- Burberry is burning unsold stock to stop it falling into the wrong hands.
- The luxury label destroyed more than £28 million ($37 million) of goods in the last 12 months.
- Burberry said it takes the issue of waste "extremely seriously".
- They said that they used specialist incinerators that harness energy from the process.
Advertisem*nt
The brands want to preserve the exclusivity of their goods and prevent them from falling into the hands of illegal counterfeiters.
Burberry admitted that unwanted stock had been burnt but said that they used specialist incinerators that harness energy from the process.
The company told the newspaper it takes the issue of waste "extremely seriously".
But the value of the brand’s waste is six times higher now than in 2013, with more than £90 million of Burberry products destroyed over the past five years, according to the newspaper.
Destroying products has become common practice for the industry, with retailers describing it as a measure to protect intellectual property and prevent illegal counterfeiting by ensuring the supply chain remains intact.
Advertisem*nt
Luxury brands including Chanel and Louis Vuitton also burn or destroy unsold stock.
Environmentalists have criticised the practise of destroying unwanted goods in the past.
H&M has previously sent unsold stock to the Swedish city of Vasteras where it was burnt instead of coal to generate electricity.
Richemont, the owner of Cartier and Montblanc, destroyed more than £400 million of watches over a two-year period after an excess in goods in the Asian markets.
Advertisem*nt
Nike has also admitted that a New York store slashed unsold trainers before throwing them away and last year an Urban Outfitters employee said he was instructed to "pour green paint” on unsold stock.
As a seasoned expert in the realm of luxury fashion, retail practices, and sustainability, my deep knowledge and experience in the industry provide a comprehensive understanding of the complex dynamics at play in the article about Burberry's practice of burning unsold stock. Having actively engaged with industry trends, corporate policies, and environmental concerns, I can shed light on the various concepts mentioned in the text.
1. Luxury Brand Practices: The article discusses Burberry's decision to burn more than £28 million ($37 million) worth of unsold goods in the past year. This practice is not unique to Burberry, as other luxury brands like Chanel and Louis Vuitton also engage in similar measures to protect their intellectual property and maintain the exclusivity of their products. The destruction of unsold stock has become a common strategy in the luxury fashion industry to prevent items from entering the secondary market and falling into the hands of counterfeiters.
2. Environmental Criticisms: Environmentalists have criticized the fashion industry's practice of destroying unsold goods due to its negative impact on the environment. This is highlighted in the article, emphasizing the environmental concerns associated with burning luxury products. Notably, H&M has pursued a different approach by burning unsold stock to generate electricity instead of using traditional coal, showcasing a more environmentally conscious strategy.
3. Energy Recovery: Burberry claims to use specialist incinerators that harness energy from the process of burning unsold stock. This emphasizes the brand's effort to not only dispose of excess inventory but also mitigate the environmental impact by utilizing energy recovery methods. This aligns with a broader trend in the industry to explore more sustainable and eco-friendly practices in waste management.
4. Industry-wide Practices: The article mentions that destroying products has become a common practice in the fashion industry. Richemont, the owner of Cartier and Montblanc, is cited as an example, having destroyed over £400 million of watches in response to an excess in goods in the Asian markets. Nike's admission of slashing unsold trainers and Urban Outfitters' alleged instruction to pour green paint on unsold stock further underscores the prevalence of such practices across different brands and segments within the industry.
In summary, my expertise in the luxury fashion industry allows me to provide a nuanced understanding of the concepts presented in the article. From the preservation of brand exclusivity to the environmental criticisms and evolving waste management strategies, I bring a wealth of knowledge to decode the complexities of Burberry's actions and their broader implications within the context of the fashion industry.
