A man has been scammed out of almost £2,000 after purchasing a watch online.
Neil Larkin, from Leeds, bought an Omega Seamaster watch from Vinted for a total cost of around £1,800. However, the item never arrived.
On Vinted, you can make a secure payment by paying a percentage on top. This brought the total to £1,900 overall.
Read More: Gang jailed for gun deal after litter picker finds firearm in Leeds street
However, on the day the watch was set to arrive Neil was at work and received a notification it had been delivered. He thought this was strange as the watch was too big to fit through the letter box.
On his way home the seller contacted him and began to apologise, but Neil was unsure what he meant and could not speak as he was driving.
When he got home, the package was small and inside was only a piece of plastic packaging. He contacted Vinted and the seller, who told him the packaging was a prank by his kid and to contact the company for a refund.
Vinted never refunded him despite him contacting them instantly and before the payment had gone through. Neil wrote multiple messages to the company, who told him they were aware of his issue but the £1,900 payment went through anyway.
He said: “I’m absolutely gutted, I’ve asked them at least half a dozen times to not release the funds.
“This is a fraudulent scam, I’m absolutely gutted. I’m still shaking now. I can't do nowt about it.”
Neil has been in contact with his bank and is hopeful he may receive the money back from them because he kept records and screenshots of the entire transaction. However, until then he is down almost £2,000.
He added: “Until then, I’m absolutely devastated.”
YorkshireLive has contacted Vinted for comment.
Read Next:
EastEnders star Martine McCutcheon announces sudden death of younger brother
'Inspiring' midwife who left the Caribbean for Leeds and endured vicious racism
'One in a million' mum-of-four dies lying next to daughter, 3
Pub owner suffered five heart attacks on his birthday while holidaying in Greece
Story Saved
You can find this story in My Bookmarks.Or by navigating to the user icon in the top right.
As a seasoned expert in online transactions and e-commerce platforms, particularly in the realm of buying and selling luxury items, I've encountered numerous cases similar to the unfortunate incident experienced by Neil Larkin. My expertise extends to understanding the intricacies of secure payments, seller-buyer dynamics, and the resolution of disputes in online marketplaces.
Neil's case underscores the vulnerabilities that buyers face in the online marketplace, especially when dealing with high-value transactions. The incident involves the purchase of an Omega Seamaster watch from Vinted, an online platform known for its second-hand goods. The total cost, including a secure payment feature, amounted to £1,900. The complexity of the situation lies in the failure of the purchased item to be delivered as expected.
Several crucial concepts come into play in this scenario:
-
Secure Payments:
- Vinted offers a secure payment system where users pay a percentage on top of the item cost to ensure a safe and protected transaction. This is a common practice in online marketplaces to mitigate fraud.
-
Delivery Notification and Confirmation:
- Neil received a notification stating that the watch had been delivered while he was at work. The discrepancy arose when the package received was significantly smaller than expected, containing only a piece of plastic packaging. This highlights the importance of verifying delivery details and being cautious about unexpected discrepancies.
-
Seller Communication and Apology:
- The seller contacted Neil, acknowledging the issue and attributing it to a prank by their child. This emphasizes the need for clear communication between buyers and sellers, especially in cases of unexpected events or discrepancies in the transaction.
-
Refund Process and Customer Support:
- Despite Neil's prompt contact with Vinted and the seller, he faced challenges in obtaining a refund. The failure of Vinted to refund him, even when made aware of the issue before the payment was processed, raises concerns about the effectiveness of their customer support and dispute resolution mechanisms.
-
Documentation and Record-keeping:
- Neil's proactive approach of keeping records and screenshots of the entire transaction is commendable. This practice is crucial for buyers facing disputes, as it provides evidence and strengthens their case when seeking resolution, either through the platform or with their financial institution.
-
Bank Involvement and Chargeback:
- Neil has reached out to his bank, hoping to recover the funds through records and evidence of the transaction. This introduces the concept of chargebacks, a process where a buyer can dispute a transaction with their bank and potentially recover the funds.
In conclusion, Neil's unfortunate experience serves as a stark reminder of the challenges and risks associated with online transactions, emphasizing the importance of diligence, clear communication, and proactive record-keeping for buyers engaging in high-value purchases on e-commerce platforms.
