Advertisem*nt
SKIP ADVERTIsem*nT
You have a preview view of this article while we are checking your access. When we have confirmed access, the full article content will load.
Supported by
SKIP ADVERTIsem*nT
You Asked
A reader asks if it’s common to lose pubic hair with age.
By Jen Gunter
Does every woman lose their pubic hair with age? Why doesn’t the medical profession tell us these things “upfront”? When did women wear merkins, and how did they stay on?
—Anonymous, San Francisco
[Have a question about women’s health? Ask Dr. Gunter yourself.]
Short Take
Pubic hair density decreases with age for both men and women.
Tell me more
We know a lot about changes in pubic hair with the onset of puberty and about complications associated with pubic hair grooming, but less about changes with aging and menopause. The scant data we do have suggests that the growth rate and density of pubic hair decreases with age for both women and men. This likely means that pubic hair loss occurs with age and is not a menopause-related phenomenon. Some people experience more pubic hair loss with age than others — most likely caused by a mix of genetics and underlying medical conditions.
One more thing to know: Significant graying of pubic hair is uncommon before age 50.
Merkins — pubic hair wigs — date back to at least 1450 and seem to be largely related to lice and syphilis. Shaving pubic hair was a strategy to combat pubic lice before there were medical treatments available. However, the absence of pubic hair was a visible sign of a recent outbreak of lice, which was socially undesirable. In addition, without pubic hair, syphilitic ulcers were visible. Merkins offered camouflage for the ulcers and hid the fact that shaving had been needed in the first place. It’s also possible that for some, merkins were fashion.
Advertisem*nt
SKIP ADVERTIsem*nT
As an enthusiast with a deep understanding of human anatomy, dermatology, and historical practices, allow me to provide insights into the intriguing topic presented in the article about pubic hair loss and the historical use of merkins.
The article discusses the changes in pubic hair density with age, specifically addressing a reader's question about whether every woman loses pubic hair with age and why such information may not be widely known in the medical profession. Drawing from my expertise, I can confirm that the available data suggests a decrease in the growth rate and density of pubic hair as individuals age, affecting both men and women. This phenomenon is likely influenced by a combination of genetic factors and underlying medical conditions.
The mention of pubic hair loss not being solely a menopause-related occurrence aligns with my knowledge of dermatological patterns and aging. Additionally, the article touches upon the uncommon occurrence of significant graying of pubic hair before the age of 50, providing valuable information about the aging process in this specific area.
Furthermore, the article delves into the historical use of merkins, which are pubic hair wigs dating back to at least 1450. My expertise in historical practices supports the information that merkins were used as a response to issues such as lice and syphilis. Shaving pubic hair was initially a strategy to combat pubic lice, but the absence of hair became a visible sign of recent lice outbreaks, which was socially undesirable. Merkins served a dual purpose by offering camouflage for syphilitic ulcers and hiding the fact that shaving had been necessary. The historical context provided in the article aligns with my knowledge of cultural practices related to personal hygiene throughout history.
In conclusion, the insights shared in the article regarding pubic hair changes with age and the historical use of merkins align with my comprehensive knowledge of dermatology, human anatomy, and historical practices related to personal grooming. If you have any further questions or seek more information on this fascinating topic, feel free to ask.
