Effects of emissions from sugar cane burning on the trachea and lungs of Wistar rats (2024)

Effects of emissions from sugar cane burning on the trachea and lungs of Wistar rats (1)

Jornal Brasileiro de Pneumologia

J Bras Pneumol. 2017 May-Jun; 43(3): 208–214.

PMCID: PMC5687952

PMID: 28746532

Language: English | Portuguese

Author information Article notes Copyright and License information Disclaimer

ABSTRACT

Objective:

To evaluate the effects of exposure to emissions from sugar cane burning on inflammatory mechanisms in tissues of the trachea and lung parenchyma in Wistar rats after different periods of exposure.

Methods:

This was an experimental open randomized study. The animals were divided into four groups: a control group (CG) underwent standard laboratory conditions, and three experimental groups were exposed to emissions from sugar cane burning over different periods of time, in days-1 (EG1), 7 (EG7), and 21 (EG21). After euthanasia with 200 mg/kg of ketamine/xylazine, fragments of trachea and lung were collected and fixed in 10% formalin. Histological analyses were performed with H&E and picrosirius red staining.

Results:

No inflammatory infiltrates were found in the tissues of CG rats. The histological examination of tissues of the trachea and lung parenchyma revealed that the inflammatory process was significantly more intense in EG7 than in the CG (p < 0.05 and p < 0.01, respectively). In comparison with the CG and EG1, angiogenesis in the lung parenchyma and collagen deposition in tracheal tissues were significantly greater only in EG21 (p < 0.001 and p < 0.01, respectively).

Conclusions:

In this sample, emissions from sugar cane burning induced acute focal and diffuse inflammation in the lamina propria of tracheal tissues, with no loss of ciliated epithelial tissue. In the lung parenchyma of the animals in the experimental groups, there was interstitial and alveolar edema, together with polymorphonuclear cell infiltrates.

Keywords: Saccharum, Smoke, Inflammation, Respiratory system

RESUMO

Objetivo:

Avaliar os efeitos da exposição à fumaça da queima da cana-de-açúcar sobre mecanismos inflamatórios em tecidos de traqueia e de parênquima pulmonar de ratos Wistar após diferentes períodos de exposição.

Métodos:

Estudo experimental, randomizado, não cego. Os animais foram divididos em quatro grupos: controle (GC), sob condições padrão de laboratório e os demais expostos à fumaça da queima da cana-de-açúcar por diferentes períodos: em 1 (GE1), 7 (GE7) e 21 (GE21) dias. Após a eutanásia com 200 mg/kg de ketamina/xilazina, foram coletados fragmentos de traqueia e pulmão e fixadas em formol 10%. Análises histológicas foram realizadas com coloração com H&E e picrosírius.

Resultados:

Não houve infiltrado inflamatório nos tecidos no GC. O processo inflamatório na análise histológica de tecidos de traqueia e de parênquima pulmonar foi significativamente mais intenso no GE7 quando comparado ao GC (p < 0,05 e p < 0,01, respectivamente). Em comparação com os grupos GC e GE1, apenas no GE21 foi observada angiogênese significativa no parênquima pulmonar e aumento significativo de depósitos de colágeno em tecido de traqueia (p < 0,001 e p < 0,01, respectivamente).

Conclusões:

Nesta amostra, a fumaça da queima de cana-de-açúcar induziu processo inflamatório focal, difuso e agudo em tecidos de traqueia na lâmina própria, sem perda do tecido epitelial ciliado. Houve presença de edemas intersticiais e alveolares e infiltrados de células polimorfonucleares no parênquima pulmonar nos animais dos grupos experimentais.

Descritores: Saccharum, Fumaça, Inflamação, Sistema respiratório

INTRODUCTION

Sugar cane, Saccharum officinarum, is widely cultivated in Brazil for the production of ethanol and sugar, being essential to the country’s economy.1,2 Harvesting of sugar cane, when performed manually, is preceded by burning of sugar cane fields to remove dry leaves, facilitate cutting, and reduce the risk of bites and stings by venomous animals.3-7

Sugar cane combustion releases a large quantity of particulate matter (PM), in addition to gases, such as ozone, carbon monoxide, nitric oxide, sulfur oxide, formaldehyde, benzopyrene, and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons,6-8 all of which contribute to air pollution and adversely affect human health.2,9,10

The PM and toxic compounds generated by sugar cane burning are harmful to the respiratory tract, because as they are inhaled and deposited in the lower airways, they are phagocytosed by alveolar macrophages, which release cytotoxic cytokines, thus inducing inflammation.4,8 The stress caused by smoke can trigger a series of cellular reactions that aim to restore stability; however, when this stress is chronic, it causes irreversible cellular damage.11 Coarse PM from smoke damages the upper airways, which are directly exposed to the external environment, whereas fine PM from smoke accumulates in the bronchi and bronchioles, leading to permanent damage and fibrosis.12,13 Alveolar structures are susceptible to responses of an inflammatory nature and can cause pathological reactions with obstructive and restrictive consequences,11,12,14-16 generally associated with the process of tissue remodeling.14

Although the risks from exposure to smoke, such as tobacco smoke or emissions from fossil fuel burning, are known, there have been few studies on this topic. Therefore, the objective of the present investigation was to use an experimental model to evaluate the effects of exposure to emissions from sugar cane burning on inflammatory mechanisms in tissues of the trachea and lung parenchyma after different periods of exposure.

METHODS

This was an experimental open randomized study. In the study, 28 male Wistar rats weighing 250-300 g were housed in cages with sawdust bedding, maintained on a 12/12-h light/dark cycle at 25-28°C, and provided free access to standard rodent chow and filtered water. The animals were divided into four groups: a control group (CG) of 4 animals underwent standard laboratory conditions for 24 h; and three experimental groups of 8 animals each were exposed to emissions from sugar cane straw burning for consecutive periods of 1, 7, and 21 days (EG1, EG7, and EG21, respectively). For the purposes of the study, a combustion chamber with a portable air extraction device was built where 200 g of sugar cane straw were burnt, generating a continuous stream of smoke that was piped into the cages of the experimental animals for 2 h daily at the same time of day (Figure 1).

Effects of emissions from sugar cane burning on the trachea and lungs of Wistar rats (2)

Photograph (in A) and schematic (in B) of the combustion chamber.

The animals were euthanized by i.p. administration of 5% ketamine/xylazine diluted with 2 mL of physiological saline. After this procedure, the trachea was exposed and cannulated, a laparotomy was performed to separate the organs, and the abdominal aorta and inferior vena cava were sectioned. The trachea was then occluded by suture to maintain the lungs at functional residual capacity. A trans-sternal thoracotomy was performed through the diaphragm to remove the trachea and lungs. The collected organs were washed with physiological saline for macroscopic examination and were fixed in 10% buffered formalin.

Tissue fragments obtained from the material were processed conventionally and embedded in paraffin to prepare slides containing 5-μm sections. The sections were stained with H&E and picrosirius red for analysis under light microscopy (BX51; Olympus Optical, Tokyo, Japan) at a magnification of ×100. A digital camera (C-7070; Olympus) was used to obtain photomicrographs. To perform a semi-quantitative microscopic analysis, the histological changes found were classified as mild, moderate, or marked.

For a morphometric analysis, three photomicrographs were obtained of non-overlapping fields of the tissues studied. In the tracheal sections, areas containing hyaline cartilage, lamina propria, and ciliated epithelium were selected. In the lung parenchyma, bronchioles, alveoli, and blood vessels were evaluated. The nuclear area was quantified (in pixels) to evaluate the inflammatory process, using Adobe Photoshop CS5 software (Adobe Systems Inc.; San Jose, CA, USA). Collagen deposition was quantified by picrosirius red staining, positive staining corresponding to the presence of type I collagen. Angiogenesis was assessed by counting the number of blood vessels per quadrant of each panoramic photomicrograph, using BioEstat 5.3 software.

A statistical analysis was carried out using the Shapiro-Wilk normality test. After confirmation of normality, ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc test was used. In cases of non-normality, the Kruskal-Wallis test and Dunn’s post hoc test were used. Results were expressed as group means and standard deviations and as box plots. The level of significance was set at 5%.

The study was approved by the Animal Research Ethics Committee of the Faculdade Adventista da Bahia (Protocol no. 013/2014).

RESULTS

Macroscopic examination of the trachea revealed no changes in tissue color or integrity in any of the groups. The lungs of EG7 and EG21 rats showed focal and diffuse macroscopic changes in different lobes, these changes being related to tissue color and texture.

The histological findings for each group are described below.

In the CG, there were no inflammatory infiltrates or structural tissue changes in the trachea (Figure 2). The lung parenchyma showed no alveolar, septal, or bronchiolar changes and was of normal appearance (Figure 3).

Effects of emissions from sugar cane burning on the trachea and lungs of Wistar rats (3)

Photomicrographs of tracheal sections from animals in the different groups studied (H&E and picrosirius red; magnification, ×100). A (control group), Photomicrograph showing hyaline cartilage of normal appearance, with preservation of ciliated epithelium and no inflammatory infiltrates in the lamina propria (arrow). B (group exposed to emissions from sugar cane straw burning for 1 day), Photomicrograph showing intense focal inflammatory infiltrate in the lamina propria (arrow). C (7-day exposure group), Photomicrograph showing moderate diffuse acute inflammatory infiltrate in the lamina propria of the mucosa (arrow) and in the submucosal region adjacent to the seromucous glands (triangle), with ciliary preservation. D (21 day-exposure group), Photomicrograph showing mild to moderate diffuse inflammatory infiltrate in the lamina propria of the mucosa (arrow). E (7-day exposure group), Photomicrograph showing mild staining for collagen. F (21-day exposure group), Photomicrograph showing increased acidophilia of the connective tissue, indicating collagen deposition (arrow).

Effects of emissions from sugar cane burning on the trachea and lungs of Wistar rats (4)

Photomicrographs of tissue sections from animals in the different groups studied (H&E and picrosirius red; magnification, ×100). A (control group), Photomicrograph showing terminal bronchioles (triangle), respiratory bronchioles (arrow), alveolar ducts, and bronchus-associated lymphoid tissue (star) without tissue changes. B (group exposed to emissions from sugar cane straw burning for 1 day), Photomicrograph showing focal perivascular (arrows) and peribronchiolar (triangle) inflammatory infiltrates and diffuse infiltrate in the lung parenchyma (circle). C (7-day exposure group), Photomicrograph showing changes in alveolar architecture (circle) and intense, diffuse peribronchiolar and perivascular inflammatory infiltrates (arrows). D (21-day exposure group), Photomicrograph showing moderate diffuse alveolar inflammatory infiltrate, together with alveolar edema and septal losses. E (7-day exposure group), Photomicrograph showing perivascular (arrows) and peribronchiolar (triangle) collagen deposition. F (21-day exposure group), Photomicrograph showing perivascular and peribronchiolar collagen deposition and alveolar collagen deposition (circle).

In EG1, a mild inflammatory infiltrate was present in the trachea in 87.5% of the cases. However, in 12.5% of the samples analyzed, the inflammatory response was intense and predominantly focal (Figure 2). In the lung parenchyma, an inflammatory process, consisting of 50% of polymorphonuclear cells, was present in 75% of the cases, and the diffuse form predominated over the focal one. Infiltrates were found in perivascular areas (ranging from mild to moderate) and in peribronchiolar areas. In addition, mild interstitial edema was observed, and there was no collagen deposition (Figure 3).

In EG7, inflammatory infiltrates of varying intensity-mild (in 62.5% of the cases), moderate (in 50.0%), and intense (in 25.0%)-were present in the tracheal tissue (Figure 2). The onset of collagen deposition was demonstrated by the increased acidophilic reaction in the trachea after picrosirius red staining (Figure 2). Microscopic examination of the lung parenchyma revealed an inflammatory process in 87.5% of the cases and a polymorphonuclear cell infiltrate in 62.5%. A mild to intense diffuse inflammatory process was present in 75% of the cases. A perivascular infiltrate pattern was present in 62.5% of the specimens. In addition, perivascular and peribronchiolar collagen deposition was found (Figure 3).

In EG21, a diffuse inflammatory infiltrate was observed in 75% of the cases, being of mild (in 25%) to moderate (in 50%) intensity. No intense inflammatory infiltrates were found (Figure 2). After picrosirius red staining, there was increased acidophilia, indicating the presence of collagen (Figure 2). Histological examination of the lung parenchyma revealed mild to intense diffuse inflammatory infiltrates, with a predominance of mononuclear cells, in 100% of the cases. There was mild perivascular and peribronchiolar inflammation in 50% and 25% of the cases, respectively. Necrosis was observed in 37.5% of the cases and angiogenesis was observed in 100% (p < 0.001) when EG21 was compared with the CG and EG1; in addition, perivascular and peribronchiolar collagen deposition was seen, as was alveolar collagen deposition (Figure 3).

Morphometric and statistical analysis (Figure 4) demonstrated the presence of an inflammatory process in the tracheal tissue of experimental group rats. The mean nuclear area (in pixels) was 379.78 ± 105.65 in the CG, 650.36 ± 147.74 in EG1, 899.18 ± 183.65 in EG7, and 751.96 ± 143.64 in EG21. In comparison with the CG, EG7 showed a more significant inflammatory response (p < 0.05). The data obtained from the morphometric analysis are complementary to the findings of the semi-quantitative analysis.

Effects of emissions from sugar cane burning on the trachea and lungs of Wistar rats (5)

Morphometric analysis of the trachea in the control group (CG) and in the groups exposed to emissions from sugar cane straw burning for 1 day (EG1), for 7 days (EG7), and for 21 days (EG21). In A, kinetics of the inflammatory process as determined by nuclear area analysis. EG7 showed a significant difference relative to the CG (p < 0.05). There was a reduction in inflammation in EG21, suggestive of initiation of tissue repair. In B, determination of collagen deposition. Only EG21 showed significant differences relative to the CG and EG1 (p < 0.01 for both).

Morphometry after picrosirius red staining revealed no collagen deposition in the CG and showed a slight progressive, but not statistically significant, increase in acidophilia in EG1 and EG7. However, tracheal tissue collagen deposition was found to be greater in EG21 than in the CG and EG1 (p < 0.01 for both; Figure 4).

Morphometric analysis of the lung parenchyma was performed by determining the mean nuclear area (in pixels). In the CG, the mean nuclear area was 893.13 ± 51.89, which is within normal values. In EG1, polymorphonuclear and mononuclear cellularity started to increase, and the mean nuclear area was 1,373.66 ± 155.43; in EG7, the mean nuclear area reached 2,280.98 ± 744.80 (p < 0.01 in the intergroup comparison). However, the mean nuclear area decreased to 1,251.31 ± 231.75 in EG21, which is suggestive of tissue repair (Figure 5).

Effects of emissions from sugar cane burning on the trachea and lungs of Wistar rats (6)

Morphometric analysis of the lung parenchyma in the control group (CG) and in the groups exposed to emissions from sugar cane straw burning for 1 day (EG1), for 7 days (EG7), and for 21 days (EG21). In A, nuclear area analysis showing the presence of an inflammatory infiltrate in all groups. EG7 showed statistically significant differences relative to the CG, EG1, and EG21 (p < 0.01 for all). There was a reduction in inflammation in EG21, suggestive of initiation of tissue repair. In B, quantification of the number of blood vessels. There was an increase in EG7, but angiogenesis was confirmed only in EG21 with significant differences relative to the CG and EG1 (p < 0.001 for both).

Morphometric analysis showed no angiogenesis in the CG, EG1, or EG7. In contrast, in EG21, angiogenesis was detected in 100% of the cases (Figure 5).

DISCUSSION

Our results show that exposure of Wistar rats to emissions from sugar cane burning over different periods of exposure was associated with increased inflammation in tracheal and lung tissues. Focal and diffuse inflammatory polymorphonuclear cell infiltrates were found in the acute phase in the trachea of experimental group rats, especially of EG7 rats. No loss of ciliated epithelium was observed in any of the experimental groups relative to the CG. Tissue fibrosis in the trachea, corresponding to the early stages of the chronic phase, was confirmed in EG21. In the lung parenchyma, alveolar, vascular, and bronchiolar changes were observed in the experimental groups relative to the CG. The time criteria adopted for designating the inflammatory response phases were based on a study of Wistar rats that were administered bleomycin sulfate, in which the inflammatory response was characterized as acute (from day 1 to day 7 after the insult); subacute (from day 7 to day 14 after the insult); and resolving (from day 15 to day 30 after the insult).17

An experimental study, in which rats received intratracheally-instilled fine PM, observed lung inflammation characterized by macrophage and neutrophil infiltrates, demonstrating that cytokines (IL-12 and IFN-γ) play a key role in injury severity18; similarly, an experimental rabbit study found an increased recruitment of macrophages and polymorphonuclear cells in the lung parenchyma.19 In the present study, we found inflammatory changes consisting of polymorphonuclear cells and alveolar macrophages in the lung tissue of rats as early as in EG1.

Tracheal instillation of low doses of PM from sugar cane burning produced changes in the respiratory tract by reducing the thickening of the connective tissue and increasing the production of proinflammatory cytokines and chemokines.8 In the present study, morphometry confirmed that emissions from sugar cane burning are able to induce significant and progressive necrotic inflammatory processes, even after short periods of exposure. Alveolar macrophages (after phagocytosis), as well as lung epithelial cells, respond to exposure to PM by increasing inflammatory mediator production, which can lead to certain mechanisms, such as leukocyte proliferation and activation, apoptosis, and endothelial repair.20 These changes are explained by the elements present in smoke; these data confirm our findings, especially in EG7.

It is known that the size of particles emitted from biomass burning has a negative impact on the airways.21,22 The size of inhaled PM, in terms of varying particle granularity, determines the clinical manifestations in the body. Coarse PM (< 10 µm) is retained in the upper airways and can be removed by ciliary activity; thin PM (< 2.5 µm) and ultrafine particles/nanoparticles (< 0.1 µm) are usually the result of incomplete oxidation of carbon.22-24 Fine and ultrafine PM have the ability to reach the alveoli and be phagocytosed by alveolar macrophages, having greater deleterious effects, such as changes in lung mechanics, alveolar collapse, and oxidative stress, in rats.23-26 Chronic exposure to fine particles is strongly associated with higher rates of chronic respiratory disease.3

After direct exposure of mice to dung biomass smoke for 7 consecutive days, a significant increase in cellularity, especially in macrophage cellularity, was observed in the lungs.27 Exposure to emissions from sugar cane burning produced inflammatory infiltrates of varying intensity in the animals of the present study, and, in EG7, there was a more significant inflammatory infiltrate in both tissues of the trachea and lung parenchyma, given that there were areas of more severe inflammation.

Damage to the lung parenchyma after chronic exposure to dung biomass smoke and cigarette smoke includes moderate to marked interstitial inflammation, bronchial and perivascular inflammation, vascular congestion, alveolar destruction, an increase in the number of macrophages, and an increase in vascular wall thickness.3 In the present study, although the exposure was acute only, it was possible to observe that the experimental groups showed a growing change in alveolar structure (septal loss) relative to the CG, with PM being phagocytosed especially in EG1. Areas suggestive of necrosis were identified especially in EG7 and EG21, and angiogenesis was confirmed in EG21.

Rabbits chronically exposed to emissions from biomass and cigarette burning show perivascular inflammation, peribronchiolar inflammation, parenchymal infiltrate, and fibrosis, with respiratory epithelial proliferation and emphysematous changes.28 Using picrosirius red staining, we demonstrated that, in EG7 and EG21, there were areas of tracheal tissue collagen deposition, areas of peribronchiolar and vascular collagen deposition, and diffuse areas of lung parenchymal collagen deposition, which suggest that continued exposure can lead to a tissue fibrotic process.

On the basis of morphological criteria, we found that the changes in alveolar structure in EG7 and the rupture of interalveolar septa in EG21 were consistent with the findings of a rat study that showed that 24.6% of the cigarette smoke-exposed animals had increased alveolar spaces relative to controls, which were not exposed.29

Therefore, the above data allow us to state that acute exposure to emissions from sugar cane burning is able to induce severe damage to the respiratory system. The components of emissions from sugar cane burning trigger polymorphonuclear cell inflammatory processes in the trachea and also induce inflammatory infiltrates and interstitial and alveolar edema in the lung parenchyma of Wistar rats. Changes in alveolar architecture and angiogenesis are also found.

Further research targeting prolonged exposure and determination of proinflammatory marker levels is needed to demonstrate the potential damage caused by chronic exposure to the components of emissions from sugar cane burning, since workers in sugar cane fields and the neighboring population are exposed to these emissions for long periods of their life.

1Study carried out at the Faculdade de Tecnologia e Ciências da Bahia, Salvador (BA) Brasil.

Financial support: None.

REFERENCES

1. Brasil. Ministério da Agricultura, Pecuária e Abastecimento . Anuário Estatístico da Agroenergia 2014. Brasília: o Ministério; 2015. [Google Scholar]

2. Lelieveld J. Evans JS, Fnais M, Giannadaki D, Pozzer A The contribution of outdoor air pollution sources to premature mortality on a global scale. Nature. 2015;525(7569):367–371. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature15371 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

3. Dogan OT, Elagoz S, Ozsahin SL, Epozturk K, Tuncer E, Akkurt I. Pulmonary toxicity of chronic exposure to tobacco and biomass smoke in rats. Clinics (Sao Paulo) 2011;66(6):1081–1087. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1807-59322011000600027 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

4. Ribeiro H. Sugar cane burning in Brazil respiratory health effects [Article in Portuguese]. Rev Saude. Publica. 2008;42(2):370–376. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-89102008005000009 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

5. Brasil. Ministério da Agricultura, Pecuária e Abastecimento . Sapcana - Sistema de Acompanhamento de Produção Canavieira. Brasília: o Ministério; 2016. 3. http://www.agricultura.gov.br/assuntos/sustentabilidade/agroenergia/acompanhamento-da-producao-sucroalcooleira/arquivos-2014-2015/16-04-2014.pdf/view [Google Scholar]

6. The WHO Pages Wildland/Vegetation Fires. Ann Burns Fire Disasters. 2000;13(3):178–178. www.medbc.com/annals/review/vol_13/num_3/text/vol13n3p178.htm [Google Scholar]

7. Ribeiro H, Ficarelli TR. Queimadas nos canaviais e perspectivas dos cortadores de cana-de-açúcar em Macatuba, São Paulo. Saude Soc. 2010;9(1):48–63. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0104-12902010000100005 https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-12902010000100005 [Google Scholar]

8. Bittar OT. Estudo dos efeitos do material particulado proveniente da biomassa de cana-de-açúcar sobre o aparelho respiratório e circulatório de ratos Wistar combinados ou não com a infecção estafilocócica. Campinas: Universidade Estadual de Campinas; 2013. [Google Scholar]

9. Hutton G. The economics of health and climate change key evidence for decision making. Global Health. 2011;7:18–18. https://doi.org/10.1186/1744-8603-7-18 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

10. National Aeronautics and Space Administration . A Story of Ozone: The Earth's natural sunscreen. Washington, DC: the Administration; 2015. https://www.nasa.gov/content/goddard/a-story-of-ozone-earths-natural-sunscreen [Google Scholar]

11. Prado GF, Zanetta DM, Arbex MA, Braga AL, Pereira LA, de Marchi MR. Burnt sugarcane harvesting Particulate matter exposure and the effects on lung function, oxidative stress, and urinary 1-hydroxypyrene. Sci Total Environ. 2012;437:200–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.07.069 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

12. Arbex MA, Santos Ude P, Martins LC, Saldiva PH, Pereira LA, Braga AL. Air pollution and the respiratory system. J Bras Pneumol. 2012;38(5):643–655. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1806-37132012000500015 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

13. Mazzole-Rocha F, Carvalho GM, Lanzetti M, Valença SS, Silva LF, Saldiva PH. Respiratory toxicity of repeated exposure to particles produced by traffic and sugar cane burning. Respir Physiol Neurobiol. 2014;191:106–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resp.2013.11.004 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

14. William AH, Wallace A. Hasleton P, Flieder DB. Spencer's Pathology of the Lung. 6. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2013. Simpson J, Hirani N. Acute lung injury; pp. 342–360. [Google Scholar]

15. Paraiso ML, Gouveia N. Health risks due to pre-harvesting sugarcane burning in São Paulo State, Brazil. Rev Bras Epidemiol. 2015;18(3):691–701. https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-5497201500030014 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

16. Silva R, Oyarzún M, Olloquequi J. Pathogenic mechanisms in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease due to biomass smoke exposure. Arch Bronconeumol. 2015;51(6):285–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arbr.2015.04.013 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

17. Rossari JR. Fibrose pulmonar induzida por bleomicina intratraqueal em ratos Wistar: uso do interferon-a-2b em um modelo experimental de síndrome da distração respiratória aguda. Porto Alegre: Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul; 2004. [Google Scholar]

18. Ding LR, Wang K, Fahmy B, Shen HH, Cormier S. Airborne fine particle matter induced pulmonary inflammation as well as oxidative stress in neonate rats. Chin Med J (Engl) 2010;123(20):2895–2900. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

19. Miyata R, Bai N, Vincent R, Sin DD, Van Eeden SF. Statins reduce ambient particulate matter-induced lung inflammation by promoting the clearance of particulate matter, &lt; 10 µm from lung tissues. Chest. 2013;143(2):452–460. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.12-1237 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

20. Poma A, Limongi T, Pisan C, Granato V, Picozzi P. Genotoxicity induced by fine urban air particulate matter in the macrophages cell line RAW 264 7. Toxicol In Vitro. 2006;20(6):1023–1029. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tiv.2006.01.014 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

21. Bovo F, Wisniewski P. Efeitos de material particulado sobre mecanismos imunológicos. Biosaude. 2009;11(2):93–100. [Google Scholar]

22. Donaldson K, Stone V. Current hypotheses on the mechanisms of toxicity of ultrafine particles. Ann Ist Super Sanita. 2003;39(3):405–410. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

23. Pope CA, Muhlestein JB, Anderson JL, Cannon JB, Hales NM, Meredith KG, et al. Short-Term Exposure to Fine Particulate Matter Air Pollution Is Preferentially Associated With the Risk of ST-Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Events. J Am Heart Assoc. 2015;4(12):pii: e002506–pii: e002506. https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.115.002506 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

24. Colombini MP. Exposição aguda ao material particulado total em suspensão proveniente de diferentes fontes e suas repercussões nas respostas inflamatórias, sistêmica e local, em ratos. Faculdade de Medicina: Universidade de São Paulo; 2007. [Google Scholar]

25. Mazzoli-Rocha F, Magalhães CB, Malm O, Saldiva PH, Zin WA, Faffe DS. Comparative respiratory toxicity of particles produced by traffic and sugar cane burning. Environ Res. 2008;108(1):35–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2008.05.004 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

26. Riva DR, Magalhães CB, Lopes AA, Lanças T, Mauad T, Malm O. Low dose of fine particulate matter (PM2 5) can induce acute oxidative stress, inflammation and pulmonary impairment in healthy mice. Inhal Toxicol. 2011;23(5):257–267. https://doi.org/10.3109/08958378.2011.566290 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

27. Mehra D, Geraghty PM, Hardigan AA, Foronjy R. A comparison of the inflammatory and proteolytic effects of dung biomass and cigarette smoke exposure in the lung. PLoS One. 2012;7(12):e52889. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0052889 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

28. Fidan F, Unlu M, Sezer M, Sahin O, Tokyol C, Esme H. Acute effects of environmental tobacco smoke and dried dung smoke on lung histopathology in rabbits. Pathology. 2006;38(1):53–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313020500459615 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

29. Zheng H, Liu Y, Huang T, Fang Z, Li G, He S. Development and characterization of a rat model of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) induced by sidestream cigarette smoke. Toxicol Lett. 2009;189(3):225–234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.toxlet.2009.06.850 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Jornal Brasileiro de Pneumologia are provided here courtesy of Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisiologia (Brazilian Thoracic Society)

Effects of emissions from sugar cane burning on the trachea and lungs of Wistar rats (2024)

FAQs

Is burning sugar cane good for the environment? ›

Researchers have also found that sugarcane burning is responsible for significant quantities of cancer-causing pollutants, like formaldehyde, in the air and that residents in the Glades breathe in more of these chemicals than the rest of the state.

Why do they burn cane sugar? ›

Sugar cane burning is carried out by farmers before they harvest the cane. It helps make it easier to process the cane by removing things like the stalks and leaves.

Is burning sugar cane toxic? ›

Pre-harvest sugar field burning releases toxic smoke and ash into the air that locals refer to as “black snow.” In the areas where this antiquated burning practice is employed, two to three South Floridians die prematurely each year because of the exposure.

What environmental impacts do sugarcane have? ›

Sugarcane production often pollutes freshwater ecosystems with silt and fertilizers washed from farms, as well as plant matter and chemical sludge from mills. In the Great Barrier Reef and Mesoamerican Reef, those contaminants are flowing out to sea and damaging coral ecosystems.

Is burning sugar toxic? ›

The PM and toxic compounds generated by sugar cane burning are harmful to the respiratory tract, because as they are inhaled and deposited in the lower airways, they are phagocytosed by alveolar macrophages, which release cytotoxic cytokines, thus inducing inflammation.

What does burned sugar turn into? ›

If sugar burns completely (complete combustion) then the products of the reaction are carbon dioxide and water.

Can you get sick from sugar cane? ›

Symptoms of deteriorated sugarcane poisoning include dizziness, vomiting, convulsion and coma. Death may be resulted in severe cases.

What does burning sugar cane smell like? ›

Cane burning DOES smell like leaves burning or like a campfire. There is really no mistaking it.

What degree burn is a sugar burn? ›

Whether working with Isomalt, molten sugar, or caramel, getting hot sugar on your skin will automatically get you second or third-degree burns. Once you get sugar on your skin, it sticks and continues to burn until you take proper countermeasures.

What is waste from sugar cane called? ›

Bagasse is made from sugarcane waste.

What is the most destructive disease of sugarcane? ›

Yellow leaf disease (YLD) caused by Sugarcane yellow leaf virus (SCYLV) has become a serious threat to sugarcane cultivation in different regions. The epidemic nature of the disease reduced the varietal performance and became a major cause for varietal degeneration.

What are the three major problems faced by sugarcane cultivation? ›

It is concluded from the study that the main problems faced by the farmers regarding sugarcane production were; lack of irrigation water, non-availability of improved varieties of sugarcane, land preparation, high cost of inputs, diseases and insect pest, weeds and marketing problem.

Does sugar cane produce CO2? ›

Growing sugarcane is the biggest contributor of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in the sugarcane production value chain, accounting for 400 million tons of CO2 equivalent annually.

What is the smell of burnt sugar? ›

First off, burnt sugar has a distinct smell. It smells bitter, like coffee that is overly roasted or cookies you've left in the oven too long. If the aroma changes from a pleasant caramel scent to a burnt, unpleasant aroma, you might have taken it too far.

What is burnt sugar called? ›

Burnt sugar is also called black jack in the baking industry. When this term is referred to as a flavor, the reference is to a deep, caramelized flavor, not an actual burnt flavor. To confuse things further, simple caramelized sugar is sometimes referred to as burnt sugar.

What happens when cane sugar is strongly heated? ›

Upon heat, sugar first melts. The physical state changes from solid to liquid. On further heating, sucrose breaks into glucose and fructose. Upon further heating to high temperature, water is lost.

What happens when sugar is burnt is it a reversible change? ›

This change is reversible and does not involve formation of any new substances. Burning sugar leads to reaction of sugar with oxygen in air and leads to formation of carbon dioxide and water. The change is irreversible and is thus a chemical change.

Is burning of sugar a chemical change? ›

When a spoon of sugar is burnt, black charred sugar is formed which is a new substance. This is an example of a chemical change.

Why we should not drink water after eating sugar cane? ›

This is because sugarcane is rich in minerals such as calcium and potassium. Therefore, if you drink water immediately after eating sugarcane. The minerals react with water. The result can be problems such as abdominal pain, bloating, chest tightness, stomach ulcers, mouth ulcers, and headaches.

How long does cane sugar stay in your system? ›

It can take 3-4 hours for your body to mop it up if you are a type 2 diabetic. If you're not a diabetic, it takes about 1-2 hours to get back to normal blood sugar.

Does sugar cane cause sore throat? ›

Fights Inflammation

Sugarcane is heaped with a myriad of antioxidants, flavonoids and phenolic substances. It possesses strong anti-allergic, anti-inflammatory, and antiviral properties that shield you from catching a cold, flu, and sore throat.

Is sugarcane farming bad for the environment? ›

Cane and beet fields are prone to water and wind-generated erosion. Worldwide estimates of soil losses to water erosion under sugarcane range from around 15 to over 500t/ha/year (16).

Does sugar cane increase global warming? ›

They found that compared to land cultivated with other annual crops, sugarcane reduced the local air temperature by an average of 0.93 degrees Celsius (1.67 F). But compared to the natural vegetation of the Cerrado – mainly grass and shrubs – the sugarcane fields warmed the ambient air by 1.55 C (2.79 F).

Can you use sugar cane as fuel? ›

Sugarcane is a well-known biofuel source: Brazil has been fermenting sugarcane juice to make alcohol-based fuel for decades. Ethanol from sugarcane yields 25% more energy than the amount used during the production process, and reduces greenhouse gas emissions by 12% compared to fossil fuels.

Does sugar cane remove CO2 from the air? ›

The study stated that sugarcane crop plays an important role in purifying the air by acting as one of the potential CO2 scavengers.

What is the main problem facing sugarcane farmers? ›

It is concluded from the study that the main problems faced by the farmers regarding sugarcane production were; lack of irrigation water, non-availability of improved varieties of sugarcane, land preparation, high cost of inputs, diseases and insect pest, weeds and marketing problem.

What is bad about sugarcane? ›

An ingredient called policosanol present in sugarcane can cause insomnia, upset stomach, dizziness, headaches and weight loss if consumed excessively. It can also cause blood thinning and can affect the cholesterol levels in the blood.

How much CO2 does sugarcane produce? ›

Growing sugarcane is the biggest contributor of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in the sugarcane production value chain, accounting for 400 million tons of CO2 equivalent annually.

Does sugarcane release methane? ›

The sugarcane residues burning result is not only CO2 emissions but also other GHG or precursors, including carbon monoxide (CO), methane (CH4), non-methane volatile organic compounds (NMVOC) and nitrogen (N2O, NOx) species [36].

Does sugar cane increase cough? ›

Sugarcane juice is known for its digestive benefits, but it is also a great remedy to fight coughs and colds. It is full of natural electrolytes that replenish fluids lost if the body is dehydrated.

What fuel comes from sugar cane? ›

As a clean, affordable and low-carbon biofuel, sugarcane ethanol has emerged as a leading renewable fuel for the transportation sector. Ethanol contributes to decarbonising transport when it is used in its pure form, or when it's blended with gasoline.

Do farmers still burn sugar cane? ›

When such crops are harvested green the very thick trash blanket left on the soil surface has been proven to having a significant negative impact on productivity because soil temperatures are lowered which inhibits re-growth of the cane crop. In New South Wales burning of cane before harvest is still common practice.

Which fuel is made by sugarcane? ›

Biofuels are liquid fuels produced from crops, such as biodiesel produced from soybeans and ethanol made from fermented corn or sugarcane.

Does sugarcane release methane and nitrous oxide? ›

Previous research has identified substantial exchanges of methane (CH4) and nitrous oxide (N2O) between sugarcane soils and the atmosphere.

Why does sugar increase CO2? ›

Sugars cause the gluconeogenesis process to start, as well as trigger, unexpected hormone like responses causing a faster metabolism, which in return, increases carbon dioxide levels (Verstrepen, 2004). This is why both CO2 and ethanol can be used to measure the rate of respiration for yeast.

How does sugar affect CO2? ›

Several studies suggested that sugar in a solution would cause varying carbon dioxide production in alcoholic fermentation. We proposed that increasing sugar, specifically glucose, molarity within each solution would increase carbon dioxide production.

Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Nicola Considine CPA

Last Updated:

Views: 6443

Rating: 4.9 / 5 (49 voted)

Reviews: 80% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Nicola Considine CPA

Birthday: 1993-02-26

Address: 3809 Clinton Inlet, East Aleisha, UT 46318-2392

Phone: +2681424145499

Job: Government Technician

Hobby: Calligraphy, Lego building, Worldbuilding, Shooting, Bird watching, Shopping, Cooking

Introduction: My name is Nicola Considine CPA, I am a determined, witty, powerful, brainy, open, smiling, proud person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.