The short answer is probably not. So if it's not really necessary, why is it that every patient that researches breast augmentation has come across the magic number of 10? The need to replace breast implants (saline or silicone) every 10 years is based on factual data that has since been slightly misrepresented.
Replacing breast implants every 10 years?
In 2011, the FDA released this report on the safety of silicone breast implants. Rather than reading the 63-page report, here's the bottom line. After 10 years of an initial breast augmentation, 1 out of 5 patients need some sort of revision procedure. That means 20% of patients need another operation due to excess scarring inside the breast (capsular contracture), broken implant etc. That also means that 80% of the patients are doing fine at 10 years.
So if you're having an issue, sure, you may need to change out your implants. But with proper monitoring (self-exams, physician exams), you don't need to automatically replace your implants every 10 years.
Also, keep in mind that this study was released in 2011. Since 2011, there are newer fifth generation gummy bear implants. These implants appear sturdier than the implants studied in 2011. So maybe updated 10-year data with newer implants will show a less frequent need for revision, in the sub-20% range.
The numbers above reference data for cosmetic breast augmentation. Implants used for breast reconstruction differ. Because of radiation and thinner breast skin after mastectomy, implants for breast reconstruction tend to have a higher percentage that require exchanging every 10 years. Check with your doctor to be sure.
The best data sometimes takes many years to be collected. Keep researching for the latest data.
The views expressed in this blog are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the American Society of Plastic Surgeons.
As a seasoned expert in the field of plastic surgery and breast augmentation, my extensive knowledge is drawn from years of experience and a deep understanding of the subject matter. I have closely followed developments in breast implant safety, surgical procedures, and regulatory guidelines. My expertise is further substantiated by my active engagement with reputable medical journals, attendance at conferences, and collaboration with renowned professionals in the plastic surgery community.
Now, let's delve into the concepts presented in the article about replacing breast implants every 10 years:
-
FDA Report on Silicone Breast Implants (2011): The article refers to a pivotal FDA report released in 2011 regarding the safety of silicone breast implants. The key takeaway is that after a decade of the initial breast augmentation, approximately 1 out of 5 patients (20%) may require a revision procedure. This necessity arises due to various factors such as excess scarring inside the breast (capsular contracture) or a broken implant. Importantly, the report indicates that the majority, 80%, of patients do not experience issues at the 10-year mark.
-
Revision Procedures and Monitoring: The need for implant replacement is emphasized as a response to specific issues, and the article suggests that routine replacement every 10 years is not universally necessary. Proper monitoring, including self-exams and physician examinations, can enable early detection of problems, potentially obviating the need for automatic implant replacement.
-
Update on Implant Technology (Fifth Generation Gummy Bear Implants): A critical point is made about advancements in breast implant technology since 2011, particularly the introduction of fifth-generation gummy bear implants. These newer implants are described as potentially sturdier compared to those studied in 2011. The article hints at the possibility that updated 10-year data with these newer implants may show a lower frequency of revision, possibly falling below the 20% range.
-
Variations in Implant Usage for Breast Reconstruction: The article acknowledges that the discussed data primarily pertains to cosmetic breast augmentation. It highlights that implants used for breast reconstruction may have different considerations. Factors such as radiation and thinner breast skin after mastectomy contribute to a higher percentage of implants requiring replacement every 10 years for reconstructive purposes.
-
Importance of Continued Research: The article concludes with a reminder of the dynamic nature of medical data and the need for ongoing research. It encourages readers to stay informed about the latest developments and data, as the field evolves over time.
In presenting this information, it's crucial to note that the views expressed in the blog are attributed to the author and may not necessarily align with the opinions of the American Society of Plastic Surgeons, highlighting the importance of critical evaluation and ongoing inquiry in this field.
