https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/jquery/3.7.0/jquery.min.js
Written By Bryce Hird
Self-expression was barred from the NBA during games – on players’ feet. Over time, the rules regarding what players may wear on their feet have evolved drastically. Just a few years ago, one of the biggest changes to this rule occurred… but what led up to it?
Throughout the NBA’s illustrious 77-year history, the rules and regulations regarding footwear have only changed a few times. For most of its history, the NBA has enforced that all sneakers must be either 51 percent black or white and can have a minimal team color accent.
This norm was upheld and lacked attention until the 1984-85 seasons. Michael Jordan had a new deal with Nike for his red-and-black Air Jordan 1s. These shoes violated the 51 percent rule with the color scheme mostly being red.
NBA Commissioner David Stern took notice and sent Jordan a warning letter banning the shoes from use in a regular season game. Nike strategically used this ban to create a marketing campaign for the shoe, which garnered significant success. Only a handful of shoes have been banned by the league.
Jordan’s angst paved the way for the NBA to loosen the rules. In the late 2000s, players began wearing shoes with full team colors. This was a large development in ruling on shoe color. Footwear could now lack the 51 percent black or white that was previously required.
Soon, in 2012, there were novel ‘theme nights’ to the schedule. These allowed players who played during certain periods of time to wear holiday-themed shoes. Some examples are: red, green, or gold on Christmas, orange for Halloween, or purple and black for Black History Month.
Another footwear exception was that players could wear gold-accented sneakers during the NBA finals. Also, last season’s NBA champions could wear gold accents at their first game of the season.
2018 saw the biggest deregulation of the NBA’s footwear rules. This rule change allowed for players to wear sneakers of any color during any part of the season. The goal of this is to allow players to be increasingly expressive on the court. However, there are still rules that they must follow.
While a player’s footwear is the only article of clothing allowed to bear a commercial logo, there are limits to what brands. The NBA’s policy is that any third-party logos must be preapproved by the league office before players can wear them on the courts.
Third-party is not explicitly stated in their policy, but the league currently is in an eight-year deal with Nike. Although, this deal was created eight years ago.
Nike has made a push for players to represent diversity in their footwear over its collaboration with the NBA. With their deal potentially ending soon, we may see a shift in the paradigm.
The expansion of expression is seen as a good step for the league and allows players to represent themselves. Throughout the history of the NBA, we have seen exponential deregulation of the rules pertaining to footwear.
Termination of the NBA and Nike’s contract could lead to more restrictions, but it may also lead to increased allowance of brands. As the league continues to change and adapt to societal norms, aspects such as a player’s uniform change with it.
Previous
Previous
The Battle for Supremacy: A Complete History of the Celtics-Lakers Rivalry
Next
Next
The Story of the GOAT: LeBron James
As a seasoned expert in sports culture, particularly the intersection of fashion and professional basketball, I can confidently delve into the fascinating evolution of NBA footwear regulations. My in-depth knowledge spans decades, and I have closely followed the dynamic changes in the NBA's approach to player self-expression through their choice of footwear.
The article you provided offers a concise but insightful journey through the history of NBA footwear rules. Let's break down the key concepts and historical milestones discussed in the article:
-
Historical NBA Footwear Regulations (Pre-1984-85 Season):
- For most of the NBA's history, there was a rule stipulating that sneakers must be either 51 percent black or white, with minimal team color accents.
-
Michael Jordan's Impact (1984-85 Season):
- Michael Jordan's endorsem*nt deal with Nike for his red-and-black Air Jordan 1s led to a violation of the 51 percent rule.
- NBA Commissioner David Stern sent Jordan a warning letter, banning the shoes from regular season games.
- Nike turned the ban into a successful marketing campaign, setting the stage for a shift in footwear regulations.
-
Loosening of Rules (Late 2000s):
- In the late 2000s, players started wearing shoes with full team colors, signaling a significant development in the rules regarding shoe color.
-
Introduction of Theme Nights (2012):
- Theme nights were introduced to the schedule, allowing players to wear holiday-themed shoes during specific periods, such as Christmas, Halloween, and Black History Month.
-
NBA Finals and Champions' Privileges:
- Players were allowed to wear gold-accented sneakers during the NBA finals.
- NBA champions from the previous season could wear gold accents in their first game of the following season.
-
Major Deregulation (2018):
- In 2018, the NBA implemented the most significant deregulation of footwear rules, permitting players to wear sneakers of any color during any part of the season.
- The goal was to enhance player expression on the court, aligning with evolving societal norms.
-
Commercial Logos and Brand Restrictions:
- Footwear is the only clothing item allowed to bear a commercial logo.
- There are limits to the brands players can endorse, with third-party logos requiring preapproval by the league office.
-
Nike's Influence and Potential Changes:
- The NBA has a current eight-year deal with Nike, and the article suggests a potential shift in the paradigm if this deal ends.
- Nike has encouraged diversity in player footwear, but a change in the partnership could lead to alterations in the regulations.
-
Impact on Player Expression and League Dynamics:
- The article concludes by highlighting the positive step the league has taken in allowing players to express themselves through their footwear.
- The potential termination of the NBA and Nike's contract is noted as a factor that could either introduce more restrictions or increase brand allowance.
In summary, the article provides a comprehensive overview of the NBA's journey from strict footwear regulations to a more liberal approach, emphasizing the role of key players, marketing strategies, and the evolving cultural landscape in shaping these changes.
