How do you estimate software project budgets using the three-point estimation method? (2024)

Three point estimation use 3 different values (optimistic,most likely& pessimistic)to calculate cost or budget on activity.PERT has 3 formulas will be used to calculate cost or budget.1.Beta distribution=O+4*M+P/62.Standard deviation(mostly gives the range of estimates)=P-O/63.Triangular distribution =O+M+P/3This is mainly based on assumptions or historical data & cannot define accurate budget

(edited)

Estimating software project budgets using the three-point estimation method involves considering three different estimates for the various cost components of the project. These estimates are the optimistic, most likely, and pessimistic scenarios for each cost item.

Typically three point estimation methodology would work for small and short term projects. It will especially help in this method if you have a well defined OKR for the project. This assumes that the scope of the project is defined and frozen...so you are able follow a waterfall methodology for project execution. A time bound, fixed fee and fixed deliverables project are ideal for these type of estimates.

To calculate the three-point estimate, two common formulas are used: the Triangular Distribution and the PERT (Program Evaluation and Review Technique) Distribution.Triangular Distribution: This is a simple average of the three estimates (O+M+P)/3.PERT Distribution: This weighted average places more emphasis on the most likely estimate (O+4M+P)/6).The choice between these depends on the project's risk profile and the manager's preference for accuracy versus simplicity.

(edited)

To estimate the software project budget using the three-point method, I start by identifying all the tasks and activities involved in the project. Then, for each task, I gather three estimates: the optimistic estimate (O), the most likely estimate (M), and the pessimistic estimate (P). Next, I apply the weighted average formula: Expected = (O + 4M + P) / 6 to calculate the expected duration or cost for each task. Finally, I sum up the expected values for all tasks to obtain the total project budget estimate. This approach allows me to account for uncertainties and risks inherent in software development projects, providing a more realistic and reliable budget projection.

Break Down the Project: List all tasks or activities required to complete the project.Estimate Each Task: Apply the three-point estimation method to each task, calculating O, M, and P based on historical data, expert judgment, or assumptions.Calculate the Overall Estimate: Use either the triangular or PERT formula to calculate a three-point estimate for each task.Sum Up the Estimates: Add up the three-point estimates of all tasks to get the total project budget estimate.Consider Variance and Standard Deviation: Optionally, calculate the standard deviation and variance for the project's budget estimate to understand potential deviations from the expected value.

The benefits of the three-point estimation method include:Improved Accuracy: By considering the best, most likely, and worst scenarios, the method provides a more realistic range of project outcomes.Flexibility: It allows for adjustments based on varying levels of uncertainty and risk.Risk Management: Helps in identifying tasks with the highest variability, guiding risk management efforts.Stakeholder Confidence: Providing a range rather than a single point estimate can increase stakeholder confidence in the project's budget and timeline predictions.

The three-point estimation technique enhances project management by providing more accurate estimates through considering best-case (Optimistic), worst-case (Pessimistic), and most likely scenarios. It improves risk management by identifying potential variability and uncertainty, enabling better contingency planning. This method balances estimates by weighting towards the most likely outcome, boosting stakeholder confidence with realistic expectations. It offers analytical insights into uncertainty levels, guiding decision-making and risk mitigation efforts. Additionally, its flexibility across time, cost, and resource estimates makes it a versatile tool for improving project outcomes and setting realistic expectations

Despite its advantages, the three-point estimation method has limitations:Data and Effort Intensive: Requires significant effort and data to produce accurate estimates.Subjectivity: Relies heavily on expert judgment, which can introduce bias.Assumption-Driven: The accuracy of the estimates depends on the validity of the underlying assumptions.Complexity in Large Projects: Aggregating and analyzing estimates for very large projects can be complex and time-consuming.

Limitations of Three-Point Estimation Method• Subjectivity: Estimates are still based on human judgment and can vary widely between individuals.• Time-Consuming: Gathering and analyzing three estimates for each task can be labor-intensive.• Complexity: Calculating and managing three estimates per task may complicate the estimation process.

When using the three-point estimation method for software project budgets, involve stakeholders and subject matter experts to enhance accuracy and buy-in. Regularly review and update estimates as the project progresses, considering changes in requirements and external factors. Leverage historical data and lessons learned to refine future estimates. By incorporating these considerations, we enhance the reliability and effectiveness of budget estimations for software projects.

Using three point estimations are best for projects that have been completed previously with historical metrics and data points. Projects that are being first completed do not provide the data needed to perform the estimations. These types for projects may be better completed using a time box approach or estimate in iteration, e.g., Swag, 50% confidence, then to 10%.