Traditional Retirement Planning Is Dead (2024)

By Todd Tresidder

Advertising Disclosure

Financial Mentor has commercial relationships with certain companies we reference on this website. Opinions are ours alone, and we take a good faith approach to maintaining objectivity. If we wouldn’t use a product ourselves, we won’t recommend it. We strive to keep information accurate and up-to-date, however, all products are presented without warranty.

Financial Mentor has partnered with CardRatings for our coverage of credit card products. Financial Mentor and CardRatings may receive a commission from card issuers. Opinions, reviews, analyses & recommendations are the author’s alone, and have not been reviewed, endorsed or approved by any of these entities.

Reveals A Newer, Better Model To Achieve Financial Security

Key Ideas

  1. 3 little-known reasons traditional retirement planning failed.
  2. 8 surprising facts to help secure your financial future.
  3. What caused the retirement planning myth?

Traditional retirement planning has failed.

  • According to the New York Times, 75% of Americans have less than $30,000 in their retirement accounts, and 49% of middle-class workers will retire poor or near poor.
  • According to Hewitt Associates, 4 out of 5 workers will fail to meet all their financial needs in retirement.
  • Employee Benefit Research Institute reports that 81% of workers nearing retirement age (45 or older) have less than $250,000 in savings and an astounding 48% have accumulated less than $25,000 as they approach retirement.
  • Only 64% of American workers are confident they will have enough money to retire according the annual Retirement Confidence Survey.

The evidence is overwhelming that something is wrong with traditional retirement planning. It’s an old world model in need of a major facelift.

The problem is baked into how the retirement system is designed—it’s not realistic.

The skills and knowledge required to successfully execute a traditional retirement plan are beyond most worker’s abilities:

  • You must voluntarily save a significant portion of your income with discipline throughout your career (8%–30%, depending on the age you begin saving).
  • You mustdevelop sufficient investment expertise to implement smart asset allocation and investment decisions.
  • You must know in advance when you and your spouse will die to know how much savings are required.
  • You must know in advance when you will end work—either voluntarily, due to sickness, or possibly because of lay-offs out of your control.
  • You must know what the future inflation rate will be over your remaining life (even though trained economists can’t accurately predict this number even one year in advance).
  • You must know what your investment portfolio will return over your remaining life (even though nobody can predict this number for one year, not to mention 30 years).
  • You must be disciplined enough to never raid your retirement nest egg when adversity strikes, like getting laid off, health problems, kid’s college, or getting divorced.
  • And then, to top it all off, you’re supposed to manage your retirement savings so that you spend your last dollar as you exhale your last breath.

Traditional retirement planning is dead. It requires an absurd list of skills and knowledge that few have.

Click To Tweet

Yeah, right! No wonder most workers are failing at retirement planning.

It's an almost unbelievable list of skills and knowledge that few, if any, workers possess.

Related: Why you need a wealth plan, not a financial plan.

It requires you to have the savings discipline of a celibate monk living in a brothel, investment skills that exceed most pension and mutual fund professionals, and the actuarial skills of an insurance expert.

That sounds like pretty demanding standards for someone who aspires to quit work.

Traditional retirement planning is a broken model.

The system is failing people because the absurd list of skills required to succeed is unrealistic.

Get This Article Sent to Your Inbox as a PDF…

Walking the Talk Makes All The Difference

The reason the broken model persists is because most “retirement experts” that teach this stuff have no real experience being “retired”, living off their portfolio, and surviving without earned income.

Reality is very different from theory: the retirement map most experts teach is not the territory.

After “retiring” more than two decades ago and raising a family of four with almost no earned income, I can tell you that retirement living isn’t nearly as neat and clean as the sterile books would (mis)lead you to believe.

See My Related Book…

I’ve survived multiple bubbles in stocks andreal estate (and probably bonds someday soon), and the conventional rules of thumb are hazardous to your wealth.

Below are some particularly important ideas you’re not likely to hear about from a traditional financial planner at your next retirement planning meeting.

Increasing Longevity Has Changed The Rules

Life expectancy is increasing every year, and the higher income classes can expect the greatest longevity in old age. If you have the wealth to fund a secure retirement, then you should also expect to outlive the averages (unless your genetics indicate otherwise).

90% confidence intervals for a healthy couple at age 65 are already growing past the age 100 barrier. In other words, forget the statistical averages. You must financially prepare to live far longer than anyone would tell you, because the alternative is to risk outliving your money, and that's not acceptable.

Spending Principal Is Dangerous

When your assets have to survive 30 years or more, it means you cannot safely spend investment principal like conventional retirement planning would indicate.

This means you must live on portfolio income exclusively during the early years, because there is no safe way to amortize principal over a 30+ year time horizon, given all the unknown variables (see The 4% Rule and Safe Withdrawal Rates for more detail).

That requires you to amass a much larger investment portfolio than traditional retirement planning would indicate, or consider alternative portfolios to produce inflation adjusting income and growth.

Inflation Is Your Number One Enemy

Inflation is the number one nemesis of retirees. That’s because a retiree is, by definition, a saver, and inflation is the cancer that consumes savings.

Inflation is all the more insidious because you have no control over it, can hardly detect it from year to year, cannot estimate it accurately, and small differences will compound over many years to potentially double the amount of money you need to safely retire. Inflation is one of the top risk factors to your financial security.

It's Tough To Grow Purchasing Power While Living Off Savings

It's exceedingly difficult to grow a portfolio fast enough using conventional, passiveasset allocation to increase your saving’s purchasing power net of inflation, lifestyle expenses, volatility effects, and the inevitable mistakes and surprises of life.

Few people grow their portfolios faster than inflation after subtracting just transaction costs, mistakes, and other issues. When you start subtracting lifestyle expenses from your savings, the hurdle is extraordinarily difficult to clear.

The Average Return Lie

The big reason it's so difficult to grow your assets net of inflation, spending, mistakes, and investment expenses is the “average return lie”.

The experts love to quote average historical returns, but the only return you can actually spend is thecompound return.

Related: 5 Financial Planning Mistakes That Cost You Big-Time (and what to do instead!) Explained in 5 Free Video Lessons

Average returns are a statistical fiction. The seldom-told truth is that compound returns are always less than average returns, and the culprit is volatility. The greater the volatility, the greater the difference between average return and compound return.

For example, if your investments are up 50% one year, and down 50% next year, then the average return is break-even, but your account actually lost 25% when compounded. The 25% loss is the only return that matters to a real retiree, and it's caused by the volatility effect.

Sequence Of Returns Risk

Now that you understand the volatility effect, let’s add insult to injury by introducing sequence of returns risk. You will quickly see why living off your retirement nest egg is more risky than commonly understood.

Imagine an adverse period of returns that runs a decade or more. This occurs regularly in actual market history with the most recent example beginning in 2000.

If you started your retirement in 2000 with a conventional passive indexed portfolio, and supported living expenses from assets according to the conventional 4% rule, you would have incurred a portfolio drawdown just from spending that exceeded 50% (not to mention investment mistakes, investment expenses, volatility effects on compound return, and more).

Given the dismal investment returns over the same time period, your monthly spending would be approaching or exceeding 10% of assets (depending on assumptions), which is unsustainable and certainly not safe.

Related: How to make more from your investing by risking less

This isn't some theoretical mumbo-jumbo. It happened to countless real-world retirees who relied on conventional wisdom and got burned. It results from an adverse sequence of investment returns like we've had since 2000.

Research shows this sequence of returns risk during the first 10-15 years of retirement accounts for 80% (or more) of the variance in safe withdrawal rates during retirement.

It's incredibly important to understand, yet few retirees do. If you need more guidance, our step-by-step wealth planning course can get you on the right track so youcan guarantee your retirement security.

Poverty Consciousness

The process of living off your assets with no earned income creates a poverty mentality for anyone successful and actuarially minded enough to build the wealth in the first place.

It causes a feeling of lack, even though you're surrounded by a plentiful portfolio. It is why you see multi-millionaire elderly people in their 80’s pinching pennies and refusing to enjoy their money, even though they couldn’t spend it all if they tried.

It's difficult to understand until you live it. Basically, your financial reality narrows when you become 100% dependent on your assets with zero earned income. The result is tragic: a poverty experience, even though you're surrounded by abundance.

Forget The Cliches About Retirement Happiness

Finally, a satisfying retirement isn’t anything like the clichés indicate. A fulfilling life is built on much more than endless rounds of golf and little umbrella drinks under a palm tree at sunset.

I’ve tried all extremes from workaholic to pro-leisure circuit, and everything in-between. In my experience, the most satisfying retirement includes a lifestyle business that produces some income without inhibiting the freedom to do what you want with your life.

It takes pressure off your assets and relieves the poverty mentality while providing a sense of purpose, community, mental stimulation, contribution, and social connection (that's why I provide money coaching services).

Vacations are more enjoyable when contrasted with meaningful work. The truth is, work provides underrated benefits during retirement, because most people need something more to wake up for than just personal self-indulgence.

Traditional Retirement Planning Is Dead (6)

Retirement Summary

If you want to learn more about how the financial aspects of retirement planning work, make sure to pick up my latest book:How Much Money Do I Need To Retire?

Retirement planning doesn’t work in practice like most experts preach. The differences aren’t small either. They are game changing.

From saving, to investing, to life planning, the retirement experience operates under a set of rules very different from what is commonly believed.

In the comments below, please add to this discussion by sharing your experience with traditional retirement planning.

  • How will your retirement differ from your parents and grandparents?
  • What has worked for you in traditional retirement planning, and what hasn't?
  • What are some of your favorite ideas in retirement planning?

I'd really like to know what you think about these ideas…

The One Decision That Can Make Or Break Your Financial Future

There are only four paths you can choose from.

Click below to find out which path is best for you, and why.

Yes! Tell Me About Expectancy Wealth Planning strategy

Want a PDF of this article? We'll email it to you!

Related...

12 Tips To Build Wealth For Early Retirement

27 Retirement Savings Catch-Up Strategies For Late Starters

5 Ways To Reduce How Much You Need To Save For Retirement By $300,000 (or More!)

8 Shortcuts For A Simple Retirement Plan In Record Time

FM 002: How To Retire At 50 with Darrow Kirkpatrick

FM 010: How To Engineer Your Wealth Using Retirement Calculators With Darrow Kirkpatrick

Pension News: You're on Your Own For Retirement

Preparing For Retirement - The 5 Essential Questions

Retirement Savings Statistics Are Ugly

The Smart Alternative To Retirement Planning

Simple Retirement Savings Calculator

Ultimate Retirement Calculator

Traditional Retirement Planning Is Dead (2024)

FAQs

Traditional Retirement Planning Is Dead? ›

Traditional retirement at 65 or what Tim Ferris calls the “deferred life plan” is dead. With the invention of the 401k in the 1970's the retirement income risk was shifted from the employer to the employee and so jobs with good pensions are extremely rare to find.

What is the $1000 a month rule for retirement? ›

One example is the $1,000/month rule. Created by Wes Moss, a Certified Financial Planner, this strategy helps individuals visualize how much savings they should have in retirement. According to Moss, you should plan to have $240,000 saved for every $1,000 of disposable income in retirement.

Why are Millennials not saving for retirement? ›

There are many reasons for this, such as a shift away from pensions toward 401(k) plans and high student debt burdens. However, there are also reasons for optimism, such as advances in 401(k) plan design.

Why are pensions disappearing? ›

Traditional pension plans have been on the decline, primarily due to the economic strain they place on companies. Employers often bear the heavy responsibility of fully funding these plans; a task made more challenging by unpredictable market volatility and fluctuating investment returns.

What is the 4% rule in retirement planning? ›

What does the 4% rule do? It's intended to make sure you have a safe retirement withdrawal rate and don't outlive your savings in your final years. By pulling out only 4% of your total funds and allowing the rest of your investments to continue to grow, you can budget a safe withdrawal rate for 30 years or more.

How long will $500,000 last year in retirement? ›

If you withdraw $20,000 from the age of 60, $500k will last for over 30 years. Retirement plans, annuities and Social Security benefits should all be considered when planning your future finances. You can retire at 50 with $500k, but it will take a lot of planning and some savvy decision-making.

Can you retire at 60 with $300 000? ›

In most cases $300,000 is simply not enough money on which to retire early. If you retire at age 60, you will have to live on your $15,000 drawdown and nothing more. This is close to the $12,760 poverty line for an individual and translates into a monthly income of about $1,250 per month.

Why are employers getting rid of pensions? ›

Companies offering pensions also dealt with increasing complexities involved with managing the funds and recordkeeping. “As more scrutiny and oversight was placed on pension funds, companies started to shy away from offering the benefit and opting for a more hands-off defined contribution plan,” Johnson said.

What percentage of US citizens have pensions? ›

Of course, these figures reflect the situation of people who have retirement accounts, though about a quarter of Americans don't. For those who do, 54% have employer-sponsored accounts and 48% having savings in non-retirement accounts. A smaller percentage (21%) have pensions.

Are pension plans making a comeback? ›

While pensions have lost ground in recent years to 401(k) plans, experts say they may be ready for a comeback of sorts. Not only are employers thinking about adding or unfreezing pensions, they are also considering modernizing and diversifying the accounts to make them more attractive and flexible for employees.

Which is the biggest expense for most retirees? ›

Housing—which includes mortgage, rent, property tax, insurance, maintenance and repair costs—is the largest expense for retirees. More specifically, the average retiree household pays an average of $17,472 per year ($1,456 per month) on housing expenses, representing almost 35% of annual expenditures.

What is a good monthly retirement income? ›

More? Financial planners often recommend replacing about 80% of your pre-retirement income to sustain the same lifestyle after you retire. This means that, if you earn $100,000 per year, you'd aim for at least $80,000 of income (in today's dollars) in retirement.

How many people have $1,000,000 in retirement savings? ›

In fact, statistically, around 10% of retirees have $1 million or more in savings. The majority of retirees, however, have far less saved.

How much does the average retired person live on per month? ›

Retirement Income Varies Widely By State
StateAverage Retirement Income
California$34,737
Colorado$32,379
Connecticut$32,052
Delaware$31,283
47 more rows
Oct 30, 2023

Can you live off $3000 a month in retirement? ›

That means that even if you're not one of those lucky few who have $1 million or more socked away, you can still retire well, so long as you keep your monthly budget under $3,000 a month.

How many years will $300 000 last in retirement? ›

Let's say your annual retirement spending is $20,000, equivalent to $1,666 monthly. In this scenario, $300,000 can last for roughly 26 years. The length of time that you can make $300,000 last as a retiree is best determined by looking at your intended retirement lifestyle and likely monthly and annual outgoings.

How much do I need in a 401k to get $2000 a month? ›

With the $1,000 per month rule, if you plan to withdraw 5% of your savings each year, you'll need at least $240,000 in savings. If you aim to take out $2,000 every month at a withdrawal rate of 5%, you'll need to set aside $480,000. For $3,000, you would aim to save $720,000.

Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Merrill Bechtelar CPA

Last Updated:

Views: 5861

Rating: 5 / 5 (70 voted)

Reviews: 93% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Merrill Bechtelar CPA

Birthday: 1996-05-19

Address: Apt. 114 873 White Lodge, Libbyfurt, CA 93006

Phone: +5983010455207

Job: Legacy Representative

Hobby: Blacksmithing, Urban exploration, Sudoku, Slacklining, Creative writing, Community, Letterboxing

Introduction: My name is Merrill Bechtelar CPA, I am a clean, agreeable, glorious, magnificent, witty, enchanting, comfortable person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.