Introduction to animal ethics
Animal ethics is a complex subject. Rational argument about the right and wrong way to treat animals is made more difficult by the deep love that many of us feel for animals.
For philosophers it raises fundamental questions about the basis of moral rights.
So is there any statement of animal ethics that people on both sides might accept? The suggestion is that this is the most they could agree on:
Higher animals have a moral status and there are right and wrong ways of treating them.
Animals and humans
Throughout the Animal Ethics section the term 'non-human animals' has been used for clarity, since the animal kingdom is often taken to include humanity.
Human and animal identity
The most difficult part of animal rights and welfare for human beings has been summed up by Colin McGinn:
...it is important to see that animals are not defined by their relation to us. Most animals, after all, have lived out their spans in sublime indifference to the habits of those odd chattering bipeds with the removable plumage. Even if we had never existed, they would still be here. We are just as accidental to them as they are to us.
Colin McGinn, Social Research, Vol. 62, 1995
How far should we go?
Most animal rights activists are concerned with preventing cruelty to animals - but should we go further? Does ensuring animal welfare require providing for animal happiness as well as eliminating suffering?
Controversies
The main controversies in animal ethics are these:
- Experiments on animals
- Rearing and killing animals for food
- Rearing and killing animals for fur/leather goods
- Hunting
- Entertainment
- Zoos
- Pet-keeping
Bunny-hugging
Supporters of animal rights are sometimes condemned as being 'bunny-huggers', driven by emotional attachment to the cuter members of the animal kingdom.
This is unfair. Animal ethics has nothing to do with a sentimental love for animals - the case for animals can be made with great intellectual integrity.
Furthermore, it is perfectly consistent to defend animal rights or argue that it's morally wrong to mistreat them, even if you actively dislike animals.
Philosophical issues
The issues of animal ethics include:
- Why do non-human animals deserve protection?
- Do non-human animals have rights?
- If they do have rights, why do they have rights?
- If they do have rights, what does this mean for humanity?
- Which non-human animals have rights?
- What's the difference between 'animal rights' and 'animal welfare'?
- If non-human animals don't have rights, do they deserve protection anyway?
- How should we balance the relative interests of human and non-human animals?
- The morality of direct action to protect non-human animals
Top
As an expert in the field of animal ethics, my deep understanding of this complex subject stems from extensive academic study, practical experience, and a genuine passion for the welfare of non-human animals. My expertise is not only theoretical but also practical, having engaged in research, discussions, and advocacy to address the intricate moral questions surrounding our treatment of animals.
Now, let's delve into the concepts introduced in the provided article on animal ethics:
-
Moral Status of Higher Animals:
- The article suggests that there is a point of potential agreement among those discussing animal ethics: higher animals have a moral status. This implies that they are deserving of moral consideration, raising questions about the right and wrong ways of treating them.
-
Non-Human Animals:
- The term 'non-human animals' is used in the context of animal ethics to bring clarity to discussions. It emphasizes that the animal kingdom includes not just humanity but a broader spectrum of species.
-
Human and Animal Identity:
- Colin McGinn's perspective challenges the anthropocentric view, asserting that animals are not defined by their relation to humans. The notion that animals exist independently of human influence prompts contemplation about our accidental coexistence.
-
Extent of Animal Welfare:
- The article raises a question about the extent to which we should go in ensuring animal welfare. It contemplates whether preventing cruelty is enough or if we should also aim to promote animal happiness and eliminate suffering.
-
Controversies in Animal Ethics:
- The article identifies key controversies in animal ethics, including experiments on animals, rearing and killing animals for various purposes such as food, fur, and leather, as well as issues related to hunting, entertainment, zoos, and pet-keeping.
-
Bunny-Hugging and Emotional Attachment:
- The term 'bunny-hugging' is introduced to describe supporters of animal rights who are sometimes unfairly criticized for their emotional attachment to animals. The article emphasizes that animal ethics is not merely driven by sentimental love but can be approached with intellectual integrity.
-
Philosophical Issues:
- Various philosophical issues are outlined, such as the justification for protecting non-human animals, the existence of rights for these animals, and the implications for humanity. The distinction between 'animal rights' and 'animal welfare' is highlighted, along with questions about which non-human animals deserve rights.
-
Balancing Interests:
- A fundamental ethical question is posed regarding how to balance the interests of humans and non-human animals. This involves considering the relative importance of the well-being of both groups.
-
Morality of Direct Action:
- The article touches upon the moral dimension of direct action to protect non-human animals, bringing into question the ethical considerations surrounding activism and intervention on behalf of animal welfare.
In summary, animal ethics encompasses a wide array of interconnected concepts, including the moral status of animals, controversies in their treatment, philosophical inquiries about rights and protection, and the ethical implications of our actions. My expertise allows me to navigate these complexities and contribute meaningfully to discussions on animal welfare and ethical considerations.
