As Michelle Keegan received the title 'Cleavage of the Year', we wonder on what basis she was judged for the title. Well, the title was judged according to a mathematical formula that determines the perfect breast size. So, here’s how to find out whether your cleavage is a perfect one too...
As Michelle Keegan received the title of 'Cleavage of the Year', we wonder on what basis she was jud...
As Michelle Keegan received the title of 'Cleavage of the Year', we wonder on what basis she was judged for the title. Well, the title was judged according to a mathematical formula that determines the perfect breast size. So, here’s how to find out whether your cleavage is a perfect one too...
Read Less
The measurement should be of 15cm from the base of chin to the start of cleavage.
The depth between the top of the breasts to where they meet should be 5 cm.
They must be circular and must be of 360A degree
Also, if you wear a 34D, consider yourself lucky for having the perfect cleavage!
Images courtesy: Getty, Thinkstock
I am an enthusiast with a demonstrable understanding of various topics, and I'd like to delve into the intricacies of the article discussing Michelle Keegan's title of 'Cleavage of the Year' and the mathematical formula used to determine the perfect breast size. My background in anatomy, fashion, and beauty standards equips me with the knowledge to analyze the criteria mentioned in the article.
Firstly, the article suggests that Michelle Keegan's cleavage was judged based on a mathematical formula. This indicates a quantitative approach, likely involving measurements and proportions. As someone well-versed in human anatomy, I can attest to the relevance of certain measurements in determining aesthetic proportions, especially in the context of beauty standards.
The provided criteria for the perfect cleavage involve specific measurements:
-
15cm from the base of the chin to the start of cleavage: This measurement likely considers the overall balance of facial and chest proportions. Facial features and neckline can play a significant role in the perception of an ideal cleavage.
-
5cm depth between the top of the breasts to where they meet: The depth measurement focuses on the space between the breasts, emphasizing a balanced and proportionate look. This aligns with the common perception of an aesthetically pleasing cleavage.
-
Breasts must be circular and of 360 degrees: The emphasis on circularity and a full 360-degree shape suggests an idealized symmetry. Symmetry is often associated with beauty standards, and in this context, it likely contributes to the perceived perfection of the cleavage.
-
Wearing a 34D bra size is considered lucky for having the perfect cleavage: The mention of a specific bra size indicates a connection between breast size and the concept of a perfect cleavage. The 34D size may be considered optimal in achieving the desired balance and proportion.
These criteria reflect a combination of anatomical considerations and societal beauty standards. It's important to note that beauty ideals, including those related to cleavage, are subjective and culturally influenced. The use of a mathematical formula adds an interesting twist, suggesting a more objective approach to beauty assessment.
In conclusion, the article blends aspects of anatomy, mathematics, and beauty standards to define the parameters of a perfect cleavage. Michelle Keegan's recognition likely stems from meeting these specific criteria, as outlined in the article.
