Appellate review (2024)

From Ballotpedia

Jump to:navigation, search

Appellate review (1)

Contents

  • 1 Appeals
    • 1.1 Types of appeals
  • 2 Appellate procedure
    • 2.1 Filing an appeal
    • 2.2 Decisions on appeal
  • 3 Appellate courts
  • 4 See also
  • 5 Footnotes

Appellate review is a term referring to the power that a higher court has to examine decisions of lower courts. Appellate review may serve the goal of correcting an error in the way that matters of the law were decided in the lower court. Alternately, appellate review can serve in the creation of precedent. In these instances, a case raises a new issue of law to which previous cases do not apply. The case is then appealed to a higher court so that the legal issue may be decided and principles may be created to be followed and anticipated in future disputes. Generally, the appellate review only addresses issues of law; factual findings of the lower courts are not disputed.[1]

Appeals

In law, an appeal is a process for making a formal challenge to an official decision. Depending on the circ*mstances, appeals may be made to the same authority or to a higher judicial authority.[2] In common law jurisdictions, most commonly, this means formally filing a notice of appeal with a lower court, indicating one's intention to take the matter to the next higher court with jurisdiction over the matter and then actually filing the appeal with the appropriate appellate court.

Types of appeals

All appeals are either as of right or discretionary.

  • As of right means that the appellant has a right to the appeal. These appeals are taken at the resolution of a case, once a judgment has become final.
  • Discretionary appeals are appeals taken at the discretion of the appellate court that will hear the case. The appellant must move, or ask, the appellate court for permission to appeal. The appellate court may then either grant or deny that request. All appeals heard by the United States Supreme Court are discretionary.[3]

Appellate procedure

Appellate procedure, including the process of determining whether there is a right of appeal in a particular decision, varies greatly from country to country. Even within a jurisdiction, the nature of an appeal can vary greatly depending on the type of case. When reviewing errors of the lower court, the appellate court focuses on errors of a legal nature; appellate courts do not usually disturb factual findings.[1]

Filing an appeal

A party who files an appeal is called an appellant or petitioner, and a party on the other side is an appellee or respondent. Cross-appeals can also occur, when more than one party to a case is unhappy with the decision in some way, often when the winning party claims that more damages were deserved than were awarded.[4]

The appellant is the party who, having lost part or all of their claim in a lower court decision, is appealing to a higher court with appellate jurisdiction to have their case reconsidered. This is usually done on the basis that the lower court judge erred in the application of law, but it may also be possible to appeal on the basis of court misconduct or that a finding of fact was entirely unreasonable to make on the evidence.[5]

The appellant in the new case can be either the plaintiff or defendant from the lower case, depending on who was the losing party. The winning party from the lower court, however, becomes the respondent in the appeal. In unusual cases, the appellant can be the victor in the court below, but still appeal.[6]

An appellee is the party to an appeal in which the lower court judgment was in its favor. The appellee is required to respond to the petition, oral arguments and legal briefs of the appellant. In general, the appellee takes the procedural posture that the lower court's decision should be affirmed.[7]

Decisions on appeal

The appellant's case is normally reviewed by a panel of judges at the appellate level. These judges will look at the record from the lower court. This record is the documentation of the case, including all the pleadings, motions, and memoranda filed with the court, transcripts from pre-trial, trial, and post-trial hearings, and trial exhibits. Other than the written brief submitted by each party and the oral argument, if applicable, the appeallate judges cannot go beyond this record in making a decision.[8]

After reviewing the case, the appellate court can choose:

  1. to affirm or uphold the lower court's judgment,
  2. reverse the lower court's judgment entirely and remand (or return) the case to the lower court for a new trial, or
  3. affirm in part and reverse in part the lower court's judgment and remand the case to the lower court to correct an issue (the part the appellate court reversed).[9]

Appellate courts

An appellate court is a court that hears cases on appeal from another court. Depending on the particular legal rules that apply to each circ*mstance, a party to a court case who is unhappy with the result might be able to challenge that result in an appellate court on specific grounds. These grounds typically could include errors of law, fact or procedure (in the United States, due process).

Appellate courts in the United States include the United States Court of Appeals and the United States Supreme Court in the federal court system and intermediate appellate courts and state supreme courts in state judiciaries.

In different jurisdictions, appellate courts may also be called appeals courts, courts of appeals, superior courts or supreme courts.

See also

Footnotes

Appellate review (2)

ve

Terms and Definitions project
Pages within the project

BallotDemocracyOregon tax revoltPolitical action committeeLegislatureTaxpayer Bill of RightsBig governmentSupermajorityEminent domainRecall (political)Chief petitionerEligible voterFraudulent signatureSignature certificationPetition driveSecretary of State (state executive office)Lieutenant Governor (state executive office)Governor (state executive office)Attorney General (state executive office)Lower courtRevisor of StatutesElectorBond issueStatuteTIF districtCitizenTax revoltStarve-the-beastElectoral CollegeVote counting system501(c)(3)501(c)(4)Women's suffrageLegislative Counsel (California)Paid blockerSponsorship signatureBicameral legislatureElectorateState legislatureWashington, D.C. Board of Elections and EthicsAssociate JusticeTaxpayer-funded lobbyingUnicameralismBicameralismSignature challengeSin taxTownshipRegulatory takingsCodes and Canons of Judicial ConductContinuing legal educationNational initiativeRemonstrance-petition processSchool district bond issueDefense of Marriage AmendmentsSchool bond electionCivil law (common law)Prohibition (writ)Prerogative writQuo warrantoFederal Rules of Civil ProcedureCivil procedureArbitrationEvidence (law)Procedural lawRules of evidenceTrier of factSeverance taxKey open government termsCirculator affidavitFact blockingOutsourced public informationSignature recovery lawsuitDisenfranchisem*ntVoter suppressionVoter registration drivePhone jammingJim Crow lawsPoll taxChief JusticePrecinctProtest votePlatformConstituencyIntimidation of votersShy Elephant FactorCounty seatCounty councilCounty commissionCountyCounty executiveCommonwealthMayorCity managerConstitutional officersMetagovernmentUnion rightsDivisionsGovernmentJudiciaryOpen governmentElectionUnited States SenateUnited States CongressUnited States House of RepresentativesStep compactionStep freezeFederal judges on senior statusSupernumeraryLocal governmentDifficultState Senate President Pro TemporeState Senate Majority LeaderState Senate Minority LeaderApprovedDefeatedRainy day fundMunicipal bond issueRead lawSigner intentConservatismRandom samplingUpper houseAd valorem taxLower houseLiving Constitution501(c)(2)Recess appointmentIRS Form 990501(c)State legislatorGeneral obligation bondConstitutional articleSchool boardColorado tax collectorsFact findingFlorida school boardFlorida sheriffMaintenance of membershipEmergency clauseChief Judge, U.S. Bankruptcy CourtMillLouisiana local officialsFinancial yearQuarterColorado public trusteesColorado directors of human servicesColorado public health directorsColorado county attorneysColorado grants administratorsState Speaker of the HouseBallot-box budgetingArkansas local officialsMinnesota Board of TeachingNorth Dakota Education Standards and Practices BoardClarity and factual hearings for Michigan recallsPresident of the SenateState Senate Majority WhipBackground checksLocal taxesState Senate Majority Caucus LeaderState Senate Minority Caucus LeaderQuestion TimeElected officialsAcademic performanceTiedGlossary of state budget termsMembership dues deductionEqualized millsEarmarksIRS code, section 501Public school district (United States)CityAgriculture Commissioner (state executive office)Treasurer (state executive office)Labor Commissioner (state executive office)Public Service Commissioner (state executive office)Superintendent of Schools (state executive office)Natural Resources Commissioner (state executive office)Controller (state executive office)Auditor (state executive office)Insurance Commissioner (state executive office)State executive officesCircle PeacemakingNew SeatRestitutionGovernment transparencyBoard of supervisorsIndex of TermsExecutive branchToo close to callComprehensive Annual Financial ReportAdvanced to RunoffLocal government budgetsResign-to-run lawSovereign immunityCompensationSuper PACPresident of the United StatesConstitution (document)Nonprofit organizationRate of returnCost of living adjustmentPension systemOpen Meeting LawPublic recordsHome ruleContractsTaxpayer-funded lobbying associationsTaxpayer-funded lobbying disclosureTexas sheriffColorado clerks of court and recordersColorado sheriffsLobbyingAdministrative officialsTaxesUsabilityMayor-council governmentCouncil-manager governmentCheckbook register onlineProactive disclosureDisclosureAppointment confirmation processMissouri Accountability PortalSchool district websitesAuditsEthicsPACs and Super PACsTeacher merit paySenioritySkill-based payFund balanceValidity ratePension fundEmployee and employer contributionsPension Terms and DefinitionsAudit ReportsUnfunded liabilitiesBlue slip (federal judicial nominations)Scheduled electionUnscheduled electionEnergy terms and definitionsGlossary of education termsCommon Core State Standards InitiativeImpeachment of federal officialsBipartisanEducation terms and definitionsPreliminary and certified election resultsGlossary of energy terms527 groupRace and Ethnicity on the United States CensusGenuine Progress IndicatorAppellate jurisdictionCommon lawGlossary of pension termsJudicial reviewP5+1 and E3+3Double dippingTrade promotion authority (TPA)Trade adjustment assistance (TAA)Investor-State Dispute Settlement (ISDS)Currency manipulationWinner-take-allBundlingOriginal thirteen statesCampaign communicationsPolitical strategistCampaign managerPolitical directorGeneral jurisdictionGrand juryResolution declaring the office of speaker vacantRight-to-work lawsDeferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA)Deferred Action for Parents of U.S. Citizens and Lawful Permanent Residents (DAPA)Deferred actionEvery Student Succeeds ActHybrid PACStabilizerSwitcherSupreme Court termRules of the Supreme Court of the United StatesSupreme Court Rule 1Supreme Court Rule 2Supreme Court Rule 3Supreme Court Rule 4Supreme Court Rule 5Supreme Court Rule 6Supreme Court Rule 7Supreme Court Rule 8Supreme Court Rule 9Supreme Court Rule 10Supreme Court Rule 11Supreme Court Rule 12Supreme Court Rule 13Supreme Court Rule 14Supreme Court Rule 15Supreme Court Rule 16Supreme Court Rule 17Supreme Court Rule 18Supreme Court Rule 19Supreme Court Rule 20Supreme Court Rule 21Supreme Court Rule 22Supreme Court Rule 23Supreme Court Rule 24Supreme Court Rule 25Supreme Court Rule 26Supreme Court Rule 27Supreme Court Rule 28Supreme Court Rule 29Supreme Court Rule 30Supreme Court Rule 31Supreme Court Rule 32Supreme Court Rule 34Supreme Court Rule 35Supreme Court Rule 36Supreme Court Rule 37Supreme Court Rule 38Supreme Court Rule 39Supreme Court Rule 40Supreme Court Rule 41Supreme Court Rule 42Supreme Court Rule 43Supreme Court Rule 44Supreme Court Rule 45Supreme Court Rule 46Supreme Court Rule 47Supreme Court Rule 48Supreme Court Rule 33Special districtsDistrict attorneyCounty assessorBorough presidentCounty sheriffCounty clerkCounty treasurerPublic administratorCounty auditorDistrict clerkConstableJustice of the peaceGlossary of finance policy termsClotureSharing economyRidesharingHomesharingInterstate compactMidterm electionsCalifornia Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017Campaign finance methodologyEvidence-based medicineGlossary of recall termsIllegal alienBattlegroundsHow we decide when to update vote totals on and after election nightAmicus briefSenate ParliamentarianElection integrityStep movementActing officeholderDave Beaudoin/Sandbox Impeachment of Ken PaxtonImpeachment of Ken Paxton, 2023Slate of candidates

Appellate review (2024)

FAQs

Appellate review? ›

The appellate court reviews the record to make sure there is substantial evidence that reasonably supports the trial court's decision. The appellate court's function is not to decide whether it would have reached the same factual conclusions as the judge or jury.

What is an appeal review? ›

Appellate review is a term referring to the power that a higher court has to examine decisions of lower courts. Appellate review may serve the goal of correcting an error in the way that matters of the law were decided in the lower court. Alternately, appellate review can serve in the creation of precedent.

What is the meaning of the appellate process? ›

Appellate procedure consists of the rules and practices by which appellate courts review trial court judgments. Appellate review performs several functions, including correcting errors committed by a trial court, developing the law, and achieving uniformity across courts.

How long is the appellate review process? ›

An appellate court may issue its opinion, or decision, in as little as a month or as long as a year or more. The average time period is 6 months, but there is no time limit. Length of time does not indicate what kind of decision the court will reach.

How do the appellate courts review the process? ›

The appellate courts do not retry cases or hear new evidence. They do not hear witnesses testify. There is no jury. Appellate courts review the procedures and the decisions in the trial court to make sure that the proceedings were fair and that the proper law was applied correctly.

What does it mean when you ask an appellate court to review a case? ›

If you appeal, the appellate court will review the trial court record to decide if a legal mistake was made in the trial court that changed the outcome of the case.

Who typically reviews cases at the appellate level? ›

California Supreme Court

The Supreme Court is the state's highest court. It can review cases decided by the Courts of Appeal. Also, certain kinds of cases go directly to the Supreme Court and are not heard first in the Court of Appeal: Death penalty appeals.

What are the chances of winning an appeal? ›

Statistically speaking, any appellant faces an uphill battle with less than a 50% chance of success. But, with those odds, why should a client ever appeal? Todd Smith and Jody Sanders answer this question, highlighting why appeals matter even when the odds might not point to success.

What is a standard of appellate review? ›

The “standard of review” describes an appellate court's analytical process. It determines how stringently the court will review the decision below. The standard typically depends on the nature of the decision under review (i.e., conclusion of law, finding of fact, exercise of discretion, etc.).

Why would an appeal be denied? ›

Lack of a legal basis

The appeal may be denied if you cannot show that the lower court made a legal mistake. Some of these mistakes include a violation of your rights, a biased trial judge or denial of counsel.

What is the scope of appellate review? ›

Scope of review- which specific trial court actions or omissions are properly subject to review on a given appeal-defines the breadth of the review function. As between the latter two aspects of the review function, the jurisprudence of standards is relatively the more systematically developed and accessible.

What are the four possible outcomes of an appellate case? ›

There are several possible outcomes of an appeal — the lower court's holding may be “affirmed,” “reversed,” “affirmed in part and reversed in part,” “dismissed,” or “modified.” Each of these are very different results.

What is it called when an appellate court is asked to review a case? ›

appeal - A request made after a trial, asking another court (usually the court of appeals) to decide whether the trial was conducted properly. To make such a request is "to appeal" or "to take an appeal." Both the plaintiff and the defendant can appeal, and the party doing so is called the appellant.

What does it mean when your appeal is under review? ›

Once you have filed an appeal, you may receive a letter stating that you have an “appeal under review.” This is a point in the SSA's decision-making process that is neither good nor bad, but rather it means that your case is being reviewed to ensure that the decision on your eligibility for benefits was made correctly.

What are the different types of review on appeal? ›

When the appellant argues that the superior court erred in its ruling, the Court of Appeal looks first at what the standard of review is for that particular issue. The three most common standards of review are (1) abuse of discretion, (2) substantial evidence, and (3) de novo review.

What are the 5 steps of the appeal process? ›

In this article, we'll discuss the five major appeal process steps.
  • Step 1: Hiring an Appellate Attorney (Before Your Appeal) ...
  • Step 2: Filing the Notice of Appeal. ...
  • Step 3: Preparing the Record on Appeal. ...
  • Step 4: Researching and Writing Your Appeal. ...
  • Step 5: Oral Argument.
Jun 8, 2020

What is the standard of review in an appeal and why is it important? ›

Standard of review is so important, in fact, that most appellate courts require a separate section in an appellate brief on the standard of review that applies to the issues being briefed. Standards of review reflect the law's perspective on an appellate court's ability to make the right decision on a given issue.

Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Kieth Sipes

Last Updated:

Views: 5781

Rating: 4.7 / 5 (47 voted)

Reviews: 86% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Kieth Sipes

Birthday: 2001-04-14

Address: Suite 492 62479 Champlin Loop, South Catrice, MS 57271

Phone: +9663362133320

Job: District Sales Analyst

Hobby: Digital arts, Dance, Ghost hunting, Worldbuilding, Kayaking, Table tennis, 3D printing

Introduction: My name is Kieth Sipes, I am a zany, rich, courageous, powerful, faithful, jolly, excited person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.