GLAMOUR reached out to Rihanna’s stylist Jahleel Weaver for confirmation on whether Rihanna's vintage fur coat was real fur or not but received no reply. We've since seen that the coat is tagged as Lab2022 on his Instagram feed. Lab2022 is an exclusive archive of Tom Ford-era Gucci and Yves Saint Laurent pieces curated by collector Neil Leonard and the coat in question dates from Karl Lagerfeld’s own collection for Fall 1987 (and it is real fur.)
As Rihanna's vintage fur coat is 36 year old pre-loved piece, does that negate the ethical questions? PETA disagrees. Earlier this year the animal rights organisation sent Rihanna a fake fur coat to replace her real ones and wrote an open letter requesting she stop wearing real fur. (Although rewind three years previously and PETA actually gave Rihanna a Compassion in Fashion award for Fenty’s faux leather collection…).
A similar conversation has been raised over the last few days, after Hailey Bieber jetted to Aspen in Colorado with her husband, Justin, and best friend, Kendall Jenner.
Instagram content
This content can also be viewed on the site it originates from.
Seemingly unafraid of the chill in the air, Hailey posted a series of photos on Instagram wearing a tiny a new season two-piece from N°.21's Spring/Summer 2024 runway. But it was her choice of outerwear that is raising eyebrows.
Hailey in Aspen, 2024
Roberto Cavalli, AW05 Runway
A dramatic feathered coat from Roberto Cavalli’s autumn/winter 2005 collection - originally worn on the runway by Australian supermodel, Gemma Ward - the piece has reignited the question as to the ethical implications - and occasional forgiveness - of such fabrics when they have not been made or recently purchased ‘as new’.
Emma Håkansson, Founding Director of Collective Fashion Justice, explains the ethics around vintage fur. “Of course wearing vintage fur doesn’t directly contribute to suffering in the way that purchasing and wearing new fur does, but it perpetuates the acceptability of the latter. As a result, wearing an animal’s skin, regardless of where it’s come from, can be a slippery slope back to popularising cruel fashion, particularly when the wearer has such great influence.”
It’s also essential to look beyond the aesthetics and discover the deeper meanings behind Rihanna’s own outfit choices… Nova Reid is author of The Good Ally and runs an anti-racism course and explains, “There is a history of Black women wearing fur, particularly in America, where Black Americans weren’t allowed, by law, to buy a home so acquiring fur was often used as a symbol of status. Historically, when you are denigrated because of your social status, the way you look and the colour of your skin, you try to have proximity to belonging. For Black women, fur was seen as an investment.”
Read More
If fur is killing animals and faux-fur is killing the planet, what on earth should you do?
There are similar questions being asked in silk and leather industries.
![If fur and feathers are vintage, does that make it OK? (2) If fur and feathers are vintage, does that make it OK? (2)](https://i0.wp.com/media.glamourmagazine.co.uk/photos/61389c861145ea59e77e69ff/1:1/w_775%2Cc_limit/44_smc_a20_lookbook_2000x3000_sq.jpg)
So, on the biggest night of the year for the the fashion industry, there could be nuance behind Rihanna's choice of vintage fur? “I’ve seen disproportionate reactions to Black women where there is policing of their commercial choices, what they wear, their looks and their behaviour," Nova says. "We are human beings and we are allowed to make choices. That includes ones that are poor or that might give offence to others but disproportionate reactions need to be looked at with curiosity."
For more from Glamour UK's Fashion Editor Charlie Teather, follow her on Instagram @charlieteather.
For more from Alex Fullerton, follow her on Instagram @alexandrafullerton