The company said it was deeply concerned by reports of potential human rights abuse.
ADVERTIsem*nT
Swedish fashion brand H&M has ended an ‘“indirect” relationship with a cotton supplier in China after allegations of “forced labour”.
It comes after lawyers and human rights advocates delivered a 60-page document to UK customs authorities earlier this year which contained “overwhelming and credible evidence” of “the forced labour regime in Xinjiang”. The document urged the UK government to ban the import of “cotton goods produced with forced labour in China”.
In a statement, H&M said that it was “deeply concerned” by reports of “forced labour and discrimination of ethnoreligious minorities in Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region (XUAR)”.
The company stated that it prohibits any type of forced labour in its supply chain, “regardless of the country or region” and would take immediate action to terminate business relationships if this was found to have occurred.
H&M also added that it had also carried out an inquiry to ensure that workers on “labour transfer programmes or employment schemes” weren’t being brought from the region to work in factories it uses in other parts of China.
The statement emphasised that the brand does not “work with any garment manufacturing factories located in XUAR, and we do not source products from this region”. It disputes claims made by a recent report from the Australian Strategic Policy Institute that it has ever had a business relationship with a cotton mill “where workers from XUAR have been employed”.
H&M has, however, decided to phase out an indirect relationship with the company that owns this mill, Huafu Fashion Co. as a precaution.
Until recently, the company sourced cotton from farms in XUAR which were associated with the Better Cotton Initiative (BCI). In January this year, BCI suspended operations in the region due to concerns over human rights abuses which H&M says has made it difficult to “conduct credible due diligence”.
What’s going on in Xinjiang?
The UN believes that Xinjiang is the location of potential human rights violations against Muslim minorities. UN experts and human rights groups estimate that Chinese authorities have detained at least one million Uyghur and other Turkic Muslims.
China insists that these camps are voluntary and claim it is a necessary measure to prevent terrorism, but has been accused of exaggerating the threat to justify its actions.
Uyghurs are reportedly being held in detention centres that the government has described as “re-education camps”, which frequently include job training.
Rights groups say that once people “graduate” from these camps, they are sent to work in factories, live in dormitories where they are under surveillance 24 hours a day and cannot return to their homes.
China produces a fifth of the world's cotton and more than 80 per cent of that comes from Xinjiang. According to a report by the Centre for Strategic and International Studies, state documents indicate the government is “significantly increasing” the production of textiles and clothes, in part through the use of underpaid workers.
As an expert in global supply chain practices and corporate responsibility, I have a deep understanding of the complex dynamics involved in the sourcing and production processes of multinational companies. My extensive knowledge is not only theoretical but is also grounded in practical experience, having worked closely with various industries to ensure ethical and sustainable practices.
Now, let's delve into the article discussing H&M's decision to end an "indirect" relationship with a cotton supplier in China amid allegations of forced labor and human rights abuses in the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region (XUAR).
1. Forced Labor Allegations: The core issue revolves around allegations of forced labor in Xinjiang, where a 60-page document was presented to UK customs authorities, containing what is described as "overwhelming and credible evidence" of a forced labor regime. The article highlights the concerns raised by lawyers and human rights advocates regarding the situation in Xinjiang.
2. H&M's Response: H&M's response is crucial to understanding the company's stance on the matter. The Swedish fashion brand expressed deep concern about reports of forced labor and discrimination in Xinjiang. The company explicitly stated its prohibition of any form of forced labor in its supply chain, irrespective of the location, and emphasized its commitment to taking immediate action to terminate business relationships if such practices were identified.
3. Investigation and Business Relationship Termination: To address the allegations, H&M conducted an inquiry to ensure that labor transfer programs or employment schemes did not involve workers from Xinjiang being brought to work in other parts of China. The company, while denying a direct business relationship with garment manufacturing factories in XUAR, decided to phase out an indirect relationship with the company that owns a cotton mill implicated in the allegations, Huafu Fashion Co., as a precautionary measure.
4. Better Cotton Initiative (BCI) Suspension: The article also mentions that until recently, H&M sourced cotton from farms in XUAR associated with the Better Cotton Initiative (BCI). However, BCI suspended operations in the region in January due to concerns over human rights abuses, making it challenging for H&M to conduct credible due diligence.
5. Xinjiang Human Rights Situation: The broader context of the article touches upon the human rights situation in Xinjiang, where the UN and human rights groups have raised concerns about potential violations against Muslim minorities. The Chinese government's response, claiming the camps are voluntary and necessary to prevent terrorism, is contrasted with allegations of mass detentions and forced labor.
6. China's Cotton Production and Labor Practices: China's significant role as a global cotton producer is highlighted, with the country producing a fifth of the world's cotton, and over 80% of that coming from Xinjiang. The Center for Strategic and International Studies report indicates the Chinese government's efforts to increase textile and clothing production, potentially relying on underpaid workers.
In conclusion, the article provides a comprehensive overview of the complexities surrounding the allegations of forced labor in Xinjiang, H&M's response, and the broader issues related to human rights and labor practices in the global fashion industry.
