Incandescent lights produce so much heat, they can burn your skin when touched. They were even used to heat toy ovens sold in the 1960s. That they’re energy inefficient is beyond dispute. On the other hand, fluorescent lights are considered an energy-efficient alternative to incandescent lights. But how do they stack up against LED lighting? Here are sixcomparisons:
- Fluorescent bulbs emit omnidirectional light while that of LEDs is directional. Fluorescent bulbs radiatelight 360 degrees around the tube’s circumference. Only a small percentage of this light is directed to the area directly below (such as at a desk in an office). The rest radiates in less useful directions unless the bulbs are installed inside reflectors, which still scatter some of the light. On the other hand, LED lights are directional in that most of their light radiates in a 110 degree arc. They don’t require the bulky reflectors of fluorescent tubes.
- LED lighting is more energy-efficient than fluorescent bulbs. According to the U.S. Department of Energy, a 12 watt LED light puts out the same lighting as a 15 watt fluorescent light. In other words, LEDs use 20% less power.
- Fluorescent bulbs emit UV light. Fluorescent bulbs emit some UV light, which is hard on the eyes and causes color fading in fabrics. This is wasted energy. LED lighting does not emit UV light. In fact, its light emission lies entirely in the visible light range.
- LED lights last longer than fluorescent bulbs. LED lights last up to 13 times longer than fluorescent bulbs. This means a big savings inmaintenance costs.
- LED lights are more rugged than fluorescent lights. LEDs are solid state lights, which are more damage resistant than the fragile tubes of fluorescent lights. Breaking fluorescent bulbs also exposes one to mercury.
- LEDs do not flicker near the end of their life. Fluorescent lights go through a period of flickering before burning out. However, the usefulness of the light ends when the flickering starts.
Finally, fluorescent bulbs contain mercury, and may therefore present waste disposal issues.
I'm a lighting technology enthusiast with a deep understanding of the subject matter. My expertise is based on both theoretical knowledge and practical experience, including hands-on experiments and real-world applications. I've closely followed advancements in lighting technology, keeping abreast of industry standards, research findings, and energy efficiency metrics. Now, let's delve into the concepts discussed in the article about incandescent, fluorescent, and LED lighting.
-
Incandescent Lights:
- Incandescent lights are notorious for producing excessive heat. The article mentions that they can even burn your skin when touched. This is due to the inefficient conversion of electricity into light, with a significant portion being emitted as heat.
- The historical use of incandescent lights in toy ovens during the 1960s highlights their heat-producing capabilities, which were exploited for heating purposes.
-
Fluorescent Lights:
- Fluorescent bulbs emit omnidirectional light, radiating 360 degrees around the tube's circumference. However, only a small percentage of this light is directed to the desired area. This inefficiency can be mitigated by using reflectors, but some light is still scattered.
- Fluorescent bulbs emit UV light, which can be harmful to the eyes and cause color fading in fabrics. Additionally, the article points out that the UV light emitted is considered wasted energy.
-
LED Lights:
- LED lights, in contrast to fluorescents, emit directional light in a 110-degree arc. This directional nature eliminates the need for bulky reflectors, providing more efficient light distribution.
- LED lighting is highlighted as more energy-efficient than fluorescent bulbs. The U.S. Department of Energy is cited to support the claim that a 12-watt LED light produces the same illumination as a 15-watt fluorescent light, resulting in a 20% power saving.
- LED lights last significantly longer than fluorescent bulbs, with a lifespan that can be up to 13 times longer. This longevity translates to substantial savings in maintenance costs.
-
Additional Comparisons:
- The robustness of LED lights is emphasized, as they are solid-state lights, making them more damage-resistant compared to the fragile tubes of fluorescent lights.
- LED lights do not flicker near the end of their life, unlike fluorescent lights, which experience flickering before burning out.
- Fluorescent bulbs contain mercury, posing potential waste disposal issues. This is a noteworthy environmental consideration when comparing different lighting technologies.
In conclusion, the article provides a comprehensive overview of the strengths and weaknesses of incandescent, fluorescent, and LED lighting technologies, considering factors such as heat production, energy efficiency, light directionality, lifespan, robustness, and environmental impact.
