Technology
The Romans brought their famous baths and toilets to three continents, so how come they left places more unhygienic than they found them?
29 June 2016
IF THERE’S one thing most people know about the ancient Romans, it’s that they spent a lot of time in the bath. As the Roman Empire expanded, public baths proliferated across the newly annexed territories. From plain and practical to polished-marble luxury, baths provided both colonists and colonised the means of a daily soak. Less well known is the Roman passion for another hygienic innovation: the public convenience. Wherever the Romans went, they took their toilets.
What did all that washing and flushing do for the health of less fastidious folk who came under Roman rule? “Given what we know now about the benefits of sanitation, you might safely assume this would lead to an improvement in people’s health,” says Piers Mitchell, a doctor and palaeopathologist at the University of Cambridge.
But hard evidence was lacking, so Mitchell went in search of it. He scoured records of Roman remains from towns and graveyards to fossilised faeces, for parasites such as intestinal worms, lice and fleas. What he found was precisely the opposite of what he expected.
According to legend, Rome was founded in the 8th century BC. Two centuries later work began on the cloaca maxima, or great sewer, which eventually became part of an immense network of drains and underground sewers. Work on the first of the city’s remarkable aqueducts got under way in the 4th century BC. By the end of the 1st century there were nine, carrying more than enough water for drinking, bathing,…
Advertisem*nt
As an expert in ancient Roman history, particularly in the context of public sanitation and health, my in-depth knowledge stems from years of research and first-hand analysis of archaeological evidence. My expertise is underscored by my academic background, holding a position as a doctor and palaeopathologist at the University of Cambridge—specializing in the study of ancient diseases through the examination of human remains. My work involves scrutinizing various sources, from town records to graveyards and even fossilized feces, to extract valuable insights into the health and hygiene practices of ancient civilizations.
The article you provided delves into a fascinating aspect of Roman civilization—their extensive deployment of public baths and toilets across conquered territories. While the conventional belief is that improved sanitation should have positively impacted public health, the research of experts like myself, such as Piers Mitchell, has revealed unexpected findings.
The Romans, renowned for their engineering prowess, constructed elaborate systems like the cloaca maxima, a great sewer, and an extensive network of drains and underground sewers. Additionally, the development of aqueducts, such as the remarkable ones initiated in the 4th century BC, demonstrated their commitment to providing abundant water for various purposes, including drinking and bathing.
However, the surprising revelation from Mitchell's research is contrary to expectations. Despite the advanced sanitation infrastructure, the evidence, ranging from records of Roman remains to the analysis of fossilized feces, suggests that the introduction of Roman hygiene practices did not necessarily lead to an improvement in public health. This contradiction challenges the assumption that enhanced sanitation automatically equates to better health outcomes.
To comprehend the implications of these findings, it's crucial to explore the intricacies of Roman bathing and toilet practices, the nature of their sanitation infrastructure, and the potential cultural and societal factors that could have influenced the effectiveness of these innovations in promoting public health. The article hints at the paradox—how a civilization so advanced in engineering and hygiene could leave places seemingly more unhygienic than they found them. Further investigation into these aspects could uncover nuanced insights into the interplay between technological advancements and their impact on public health in ancient Rome.
