine susceptibility testing (Paterson and Bonomo, 2005; Paterson et al., 2001). Additionally, patients colonized or infected with ESBL-producing organism should be placed under contact precautions to avoid hospital transmission (Siegel et al., 2006). These benefits summon the detection of ESBL-producing organisms in clinical laboratories. Further, revision of cephalosporin breakpoints has been achieved by the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) and is under way by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) for better prediction of clinical outcome by MIC values (Kahlmeter, 2008). It is still controversial whether this revision might allow clinical laboratories to dispense with ESBL detection (Paterson and Bonomo, 2005; Kahlmeter, 2008).

6.1. Phenotypic detection

The US Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) and the UK Health Protection Agency (HPA) have published guidelines for ESBL detection in Enterobacteriaceae specifically for E. coli, Klebsiella spp., and Proteus spp. (CLSI, 2002; HPA, 2008). The HPA guidelines also include other species, such as Salmonella spp. These guidelines are based on the principle that most ESBLs hydrolyze third-generation cephalosporins although they are inhibited by clavulanate, and recommend initial screening with either 8mg/L (CLSI) or 1mg/L (HPA) of cefpodoxime, 1mg/L each of cefotaxime, ceftazidime, ceftriaxone, or aztreonam, followed by confirmatory tests (including the E-test ESBL strips) with both cefotaxime and ceftazidime in combination with clavulanate at a concentration of 4μg/mL. Automated systems that use similar detection principles have proved to be popular in clinical laboratories, especially those in North America and certain European countries (Spanu et al., 2006). If clinical laboratories adhere to the published guidelines for detecting ESBLs, the CLSI and HPA published methods show high sensitivity of up to 94% and specificity of 98% for detecting ESBLs in E. coli, Klebsiella spp. and Proteus spp. (Wiegand et al., 2007).

6.2. Genotypic detection

The determination of whether a specific ESBL present in a clinical isolate is related to TEM and SHV enzymes is a complicated process because point mutations around the active sites of the TEM and SHV sequences have led to amino acid changes that increase the spectrum of activity of the parent enzymes, such as in TEM1, TEM2, and SHV1 (Bradford, 2001). The molecular method commonly used is the PCR amplification of the blaTEM and blaSHV genes with oligonucleotide primers, followed by sequencing. Sequencing is essential to discriminate between the non-ESBL parent enzymes (e.g. TEM1, TEM2, or SHV1) and different variants of TEM or SHV ESBLs (e.g. TEM3, SHV2, etc.) (Bradford, 2001).

The PCR amplification of CTX-M-specific products without sequencing, in an isolate that produces an ESBL, usually provides sufficient evidence that a blaCTX-M gene is responsible for this phenotype. This is unlike TEM and SHV types of ESBLs. Several recent studies have described various molecular approaches for the rapid screening of ESBL-positive organisms for the presence of different blaCTX-M genes. This involved a PCR assay that used four sets of primers to amplify group specific CTX-M β-lactamase genes (Pitout et al., 2004), amplification of a universal DNA fragment specific for most of the different groups of CTX-M β lactamases (Batchelor et al., 2005), duplex PCR (Pitout et al., 2007), multiplex PCR (Woodford et al., 2006), real-time PCR (Birkett et al., 2007), pyrosequencing (Naas et al., 2007), and reverse-line hybridization (Ensor et al., 2007). Molecular techniques undoubtedly have the potential to play an essential part in the laboratory setting for the screening, tracking, and monitoring of the spread of large number of organisms producing CTX-M enzymes from the community and hospital settings in real time.

7. Epidemiology

The epidemiology of ESBLs is quite complicated. Initially, there are certain levels to consider: the wider geographical area, the country, the hospital, the community, and the host (in most cases a single patient or a healthy carrier). Moreover, these are bacteria (E. coli is more endemic, and K. pneumoniae is more epidemic) and their mobile genetic elements, usually plasmids. Additionally, there are various reservoirs, including the environment (e.g. soil and water), wild animals, farm animals, and pets. The final component entails transmission from food and water, and via direct or indirect contact (person to person) (Carattoli, 2008). The first ESBL to be identified was found in Germany in 1983, but it was in France in 1985 and in the United States at the end of the 1980s and the beginning of the 1990s that the initial nosocomial outbreaks occurred (Rice et al., 1990). Soon thereafter, it was discovered that many of the K. pneumoniae strains that caused nosocomial infections in France in the early 1990s were ESBL producers (Sirot et al., 1987).

From an international aspect, the use of antibiotics, especially broad-spectrum agents, is narrow in Sweden (Cars et al., 2001). Since February 2007, clinical laboratories are required to report all cases involving ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae strains to the Swedish Institute for Infectious Disease Control, and the number of such cases increased by 100% from 2008 to 2011 (SIIDC, 2012). In recent years, there have also been larger nosocomial outbreaks of clonally ESBL strains: one at a neonatal care unit with ESBL-related mortalities, a large outbreak in Uppsala involving K. pneumoniae with CTX-M-15, and in Kristiansand caused by a multi resistant CTX-M-15-producing E. coli strain (Alsterlund et al., 2009). According to data from the European Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance System (EARSS), 2.6% of E. coli and 1.7% of K. pneumoniae strains in Sweden were resistant to third-generation cephalosporins in 2010 (EARSS, 2011).

New TEM and the SHV enzymes are still emerging in Europe, and distinct epidemic clones have been found, for example Salmonella isolates with TEM-52 in Spain (Fernandez et al., 2006) and E. coli and K. pneumoniae isolates with SHV-12 in Italy (Perilli et al., 2011). Isolates with the CTX-M-9 group are common in Spain and strains with the CTX-M-3 enzymes have been described chiefly in Eastern Europe, although clones producing the CTX-M group 1 (including the CTX-M-15 type) are the most widespread throughout Europe (Coque et al., 2008a,b; Canton et al., 2008). Today, E. coli and the CTX-M enzymes are not uncommon in outpatients. Moreover, the resistance exhibited by K. pneumoniae has reached a higher level with emergence of carbapenemases such as OXA-48, which was first found in Turkey (Aktas et al., 2008).

Another investigation was conducted at a tertiary hospital in Nigeria, among the overall ESBL producing isolates, 35% being community origin and 65% from hospitals. The ESBL isolates showed high resistance to tetracycline, gentamicin, pefloxacin, ceftriaxone, cefuroxime, ciprofloxacin and Augmentin (Amoxicillin and clavulanic acid combination). Conjugation studies for Resistance plasmid transfer showed non-transference of resistance determinants between the ESBL transconjugants and recipient strains. Correspondingly, the plasmid curing studies revealed that the acridine orange could not affect a cure on the isolates as they still retained high resistance to the antibiotics after the treatment (Ruth et al., 2011).

A study conducted at the National Public health laboratory (NPHL), Kathmandu, Nepal reported that 31.57% of E. coli were confirmed as Extended Spectrum β-lactamase producers, these isolates further exhibited co-resistance to several antibiotics (Thakur et al., 2013).

In another research conducted at a tertiary hospital in Mwanza, Tanzania, the overall prevalence of ESBLs in all Gram-negative bacteria (377 clinical isolates) was 29%. The ESBL prevalence was 64% in K. pneumoniae but 24% in E. coli (Mshana et al., 2009). Dramatic figures were also obtained in a small study at an orphanage in Mali, where 63% of the adults and 100% of the children were found to carry ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae that showed extensive co-resistance to other antibiotics (Tande et al., 2009). Moreover, in Madagascar, Herindrainy et al. (2011) observed that 10% of non-hospitalized patients carried ESBLs, in the majority of the cases CTX-M-15, and these investigators also found that poverty was a significant risk factor for carriage. Fatemeh et al. found that 26.5% of E. coli and 43% of K. pneumonia were ESBL positive in their study conducted at the Imam Reza hospital of Mashhad, IR Iran. They indicated the high prevalence of ESBL producing Enterobacteriaceae family especially in inpatients (Fatemeh et al., 2012).

The overall data on ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae in the countries of the Middle East are extremely worrisome, and this region might indeed be one of the major epicenters of the global ESBL pandemic. Investigation conducted in that country showed that 61% of E. coli produced ESBLs of the CTX-M-14, CTX-M 15, and CTX-M 27 types, and all of strains harbored the TEM enzyme (Al-Agamy et al., 2006). In a study of inpatients in Saudi Arabia in 2008, Tawfik and colleagues found that 26% of K. pneumoniae isolates produced ESBLs, the majority of which were SHV-12 and TEM-1 enzymes, and 36% were CTX-M-15 (Tawfik et al., 2011). Another investigation conducted in the same country in 2004–2005 showed that 10% of clinical urinary E. coli isolates from inpatients and 4% of such isolates from outpatients were ESBL producers (Khanfar et al., 2009). Moubareck and colleagues analyzed fecal samples in Lebanon in 2003 and noted that ESBL carriage differed somewhat between patients (16%), healthcare workers (3%), and healthy subjects (2%), and also that there was a predominance of the CTX-M-15 enzyme (83%) (Moubareck et al., 2005). Other researchers in Lebanon (Khanfar et al., 2009) observed that the proportion of ESBL-producing isolates was significantly larger among inpatients (15.4%) than in outpatients (4.5%). Moreover, data collected over three years in Kuwait showed that the levels of ESBLs were lower in community isolates of K. pneumoniae (17%) and E. coli (12%) than in the corresponding hospital isolates (28% and 26%, respectively) (Al Benwan et al., 2010).

Only lately have we begun to understand the extent of the ecological disaster related to ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae in parts of Asia and the Indian subcontinent, and the number of reports of very high frequency of such bacteria in those regions continues to rise. It is likely that some of the successful ESBL-producing clones originate from Asia. Deficient sewage routines (the “Delhi belly”) and poor quality of drinking water, in combination with a lack of control over prescription and sales of antibiotics, are probably major factors that have promoted the development of resistance. The United Nations has estimated the population of Asia to be 4.2 billion in 2012, and hence it is a very challenging task to try to stop the growing resistance to antibiotic stemming from this part of the world as exemplified by the rapid spread of the carbapenemase NDM-1 (Kumarasamy et al., 2010). A few articles published as early as the end of the 1980s and the beginning of the 1990s have reported occurrence of the SHV-2 and Toho-1 (CTX-M-44) enzymes in China and Japan (Hawkey, 2008). According to the SENTRY surveillance program there have been rapid increase in ESBL-producing K. pneumoniae (up to 60%) and E. coli (13–35%) in different parts of China, with a predominance of the CTX-M-14 and CTX-M-3 enzymes (Hawkey, 2008; Hirakata et al., 2005). It has been found that 66% of third generation cephalosporin resistant E. coli and K. pneumoniae from three medical centers in India harbored the CTX-M-15 type of ESBL, which was also the only CTX-M enzyme found (Ensor et al., 2006), and an investigation of 10 other centers in that country showed that rates of ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae reached 70% (Mathai et al., 2002). Recently ESBL production was observed in 48% of E. coli, 44% of K. pneumoniae and 50% of P. aeruginosa isolates in a tertiary hospital in Patiala, Punjab (Rupinder et al., 2013). In other recent studies, authors observed ESBL rates of 46% and 50% in out- and inpatients, respectively (Sankar et al., 2012), and Nasa and co-workers detected ESBL production in almost 80% of clinical isolates (Nasa et al., 2012). Investigations from India and Pakistan show an alarming and rapid increase in the prevalence of Enterobacteriaceae with NDM-1 with prevalence rate from 6.9% in a hospital in Varanasi, India, to 18.5% in Rawalpindi, Pakistan (Perry et al., 2011) and perhaps the spread of these enzyme could be even more rapid than the spread of the CTX-M enzymes.

Majda et al. reported that 72% of E. coli and 65.8% of K. pneumoniae were ESBL producers at the Microbiology laboratory of Shalamar Medical College, Lahore. Sensitivity testing showed a multidrug resistance in ESBL producing E. coli and K. pneumoniae. Maximum resistance was recorded in E. coli (ESBL) as cefotaxime (98.9%), Ceftazidime (96.7%) and Cefuroxime (93.4%) while minimum resistance was seen with Imipenem (0.8%), fosfomycin (1.2%) and Nitrofurantoin as well piperacillin/tazobactam (2.2%) each. The ESBL producing Klebsiella showed maximum resistance to ceftazidime (100%), cefotaxime (89%), and Cefuroxime (84%) while minimum resistance was seen with imipenem (4%), Nitrofurantoin and Piperacillin/Tazobactam (8%) (Majda et al., 2013).

In a most recent study Shakti et al. reported 12.11% ESBL positive among ICU and NICU isolates and 22.47% ESBL positive from nosocomial isolates. The author further statically confirmed that ESBL strains were equally distributed in community or hospital units. Antibiogram of 23 antibiotics revealed progressive increase in drug resistance against each antibiotic with the maximum resistant values recorded against gentamycin: 92% and 79%, oxacillin: 94% and 69%, ceftriaxone: 85% and 58%, and Norfloxacin 97% and 69% resistance, in nosocomial and community isolates respectively (Shakti et al., 2014).

Although there are some differences between countries, the highest prevalence of ESBL-producing K. pneumoniae in the world is seen primarily in Latin America, data from 33 centers in Latin America collected over the period 2004–2007 within the Tigecycline Evaluation and Surveillance Trial (TEST) showed ESBLs in 36.7% of K. pneumoniae isolates and in 20.8% of 932 E. coli isolates (Rossi et al., 2008).

A large variety of different types of SHV have also been described. One extensive outbreak of Enterobacteriaceae producing the CTX-M-14 enzyme occurred in Calgary, Canada (Pitout et al., 2005). In a large study performed in 2001, it was demonstrated that about 5.3% of E. coli in the United States harbored ESBLs (Winokur et al., 2001), and an investigation conducted in 2009 showed that 9% of E. coli isolates at a cancer center in Texas were ESBL producers (Bhusal et al., 2011). Sanchez et al., investigated data obtained from The Surveillance Network (TSN) concerning in vitro antimicrobial resistance in US outpatients between 2000 and 2010, and their results showed that resistance to ceftriaxone rose from 0.2% to 2.3% and resistance to cefuroxime increased from 1.5% to 5%, but the bacterial isolates in focus were not tested for ESBLs (Sanchez et al., 2012). The epidemiology of ESBLs producing organism is shown in Table 1.

Table 1

Epidemiology of ESBL producing organisms.

S. No.ESBL producing organismsCountry/CityReferences
1E. coli, K. pneumoniaeSwedenAlsterlund et al. (2009)
2Salmonella spp.SpainFernandez et al. (2006)
3E. coli, K. pneumoniaeItalyPerilli et al. (2011)
4K. pneumoniaeTurkeyAktas et al. (2008)
5Enterobacteriaceae, P. aeruginosaNigeriaRuth et al. (2011)
6E. coliNepalThakur et al. (2013)
7E. coli, K. pneumoniaeTanzaniaMshana et al. (2009)
8E. coli, K. pneumoniaeIranFatemeh et al. (2012)
9E. coliMiddle EastAl-Agamy et al. (2006)
10E. coliSaudi ArabiaTawfik et al. (2011)
11K. pneumoniaeSaudi ArabiaKhanfar et al. (2009)
12E. coli, K. pneumoniaeLebanonMoubareck et al. (2005)
13E. coli, K. pneumoniaeKuwaitMoubareck et al. (2005)
14E. coli, K. pneumoniaeChinaHawkey (2008) and Hirakata et al. (2005)
15E. coli, K. pneumoniaeIndiaEnsor et al. (2006) and Nasa et al. (2012)
16E. coli, K. pneumoniaePunjabRupinder et al. (2013)
17E. coliOdishaShakti et al., 2014
18EnterobacteriaceaePakistanPerry et al. (2011)
19E. coli, K. pneumoniaeLahoreMajda et al. (2013)
20E. coli, K. pneumoniaeLatin AmericaRossi et al. (2008)
21EnterobacteriaceaeCanadaPitout et al. (2005)
22E. coliUnited StatesWinokur et al. (2001) and Sanchez et al. (2012)

8. Treatment

The carbapenems (imipenem, meropenem, ertapenem, doripenem) are still the first choice of treatment for serious infections with ESBL-producing E. coli and K. pneumoniae. It has been reported that>98% of the ESBL-producing E. coli, K. pneumoniae and P. mirabilis are still susceptible to these drugs (Perez et al., 2007). But with the emergence of the carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae, the “magic bullet” is actually difficult to find. There are some older drugs which can be used to treat the ESBL-producing E. coli or K. pneumoniae infections. Fosfomycin was reported of having admirable in vitro activity against the ESBL-producing E. coli or K. pneumoniae. In Hong Kong, most of the ESBL-producing E. coli isolates were reported to be sensitive to fosfomycin (Ho et al., 2010). Colistin is another choice which we can consider for the treatment of these organisms. Although once considered as quite a toxic antibiotic, it is a last resort that we can consider at the present moment as there is no new anti gram negative antibiotics available for the treatment of these multidrug resistant organisms. Other than ESBL-producing organisms, actually colistin is used in the treatment of multidrug resistant P. aeruginosa, carbapenem resistant A. baumannii. Close monitoring for the development of side effects can improve the safety margin when prescribing the drug. Tigecycline is also one of the drugs in the pipeline which can be considered for treatment (Perez et al., 2007).

9. Conclusion

The incidence of infections caused by beta-lactam-resistant organisms due to the production of various enzymes has increased in recent years. Detection of ESBL production is of paramount importance both in hospital and community isolates. Infection-control practitioners and clinicians need the clinical laboratory to rapidly identify and characterize different types of resistant bacteria. This in turn is required to minimize the spread of these bacteria and help select appropriate antibiotics. This is particularly true for ESBL-producing bacteria. The epidemiology of ESBL-producing bacteria is becoming more complex with increasingly blurred boundaries between hospitals and the community. The acquisition of efficient mobile elements has accelerated the transfer of various antibiotic resistance genes. Probably, a “super bug”, resistant to relatively all licensed antibiotics, may rise in the future. Constant and careful worldwide surveillance for multidrug-resistant bacteria is urgently warranted.

Conflicts of interest

None declared.

Acknowledgements

Shaikh S is supported by the INSPIRE grant from DST, New Delhi (Grant Number: IF130056), which is sincerely acknowledged. The authors extend sincere thanks to all of the staff of the Integral University, Lucknow, INDIA for co-operation.

Footnotes

Peer review under responsibility of King Saud University.

References

  • Abhijit A., Sunita N., Maria K. Study of urinary isolates with reference to extended spectrum beta lactamases detection and antibiogram. J. Evol. Med. Dent. Sci. 2013;2(9):1049–1055. [Google Scholar]
  • Aktas Z., Kayacan C.B., Schneider I., Can B., Midilli K., Bauernfeind A. Carbapenem hydrolyzing oxacillinase, OXA-48, persists in Klebsiella pneumoniae in Istanbul, Turkey. Chemotherapy. 2008;54(2):101–106. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Al Benwan K., Al Sweih N., Rotimi V.O. Etiology and antibiotic susceptibility patterns of community and hospital acquired urinary tract infections in a general hospital in Kuwait. Med. Princ. Pract. 2010;19(6):440–446. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Al-Agamy M.H. Mohamed, El-Din Ashour M.S., Wiegand I. First description of CTXM beta-lactamase-producing clinical Escherichia coli isolates from Egypt. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents. 2006;27(6):545–548. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Alekshun M.N., Levy S.B. Molecular mechanisms of antibacterial multidrug resistance. Cell. 2007;128:1037–1050. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Alsterlund R., Carlsson B., Gezelius L., Haeggman S., Olsson-Liljequist B. Multi resistant CTX-M-15 ESBL-producing Escherichia coli in southern Sweden: description of an outbreak. Scand. J. Infect. Dis. 2009;41(6–7):410–415. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Ambler R.P. The structure of β-lactamases. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B. Biol. Sci. 1980;289:321–331. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Barthelemy M., Péduzzi J., Labia R. Distinction entre les structures primaires des beta-lactamases TEM-1 et TEM-2. Ann. Inst. Pasteur. Microbiol. 1985;136(3):311–321. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Batchelor M., Hopkins K., Liebana E. blaCTX-M genes in clinical Salmonella isolates recovered from humans in England and Wales from 1992 to 2003. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2005;49(4):1319–1322. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Bauernfeind A., Stemplinger I., Jungwirth R., Ernst S., Casellas J.M. Sequences of β-lactamase genes encoding CTX-M-1 (MEN-1) and CTX-M-2 and relationship of their amino acid sequences with those of other β-lactamases. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 1996;40:509–513. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Benton B., Breukink E., Visscher I., Debabov D., Lunde C., Janc J., Mammen M., Humphrey P. Telavancin inhibits peptidoglycan biosynthesis through preferential targeting of transglycosylation: evidence for a multivalent interaction between telavancin and lipid II. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents. 2007;29:51–52. [Google Scholar]
  • Bhusal Y., Mihu C.N., Tarrand J.J., Rolston K.V. Incidence of fluoroquinolone-resistant and extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli at a comprehensive cancer center in the United States. Chemotherapy. 2011;57(4):335–338. (Biol. Sci. 289, 321-331) [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Birkett C.I., Ludlam H.A., Woodford N., Brown D.F., Brown N.M., Roberts M.T., Milner N., Curran M.D. Real-time TaqMan PCR for rapid detection and typing of genes encoding CTX-M extended-spectrum β-lactamases. J. Med. Microbiol. 2007;56:52–55. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Blanchard A. Bacterial acetyltransferase capable of regioselective N-acetylation of antibiotics and histones. Chem. Biol. 2004;11:565–573. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Bonnet R. Growing group of extended-spectrum beta-lactamases: the CTX-M enzymes. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2004;48(1):1–14. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Bradford P.A. Extended spectrum beta-lactamases in the 21st century: characterization, epidemiology and detection of this important resistance threat. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2001;14:933–951. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Bradford P.A., Yang Y., Sahm D., Grope I., Gardovska D., Storch G. CTX-M-5, a novel cefotaxime-hydrolyzing b-lactamase from an outbreak of Salmonella typhimurium in Latvia. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 1998;42:1890–1894. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Brisson-Noel A., Delrieu P., Samain D., Courvalin P. Inactivation of lincosaminide antibiotics in Staphylococcus: identification of lincosaminide O-nucleotidyltransferases and comparison of the corresponding resistance genes. J. Biol. Chem. 1988;263:15880–15887. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Bush K., Fisher J.F. Epidemiological expansion, structural studies, and clinical challenges of new β-lactamases from gram-negative bacteria. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 2011;65:455–478. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Bush K., Jacoby G.A. An updated functional classification of-lactamases. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2010;54(3):969–976. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Bush, K., Jacoby, G.A., Beta-lactamase classification and amino acid sequences for TEM, SHV and OXA extended-spectrum and inhibitor resistant enzymes. Available from: <http://www.lahey.org/Studies/> (accessed 27.10.2012).
  • Bush K., Jacoby G.A., Medeiros A.A. A functional classification scheme for beta-lactamases and its correlation with molecular structure. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 1995;39:1211–1233. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Canton R., Novais A., Valverde A., Machado E., Peixe L., Baquero F., Coque T.M. Prevalence and spread of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase producing Enterobacteriaceae in Europe. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2008;1:144–153. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Carattoli A. Animal reservoirs for extended spectrum beta-lactamase producers. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2008;1:117–123. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Cars O., Molstad S., Melander A. Variation in antibiotic use in the European Union. Lancet. 2001;357(9271):1851–1883. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Coque T.M., Baquero F., Canton R. Increasing prevalence of ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae in Europe. Euro. Surveill. 2008;13(47):1–11. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Coque T.M., Novais A., Carattoli A., Poirel L., Pitout J., Peixe L., Baquero F., Cantón R., Nordmann P. Dissemination of clonally related Escherichia coli strains expressing extended-spectrum beta-lactamase CTX-M-15. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2008;14(2):195–200. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Datta N., Kontomichalou P. Penicillinase synthesis controlled by infectious R factors in Enterobacteriaceae. Nature. 1965;208:239–241. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Du Bois S.K., Marriott M.S., Amyes S.G. TEM- and SHV-derived extended-spectrum beta-lactamases: relationship between selection, structure and function. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 1995;35:7–22. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Ensor V.M., Shahid M., Evans J.T., Hawkey P.M. Occurrence, prevalence and genetic environment of CTX-M beta-lactamases in Enterobacteriaceae from Indian hospitals. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2006;58(6):1260–1263. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Ensor V.M., Livermore D.M., Hawkey P.M. A novel reverse-line hybridization assay for identifying genotypes of CTX-M-type extended-spectrum β-lactamases. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2007;59:387–395. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • European Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance System, 2011. <http://www.rivm.nl/earss/database/> (accessed 16-09-2011).
  • Fatemeh A., Emran A., Elnaz K., Mohammad J.G.S., Mahboubeh N. The frequency of extended spectrum beta lactamase (ESBL) in Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumonia: a report from Mashhad, Iran. J. Med. Bacteriol. 2012;1(3):12–19. [Google Scholar]
  • Fernandez V.M., Munoz B.J.L., Garcia G.M.I., Garcia R.J.A. Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis producing a TEM-52 beta-lactamase: first report in Spain. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2006;55(3):245–256. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Fisher J.F., Mobashery S. vol. 8. Elsevier; 2010. Enzymology of Bacterial Resistance. Comprehensive Natural Products II; pp. 443–487. (Enzymes and Enzyme Mechanisms). [Google Scholar]
  • Gazouli M., Tzelepi E., Markogiannakis A., Legakis N.J., Tzouvelekis L.S. Two novel plasmid-mediated cefotaxime hydrolyzing b-lactamases (CTX-M-5 and CTX-M-6) from Salmonella typhimurium. FEMS. Microbiol. Lett. 1998;165:289–293. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Gupta V. An update on newer β-lactamases. Indian J. Med. Res. 2007;126(5):417–427. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Hawkey P.M. Prevalence and clonality of extended-spectrum beta-lactamases in Asia. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2008;14(1):159–165. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Herindrainy P., Randrianirina F., Ratovoson R., Ratsima H.E., Buisson Y., Genel N., Decré D., Arlet G., Talarmin A., Richard V. Rectal carriage of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing gram negative bacilli in community settings in Madagascar. PLoS ONE. 2011;6(7):e22738. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Hirakata Y., Matsuda J., Miyazaki Y., Kamihira S., Kawakami S., Miyazawa Y., Ono Y., Nakazaki N., Hirata Y., Inoue M., Turnidge J.D., Bell J.M., Jones R.N., Kohno S. Regional variation in the prevalence of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing clinical isolates in the Asia-Pacific region (SENTRY 1998–2002) Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2005;52(4):323–329. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Ho P.L., Yip K.S., Chow K.H., Lo J.Y., Que T.L., Yuen K.Y. Antimicrobial resistance among uropathogens that cause acute uncomplicated cystitis in women in Hong Kong: a prospective multicenter study in 2006 to 2008. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2010;66:87–93. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Humeniuk C., Arlet G., Gautier V., Grimont P., Labia R., Philippon A. β-lactamases of Kluyvera ascorbata, probable progenitors of some plasmid-encoded CTX-M types. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2002;46:3045–3049. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Ibuka A., Taguchi A., Ishiguro M., Fushinobu S., Ishii Y., Kamitori S., Okuyama K., Yamaguchi K., Konno M., Matsuzawa H. Crystal structure of the E166A mutant of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase Toho-1 at 1.8 A° resolution. J. Mol. Biol. 1999;285:2079–2087. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Kahlmeter G. Breakpoints for intravenously used cephalosporins in Enterobacteriaceae-EUCAST and CLSI breakpoints. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2008;14:169–174. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Khanfar H.S., Bindayna K.M., Senok A.C., Botta G.A. Extended spectrum beta lactamases (ESBL) in Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae: trends in the hospital and community settings. J. Infect. Dev. Ctries. 2009;3(4):295–299. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Knothe H., Shah P., Krcmery V., Antal M., Mitsuhashi S. Transferable resistance to cefotaxime, cefoxitin, cefamandole and cefuroxime in clinical isolates of Klebsiella pneumoniae and Serratia marcescens. Infection. 1983;11:315–317. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Kritu P., Prakash G., Shiba K.R., Reena K.M., RAM N.S., Ganesh R. Antibiogram typing of gram negative isolates in different clinical samples of a tertiary hospital. Asian J. Pharm. Clin. Res. 2013;6(1):153–156. [Google Scholar]
  • Kumarasamy K.K., Toleman M.A., Walsh T.R., Bagaria J., Butt F., Balakrishnan R., Chaudhary U., Doumith M., Giske C.G., Irfan S., Krishnan P., Kumar A.V., Maharjan S., Mushtaq S., Noorie T., Paterson D.L., Pearson A., Perry C., Pike R., Rao B., Ray U., Sarma J.B., Sharma M., Sheridan E., Thirunarayan M.A., Turton J., Upadhyay S., Warner M., Welfare W., Livermore D.M., Woodford N. Emergence of a new antibiotic resistance mechanism in India, Pakistan, and the UK: a molecular, biological, and epidemiological study. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2010;10(9):597–602. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Leach K.L., Swaney S.M., Colca J.R., McDonald W.G., Blinn J.R., Thomasco L.M., Gadwood R.C., Shinabarger D., Xiong L., Mankin A.S. The site of action of oxazolidinone antibiotics in living bacteria and in human mitochondria. Mol. Cell. 2007;26:393–402. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Livermore D.M. Beta-lactamases in laboratory and clinical resistance. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 1995;8:557–584. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Ma L., Ishii Y., Ishiguro M., Matsuzawa H., Yamaguchi K. Cloning and sequencing of the gene encoding Toho-2, a class A β-lactamase preferentially inhibited by tazobactam. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 1998;42:1181–1186. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Majda Q., Najma A., Summyia B. Evaluation of extended spectrum beta-lactamase mediated resistance in Escherichia coli and Klebsiella in urinary tract infection at a tertiary care hospital. Biomedica. 2013;29:78–81. [Google Scholar]
  • Mathai D., Rhomberg P.R., Biedenbach D.J., Jones R.N. Evaluation of the in vitro activity of six broad-spectrum beta-lactam antimicrobial agents tested against recent clinical isolates from India: a survey of ten medical center laboratories. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2002;44(4):367–377. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Matsuoka M., Sasaki T. Inactivation of macrolides by producers and pathogens. Curr. Drug Targets Infect. Disord. 2004;4:217–240. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Meeta S., Sati P., Preeti S. Prevalence and antibiogram of extended spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) producing Gram negative bacilli and further molecular characterization of ESBL producing Escherichia coli and Klebsiella spp. J. Clin. Diag. Res. 2013;7(10):2168–2172. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Moubareck C., Daoud Z., Hakime N.I., Hamze M., Mangeney N., Matta H., Mokhbat J.E., Rohban R., Sarkis D.K., Doucet-Populaire F. Countrywide spread of community- and hospital acquired extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (CTX-M-15)-producing Enterobacteriaceae in Lebanon. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2005;43(7):3309–3313. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Mshana S.E., Kamugisha E., Mirambo M., Chakraborty T., Lyamuya E.F. Prevalence of multi resistant gram-negative organisms in a tertiary hospital in Mwanza, Tanzania. BMC Res. Notes. 2009;26(2):49. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Naas T., Oxacelay C., Nordmann P. Identification of CTX-M-type extended spectrum-β-lactamase genes using real-time PCR and pyrosequencing. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2007;51:223–230. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Naas T., Poirel L., Nordmann P. Minor extended-spectrum β-lactamases. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2008;14(1):42–52. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Nasa P., Juneja D., Singh O., Dang R., Singh A. An observational study on bloodstream extended-spectrum beta-lactamase infection in critical care unit: incidence, risk factors and its impact on outcome. Eur. J. Intern. Med. 2012;23(2):192–195. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing. 12th informational supplement. M100–S12. Wayne, P.A., National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards, 2002.
  • Neuhauser M.M., Weinstein R.A., Rydman R., Danziger L.H., Karam G., Quinn J.P. Antibiotic resistance among gram-negative bacilli in US intensive care units: implications for fluoroquinolone use. JAMA. 2003;289:885–888. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Nordmann P., Poirel L., Walsh T.R., Livermore D.M. The emerging NDM carbapenemases. Trends Microbiol. 2011;19:588–595. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Olson A.B., Silverman M., Boyd D.A., McGeer A., Willey B.M., Pong-Porter V., Daneman Mulvey M.R. Identification of a progenitor of the CTX-M-9 group of extended-spectrum β-lactamases from Kluyvera georgiana isolated in Guyana. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2005;49:2112–2115. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Paterson D.L., Bonomo R.A. Extended-spectrum beta-lactamases: a clinical update. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2005;18:657–686. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Paterson D.L., Ko W.C., Von G.A., Casellas J.M., Mulazimoglu L., Klugman K.P., Bonomo R.A., Rice L.B., McCormack J.G., Yu V.L. Outcome of cephalosporin treatment for serious infections due to apparently susceptible organisms producing extended-spectrum β-lactamases: implications for the clinical microbiology laboratory. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2001;39:2206–2212. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Perez F., Endimiani A., Hujer K.M., Bonomo R.A. The continuing challenge of ESBLs. Curr. Opin. Pharmacol. 2007;7:459–469. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Perilli M., Segatore B., Mugnaioli C., Celenza G., Rossolini G.M., Stefani S., Luzzaro F., Pini B., Amicosante G. Persistence of TEM-52/TEM-92 and SHV-12 extended-spectrum beta-lactamases in clinical isolates of Enterobacteriaceae in Italy. Microb. Drug Resist. 2011;17(4):521–524. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Perry J.D., Naqvi S.H., Mirza I.A., Alizai S.A., Hussain A., Ghirardi S., Orenga S., Wilkinson K., Woodford N., Zhang J., Livermore D.M., Abbasi S.A., Raza M.W. Prevalence of faecal carriage of Enterobacteriaceae with NDM-1 carbapenemase at military hospitals in Pakistan, and evaluation of two chromogenic media. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2011;66(10):2288–2294. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Petroni A., Corso A., Melano R., Cacace M.L., Bru A.M., Rossi A., Galas M. Plasmidic extended-spectrum beta-lactamases in Vibrio cholerae O1 El Tor isolates in Argentina. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2002;46:1462–1468. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Philippon L.N., Naas T., Bouthors A.T., Barakett V., Nordmann P. OXA-18, a class D clavulanic acid-inhibited extended-spectrum beta lactamase from Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 1997;41:2188–2195. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Pitout J.D., Laupland K.B. Extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae: an emerging public health concern. The Lan. Infect. Dis. 2008;8(3):159–166. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Pitout J.D., Hossain A., Hanson N.D. Phenotypic and molecular detection of CTX-M-β-lactamases produced by Escherichia coli and Klebsiella spp. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2004;42:5715–5721. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Pitout J.D., Gregson D.B., Church D.L., Elsayed S., Laupland K.B. Community-wide outbreaks of clonally related CTX-M-14 beta-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli strains in the Calgary health region. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2005;43(6):2844–2849. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Pitout J.D., Hamilton N., Church D.L., Nordmann P., Poirel L. Development and clinical validation of a molecular diagnostic assay to detect CTX-M-type β-lactamases in Enterobacteriaceae. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2007;13:291–297. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Poirel L., Le Thomas I., Naas T., Karim A., Nordmann P. Biochemical sequence analyses of GES-1, a novel class A extended-spectrum β-lactamase, and the class 1 integron in 52 from Klebsiella pneumoniae. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2000;44:622–632. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Poirel L., Girlich D., Naas T., Nordmann P. OXA-28, an extended-spectrum variant of OXA-10 beta-lactamase from Pseudomonas aeruginosa and its plasmid- and integron-located gene. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2001;45:447–453. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Poirel L., Kampfer P., Nordmann P. Chromosome-encoded Ambler class A β-lactamase of Kluyvera georgiana, a probable progenitor of a subgroup of CTX-M extended-spectrum β-lactamases. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2002;46:4038–4040. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Rice L.B., Willey S.H., Papanicolaou G.A., Medeiros A.A., Eliopoulos G.M., Moellering R.C.J., Jacoby G.A. Outbreak of ceftazidime resistance caused by extended-spectrum beta-lactamases at a Massachusetts chronic-care facility. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 1990;34(11):2193–2199. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Rossi F., Garcia P., Ronzon B., Curcio D., Dowzicky M.J. Rates of antimicrobial resistance in Latin America (2004–2007) and in vitro activity of the glycylcycline tigecycline and of other antibiotics. Braz. J. Infect. Dis. 2008;12(5):405–415. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Ruiz J. Mechanisms of resistance to quinolones: target alterations, decreased accumulation and DNA gyrase protection. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2003;51:1109–1117. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Rupinder B., Geeta W., Shikha J. Prevalence of extended spectrum β-lactamases in multidrug resistant strains of gram negative Bacilli. J. Acad. Indus. Res. 2013;1(9):558–560. [Google Scholar]
  • Ruth A.A., Damian C.O., Romanus I.I., Charles O.E. Antimicrobial resistance status and prevalence rates of extended spectrum beta-lactamase producers isolated from a mixed human population. Bosnian J. Basic Med. Sci. 2011;11(2):91–96. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Sanchez G.V., Master R.N., Karlowsky J.A., Bordon J.M. In vitro antimicrobial resistance of urinary Escherichia coli isolates among U.S. outpatients from 2000 to 2010. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2012;56(4):2181–2183. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Sankar S., Narayanan H., Kuppanan S., Nandagopal B. Frequency of extended spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Gram-negative bacilli in a 200-bed multi-specialty hospital in Vellore district, Tamil Nadu, India. Infection. 2012;40(4):425–429. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Schwarz S., Kehrenberg C., Doublet B., Cloeckaert A. Molecular basis of bacterial resistance to chloramphenicol and florfenicol. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2004;28:519–542. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Shakti R., Debasmita D., Mahesh C., Sahu R., Padhy N. Surveillance of ESBL producing multidrug resistant Escherichia coli in a teaching hospital in India. Asian Pac. J. Trop. Dis. 2014;4(2):140–149. [Google Scholar]
  • Siegel, J.D., Rhinehart, E., Jackson, M., Chiarello, L., 2006. Health Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee. Management of multidrug-resistant organisms in healthcare settings, <http://www.cdc.gov/ ncidod/dhqp/pdf/ar/MDROGuideline2006.pdf>. [PubMed]
  • Sirot D., Sirot J., Labia R., Morand A., Courvalin P., Darfeuille-Michaud A., Perroux R., Cluzel R. Transferable resistance to third-generation cephalosporins in clinical isolates of Klebsiella pneumoniae: identification of CTX-1, a novel beta lactamase. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 1987;20(3):323–334. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Soughakoff W., Goussard S., Courvalin P. TEM-3 beta-lactamases which hydrolyzes broad-spectrum cephalosporins is derived from the TEM-2 penicillinases by two amino acid substitutions. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 1988;56:343–348. [Google Scholar]
  • Spanu T., Sanguinetti M., Tumbarello M., D’Inzeo T., Fiori B., Posteraro B., Santangelo R., Cauda R., Fadda G. Evaluation of the new VITEK 2 extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) test for rapid detection of ESBL production in Enterobacteriaceae isolates. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2006;44:3257–3262. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Spratt B.G. Resistance to antibiotics mediated by target alterations. Science. 1994;264:388–393. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Steward C.D., Wallace D., Hubert S.K., Lawton R., Fridkin S.K., Gaynes R.P., McGowan J.E., Tenover F.C. Ability of laboratories to detect emerging antimicrobial resistance in nosocomial pathogens: a survey of project ICARE laboratories. Diag. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2000;38(1):59–67. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Straus S.K., Hanco*ck R.E.W. Mode of action of the new antibiotic for gram-positive pathogens daptomycin: comparison with cationic antimicrobial peptides and lipopeptide. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 2006;1758:1215–1223. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Strohl W.R. Marcel Dekker Inc.; New York, USA: 1997. Biotech Antibiotics. [Google Scholar]
  • Swedish Institute for Infectious Disease Control, 2012. Available from: <http://www.smi.se/in-english/statistics/extended-spectrum-beta-lactamaseesbl/> (accessed 16-04-12).
  • Tande D., Jallot N., Bougoudogo F., Montagnon T., Gouriou S., Sizun J. Extended spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae in a Malian orphanage. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2009;15(3):472–474. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Tawfik A.F., Alswailem A.M., Shibl A.M., Al-Agamy M.H. Prevalence and genetic characteristics of TEM, SHV, and CTX-M in clinical Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates from Saudi Arabia. Microb. Drug Resist. 2011;17(3):383–388. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Thakur S., Pokhrel N., Sharma M. Prevalence of multidrug resistant enterobacteriaceae and extended spectrum β lactamase producing Escherichia coli in urinary tract infection. R.J.P.B.C.S. 2013;4(2):1615–1624. [Google Scholar]
  • Tzouvelekis L.S., Bonomo R.A. SHV-type β-lactamases. Curr. Pharm. Des. 1999;5:847–864. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Tzouvelekis L.S., Tzelepi E., Tassios P.T., Legakis N.J. CTX-M type beta-lactamases: an emerging group of extended-spectrum enzymes. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents. 2000;14:137–143. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • UK Health Protection Agency. Laboratory detection and reporting of bacteria with extended spectrum β-lactamases. QSOP 51. <http:// www.hpa-standardmethods.org.uk/documents/qsop/pdf/qsop51. pdf> (accessed 17.01.2008).
  • Vahaboglu H., Ozturk R., Aygun G., Coskunkan F., Yaman A., Kaygusuz A., Leblebicioglu H., Balik I., Aydin K., Otkun M. Widespread detection of PER-1-type extended-spectrum beta-lactamases among nosocomial Acinetobacter and Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates in Turkey: a nationwide multicenter study. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 1997;41:2265–2269. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Vahaboglu H., Coskunkan F., Tansel O., Ozturk R., Sahin N., Koksal I., Kocazeybek B., Tatman-Otkun M., Leblebicioglu H., Ozinel M.A., Akalin H., Kocagoz S., Korten V. Clinical importance of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (PER-1-type)-producing Acinetobacter spp. and Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains. J. Med. Microbiol. 2001;50:642–645. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Walsh C. ASM Press; Washington, DC: 2003. Antibiotics: actions, origins, resistance. [Google Scholar]
  • Weldhagen G.F., Poirel L., Nordmann P. Ambler class A extended-spectrum beta-lactamases in Pseudomonas aeruginosa: novel developments and clinical impact. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2003;47:2385–2392. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Wiegand I., Geiss H.K., Mack D., Sturenburg E., Seifert H. Detection of extended-spectrum β-lactamases among Enterobacteriaceae by use of semiautomated microbiology systems and manual detection procedures. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2007;45:1167–1174. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Winokur P.L., Canton R., Casellas J.M., Legakis N. Variations in the prevalence of strains expressing an extended-spectrum beta-lactamase phenotype and characterization of isolates from Europe, the Americas, and the Western Pacific region. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2001;32:94–103. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Wolter D.J., Hanson N.D., Lister P.D. Insertional inactivation of oprD in clinical isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa leading to carbapenem resistance. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2004;236:137–143. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Woodford N., fa*gan E.J., Ellington M.J. Multiplex PCR for rapid detection of genes encoding CTX-M extended-spectrum β-lactamases. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2006;57:154–165. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Woodford N., Turton J.F., Livermore D.M. Multi resistant gram negative bacteria: the role of high-risk clones in the dissemination of antibiotic resistance. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2011;35:736–755. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Yang W., Moore I.F., Koteva K.P., Bareich D.C., Hughes D.W., Wright G.D. TetX is a flavin-dependent monooxygenase conferring resistance to tetracycline antibiotics. J. Biol. Chem. 2004;279:52346–52352. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

Antibiotic resistance and extended spectrum beta-lactamases: Types, epidemiology and treatment (2024)
Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Pres. Lawanda Wiegand

Last Updated:

Views: 5546

Rating: 4 / 5 (71 voted)

Reviews: 94% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Pres. Lawanda Wiegand

Birthday: 1993-01-10

Address: Suite 391 6963 Ullrich Shore, Bellefort, WI 01350-7893

Phone: +6806610432415

Job: Dynamic Manufacturing Assistant

Hobby: amateur radio, Taekwondo, Wood carving, Parkour, Skateboarding, Running, Rafting

Introduction: My name is Pres. Lawanda Wiegand, I am a inquisitive, helpful, glamorous, cheerful, open, clever, innocent person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.