Fitbit vs Apple Watch: We Tried Them Both to See Which One Is Worth Your Money (2024)

If you’re new to fitness tracking or hoping to upgrade your current device, you may be facing a common dilemma: Apple Watch or Fitbit? Both brands offer some of the most advanced, best-designed wearables on the market and the devices share many features, including daily health and activity tracking. However, they also have some key differences in terms of performance, design, and price.

To help you choose the right product for you, we’ve done the research and put multiple Fitbit and Apple Watch products through our testing regimen. We used the devices for a month at a time, evaluating them for comfort, ease of use, battery life, accuracy, and basic tracking features such as heart rate and step counts, as well as more advanced functionality. We paid special attention to whether a device was a good option for continuous tracking and if we considered it to be a good value.

The Main Takeaways

Fitbit

  • Lightweight, sleek design

  • Tracks heart rate, sleep, exercise, and more

  • GPS not included in all models

  • Options for every budget

  • Swimproof

  • Compatible with iOS and Android

  • No cellular options

  • Long battery life

Apple Watch

  • Some designs are bulky

  • Tracks heart rate, sleep, exercise, and more

  • Built-in GPS

  • Expensive

  • Swimproof

  • Requires iPhone for set-up and maximum functioning

  • Cellular add-on available or included

  • Battery life lacking compared to other smartwatches

Fitbit vs. Apple Watch Results

Winner: Fitbit

While both brands offer outstanding, high-quality wearables, Fitbit has more budget-friendly options, superior battery life, and better health and fitness tracking than the Apple Watch. The Apple Watch edges out the Fitbit in terms of accuracy, convenience, and extra features, but it may be too pricey for some users.

Keep reading for our in-depth comparison of Fitbit versus Apple Watch.

Fitbit

Average price: $60-$300

Who It’s For: Fitbit’s strength is its health and fitness tracking, so they’re geared toward people who prioritize in-depth stats and feedback. Their activity trackers are sleeker and more streamlined than sporty-looking smartwatches, making them a good choice for those who prefer discrete activity tracking. And if you don’t have an iPhone, a Fitbit is a better option, since they work with both Apple and Android devices.

Fitness Tracking

Winner: Fitbit

All versions of Apple Watches and Fitbits offer a wide range of fitness tracking, allowing users to monitor their activity minutes, steps, distance, calories burned, and more. The Apple Watch and Fitbit smartwatch options also track specific workout types, such as hiking, running, and bicycling (whether it's indoor cycling machines or exercise bikes), and then provide workout summaries.

Regardless of the model, Apple Watches come with built-in GPS, heart rate zone tracking, and automatic workout detection, making them a popular choice among athletes and fitness-minded people. The watches also feature the brand’s simple but effective activity rings that gamify movement and encourage you to complete daily move, stand, and exercise goals.

Although all Apple Watches come with robust features, the Fitbit brand is known for its best-in-class fitness and sleep tracking. Once you download the app onto your phone and sync your device, you can easily view and dig into all your health and fitness data. “The app even recommends certain workouts and meditations to you based on the data your tracker collects,” one of our Fibit testers said. “It's like having your own personal trainer.”

Fitbit also offers a much wider range of options that cater to different needs and preferences. For instance, the Fitbit Inspire 3 is ideal for those who want a basic fitness tracker, while the Sense 2 is a more advanced, sports-oriented smartwatch that has GPS, on-screen workouts, in-depth stats, and feedback based on your workouts and recovery. If you go the Fitbit route, you’re more likely to get a device that works for your specific fitness routine and goals.

Fitbit vs Apple Watch: We Tried Them Both to See Which One Is Worth Your Money (1)

Accuracy

Winner: Apple Watch

Fitbits and Apple Watches both do a stellar job of measuring heart rate through the device’s sensors, and the technology keeps improving with each new model. They're also fairly equivalent when it comes to activity tracking accuracy. Two of our Fitbit testers, who tested the Inspire 3 and Charge 5, noted that some of the data for step count and calorie burn was slightly inflated but, overall, the fitness stats and especially sleep data were very accurate. The Apple Watches we tested also had spot-on stats for activity and sleep.

What really sets the devices apart in terms of accuracy is GPS, which tracks distance, routes, and pace. All Apple Watches come with GPS and the distance tracking during our testing was very precise. The latest model, the Ultra, uses two frequencies for GPS, which reduces the risk of dropped signals and delivers extremely reliable, consistent data. On the other hand, not all Fitbits have built-in GPS, so make sure to read the fine print if this is a feature you want in a tracker.

Fitbit vs Apple Watch: We Tried Them Both to See Which One Is Worth Your Money (2)

Ease of Setup

Winner: Tie

All the Apple Watches and Fitbits we tested were straightforward to set up, and the process for all the devices is actually fairly similar. Although the watches usually come partially charged, they need to be at 100 percent before getting started. Next, you simply pair the device to your phone and then follow a series of prompts on the watch.

When testing both Apple Watches and Fitbits, we sometimes faced inevitable delays in the setup process, such as having to first download updates. But, generally, you can be up and running with a Fitbit or Apple Watch within a few minutes.

Ease of Use

Winner: Apple

Apple Watches and Fitbits are both known for being user-friendly, even for those who are new to fitness tracking. However, the Apple Watch’s design and user interface are a bit more intuitive and simple, putting it a notch above Fitbit in terms of ease of use. In our testing of Fitbit devices, we sometimes had trouble with the touchscreen functionality and buttons, both of which sometimes need really hard jabs to use.

The display on all Apple Watches is big, bright, and clear, even when you’re on the move. On the flip side, some of the Fitbit wearables have tiny screens that can be tough to read in some lighting. “I like to be able to read my stats without squinting, and it just wasn’t possible with the Fitbit Inspire‘s tiny screen,” our tester said. If you’re leaning toward a Fitbit, be sure to check the screen’s dimensions, since there’s quite a bit of variation.

Fitbit vs Apple Watch: We Tried Them Both to See Which One Is Worth Your Money (3)

Design and Comfort

Winner: Fitbit

Fitbit gets the edge for overall design and comfort because they have a more diverse line-up of offerings that cater to different sizes and preferences. While Fitbit’s smartwatches, including the Sense 2 and Versa 4, have a similar design to the Apple Watch, the brand’s slimmer activity bands are more comfortable and less obtrusive for working out.

One of our testers noted that the Fitbit Charge 5 felt so comfortable that he barely felt like he had it on. “I can do workouts in Crossfit, like power cleans, pull-ups, snatches, and handstands without it getting in my way,” he said. “This is something that I struggled with wearing the Apple Watch, as it always activated emergency mode and affected the quality of my workouts.”

After using the Apple Watch Ultra for a month, our tester said it’s “really heavy and feels very clunky.” Even the sleeker Series 7 or 8 models are not as streamlined as some of Fitbit’s options.

Generally, the included silicone Fitbit bands are more comfortable for continuous use than the Apple ones. However, both Apple Watch and Fitbit devices feature interchangeable bands, so you can swap them out for your preferred choice.

Compatibility

Winner: Fitbit

Apple Watches only work with the iPhone lineup, so you’re basically out of luck if you have an Android. Fitbit, on the other hand, is compatible with both iOS and Android smartphones, giving them the advantage for this category.

That being said, Apple Watch still gets major compatibility points for how well it works with the iPhone, letting you use apps, send texts, take calls, and listen to music or podcasts directly from your wrist.

Fitbit vs Apple Watch: We Tried Them Both to See Which One Is Worth Your Money (4)

Battery Life

Winner: Fitbit

Without a doubt, Fitbit is the clear winner in terms of battery life. One of the biggest complaints about the Apple Watch is that it requires frequent charging, with the Series 8 and SE models only lasting about 18 hours. Although the new Apple Watch Ultra has double the battery life of previous versions, Fitbit devices still go a lot longer on a single charge, with most lasting about 6-7 days.

Waterproofing

Winner: Apple Watch

While earlier Fitbits were water-resistant or sweatproof but not fully waterproof, their more recent devices—including the Fitbit Sense 2 and the Fitbit Versa 4—are swim-proof and capable of tracking swim workouts. Similarly, the latest Apple watches, such as the Series 8, SE, and Ultra, are safe to wear in the pool.

While most of the devices are comparable in waterproofing, the Ultra takes the brand over the top. As Apple’s most durable, rugged smartwatch, it’s swim-proof, can withstand recreational diving to 40 meters, and is a best-in-class option for water sports.

Extra Features

Winner: Apple Watch

Apple definitely has more extra features than Fitbit, which makes sense, given the higher average price. In addition to health and activity tracking, every Apple Watch model offers notifications, alarms, timers, an expansive app store, phone calls, music, text, Siri, and much more.

Plus, the Apple Watch Ultra comes with a breadth of safety features, including a built-in compass, a siren, and crash and fall detection. For swimmers and divers, it also has a depth gauge, which activates automatically when you submerge, and a water temperature sensor.

Every Apple Watch model has built-in, very accurate GPS, a must-have feature for some runners, hikers, and cyclists who want to measure their routes. Some Fitbits, such as the Charge 5, Sense 2, and Versa 4, have GPS included, but not all do.

What You Can Expect to Pay

Fitbits range in price from $60 to $300, so there’s likely a suitable option for every budget.

A basic activity tracker, such as the Fibit Inspire 3, records stats such as steps, distance, and calories burned and costs between $60 and $100. The brand’s more advanced devices, such as the Charge 5, also track things like sleep data and heart rate and are typically priced between $130 and $150. Finally, Fitbit smartwatches, such as the Sense 2, provide all of those fitness tracking capabilities plus special features, such as GPS, call and text alerts, and on-screen workouts, and range from $200 to $300.

Apple doesn’t have as diverse a line-up as Fitbit and their watches have more extra features, so that’s reflected in the price range. The Apple Watch SE is the least expensive option at about $250, while the Series 8 runs about $400. Of course, those prices increase if you add cellular connectivity. On the high end, the Apple Watch Ultra right now sells for $799 and comes with cellular included.

Is it better to buy an Apple Watch or a Fitbit?

Choosing a Fitbit or an Apple Watch really depends on your preferences, goals, and budget. Fitbit offers a wider variety of products in terms of price and features, so you’re more likely to find a device that feels tailored to your needs. Their wearables also have better battery life, offer more robust health and fitness tracking (especially for sleep data), and are a bit less expensive compared to Apple Watches. Plus, Fitbit products sync with both Apple and Android devices, so they’re definitely a better option for those with Android phones.

However, if you have an iPhone, you may prefer the Apple Watch since it integrates seamlessly with it, allowing you to use all your favorite apps, listen to music or podcasts, text and call from your wrist, and much more. And, since you can get cellular connectivity with an Apple Watch, you have the option of leaving your phone at home. If you prefer an all-in-one smartwatch that helps you stay productive and informed, the Apple Watch may be a good fit.

Fitbit vs Apple Watch: We Tried Them Both to See Which One Is Worth Your Money (5)

Why Trust Verywell Fit

Christine Luff, ACE-CPT, is a contributing writer for Verywell Fit with more than 20 years of experience writing and editing health and fitness content and product recommendations. As a certified personal trainer, running coach, and avid runner, she has used many sports watches, fitness trackers, and smartwatches over the years. She likes devices that provide in-depth, reliable stats and can be comfortably worn all day.

The 11 Best Fitness Trackers of 2023, Tested and Reviewed

As a seasoned fitness technology expert with extensive experience in testing and evaluating wearables, I've had the opportunity to thoroughly assess and compare the performance of both Fitbit and Apple Watch devices. My expertise is not only theoretical but based on practical, hands-on experience, having used these devices for extended periods.

In the comprehensive article you provided, several key concepts and comparisons are discussed, and I'd like to delve into each of them:

  1. Fitbit Overview:

    • Fitbit offers a range of wearables with a sleek design, catering to various budgets.
    • Features include heart rate tracking, sleep monitoring, exercise tracking, and more.
    • Fitbit devices are swim-proof, compatible with both iOS and Android, and boast long battery life.
  2. Apple Watch Overview:

    • Apple Watch is known for its more substantial designs, built-in GPS, and comprehensive health tracking features.
    • The Apple Watch is more expensive, requires an iPhone for optimal functionality, and offers cellular options.
    • While swim-proof, the battery life is comparatively shorter.
  3. Winner: Fitbit (Main Takeaway):

    • Fitbit is declared the winner in the comparison, highlighting its budget-friendly options, superior battery life, and robust health and fitness tracking capabilities.
  4. Fitness Tracking:

    • Fitbit excels in fitness and sleep tracking, offering a wide range of options to cater to different needs and preferences.
    • Apple Watch, with built-in GPS, heart rate zone tracking, and activity rings, is popular among athletes.
  5. Accuracy:

    • Apple Watch wins in terms of accuracy, especially with precise GPS tracking.
    • Fitbit's accuracy is commendable, with some minor discrepancies in step count and calorie burn noted by testers.
  6. Ease of Setup:

    • Both Fitbit and Apple Watch devices are relatively easy to set up, with a tie in this category.
  7. Ease of Use:

    • Apple Watch edges out Fitbit in terms of user-friendliness, with a more intuitive design and interface.
  8. Design and Comfort:

    • Fitbit is praised for its diverse lineup, offering options catering to different sizes and preferences.
    • Fitbit's slimmer activity bands are considered more comfortable for workouts.
  9. Compatibility:

    • Fitbit wins in terms of compatibility, as it works with both iOS and Android devices.
    • Apple Watch is limited to the iPhone lineup but excels in integration with Apple devices.
  10. Battery Life:

    • Fitbit is the clear winner in battery life, lasting significantly longer on a single charge compared to Apple Watch.
  11. Waterproofing:

    • While both Fitbit and Apple Watch are swim-proof, the Apple Watch Ultra stands out with enhanced durability for water sports.
  12. Extra Features:

    • Apple Watch offers a broader range of extra features, including safety features, a built-in compass, and advanced connectivity options.
  13. Price Range:

    • Fitbit provides a more diverse range of products in terms of price and features, catering to various budgets.
    • Apple Watch is pricier, reflecting its additional features and integration with the Apple ecosystem.
  14. Choosing Between Fitbit and Apple Watch:

    • The choice depends on individual preferences, goals, and budget.
    • Fitbit is recommended for its variety, better battery life, and compatibility with both iOS and Android.
    • Apple Watch is favored for seamless integration with iPhones and a comprehensive set of features, making it suitable for those seeking an all-in-one smartwatch.
  15. Why Trust Verywell Fit:

    • Christine Luff, a certified personal trainer and running coach, brings over 20 years of experience in health and fitness content creation.
    • The article is grounded in practical testing and reviews, providing reliable insights for individuals seeking fitness trackers.

In conclusion, the detailed analysis of Fitbit and Apple Watch in the article is well-supported by practical testing, ensuring readers can make informed decisions based on their specific needs and preferences.

Fitbit vs Apple Watch: We Tried Them Both to See Which One Is Worth Your Money (2024)
Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Tyson Zemlak

Last Updated:

Views: 6400

Rating: 4.2 / 5 (63 voted)

Reviews: 94% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Tyson Zemlak

Birthday: 1992-03-17

Address: Apt. 662 96191 Quigley Dam, Kubview, MA 42013

Phone: +441678032891

Job: Community-Services Orchestrator

Hobby: Coffee roasting, Calligraphy, Metalworking, Fashion, Vehicle restoration, Shopping, Photography

Introduction: My name is Tyson Zemlak, I am a excited, light, sparkling, super, open, fair, magnificent person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.