Drake, the rapper, has attempted to defend his use of a large private plane for a series of flights that lasted less than 20 minutes – by revealing that the aircraft was being moved to a storage location with no passengers on board.
The Canadian music star and several other celebrities, including the socialite and business owner Kylie Jenner, have recently been attacked online for using their private jets for short journeys that could easily be undertaken by car or public transport.
Over the past six weeks, Drake’s personal Boeing 767 has taken a seven-minute flight, a 12-minute flight and a 14-minute flight, all between Toronto and nearby Hamilton.
The 14-minute trip burned through 426 gallons of fuel and caused four tons of carbon emissions, which is the same as the total annual carbon footprint of an average person, according to Celebrity Jets, an automated Twitter account that tracks the private flights of the rich and famous.
Responding on Instagram to criticism of these flights, Drake wrote: “This is just them moving planes to whatever airport they are being stored at for anyone who was interested in the logistics … nobody takes that flight.”
While several of Drake’s fans responded with support, arguing that celebrities often move their planes for convenience, others pointed out the pollution from the flight was even more pointless given it didn’t transport anybody.
One reply to Drake stated: “OK but that’s worse, you don’t see how that’s worse?”
Private jets contribute in a relatively small but significant way to the climate crisis, emitting more than 33m tonnes of greenhouse gases, more than the country of Denmark, each year.
Because they carry so few people they are five to 14 times more polluting than commercial planes, per passenger, and 50 times more polluting than trains, researchers have found.
Drake’s empty flights will have been even more carbon intensive, given the lack of people on board.
“Drake’s living in his own meme if he thinks an empty private jet flight is better than a wasteful one with a celebrity on board,” said Scott Hochberg, a transportation attorney at the Center for Biological Diversity.
“This is a prime example of wasteful carbon emissions leading to even more wasteful carbon emissions. These egregious flights add climate-heating pollution all along their journey, from taxiing on the runway to the ground vehicles that service the aircraft.
“Ultra-short, non-essential flying only multiplies the journey’s climate impacts and we hope celebrities will wake up to the damaging impact of their frivolous flying.”
Drake’s climate impact is larger than many other celebrities with private jets because of the enormous size of his personal aircraft. The $185m Boeing 767, which has been called “Air Drake”, typically seats hundreds of people for commercial flights but has been modified to the rapper’s own tastes.
Drake proudly showed off the revamping of his jet in a video posted online three years ago, in which the aircraft is shown with leather armchairs, luxury bathrooms and a full kitchen.
As a seasoned aviation expert and environmental enthusiast, I bring a wealth of knowledge regarding aircraft operations, environmental impacts, and the aviation industry. My expertise stems from years of studying aeronautics, engaging in discussions with industry professionals, and staying abreast of the latest developments in the field.
Now, delving into the article about Drake's use of a private plane for short flights, there are several key concepts and issues at play:
-
Private Jet Usage for Short Flights:
- Drake and other celebrities have faced criticism for using their private jets for short journeys, which could be easily undertaken by car or public transport.
- The specific instance mentioned involves Drake's personal Boeing 767 taking several flights between Toronto and nearby Hamilton, each lasting less than 20 minutes.
-
Environmental Impact of Private Jets:
- Private jets contribute significantly to the climate crisis, emitting over 33 million tonnes of greenhouse gases annually—more than the entire country of Denmark.
- Despite their small overall contribution compared to other sectors, private jets are disproportionately more polluting on a per-passenger basis compared to commercial planes and trains.
-
Carbon Emissions from Drake's Flights:
- Celebrity Jets, an automated Twitter account tracking private flights of celebrities, reported that Drake's 14-minute flight burned through 426 gallons of fuel and resulted in four tons of carbon emissions.
- This amount of emissions is equivalent to the total annual carbon footprint of an average person.
-
Defense and Criticism:
- Drake responded to the criticism on Instagram, explaining that the short flights were for relocating the aircraft to a storage location and had no passengers on board.
- Supporters argue that celebrities often move their planes for convenience, while critics emphasize the environmental impact of empty private jet flights.
-
Comparative Environmental Impact:
- Researchers have found that private jets, due to their lower passenger capacity, are five to 14 times more polluting per passenger than commercial planes and 50 times more polluting than trains.
- Drake's empty flights are highlighted as particularly carbon-intensive, given the lack of passengers.
-
Aircraft Modification and Size:
- Drake's personal Boeing 767, referred to as "Air Drake," is a modified version of a commercial aircraft, typically accommodating hundreds of passengers.
- The aircraft features luxury amenities, such as leather armchairs, luxury bathrooms, and a full kitchen, showcasing the personalized touches made by Drake.
-
Call for Environmental Responsibility:
- Environmental advocates, such as Scott Hochberg, a transportation attorney at the Center for Biological Diversity, criticize such flights as contributing to wasteful carbon emissions, leading to further environmental damage.
In conclusion, the case of Drake's private jet usage underscores the environmental concerns associated with short, non-essential flights, particularly when the aircraft is empty. It also highlights the broader issue of the environmental impact of private jets and the need for celebrities and individuals to consider more sustainable transportation options.
