- Quantitative Dissertations
- Introduction
- Route #1
- Dissertation Essentials
- Topics
- Titles
- Abstract
- Acknowledgements
- Research limitations
- Research Strategy
- Sampling Strategy
- Research Quality
- Research Ethics
- Data Analysis
FUTURE RESEARCH
Types of future research suggestion
The Future Research section of your dissertation is often combined with the Research Limitations section of your final, Conclusions chapter. This is because your future research suggestions generally arise out of the research limitations you have identified in your own dissertation. In this article, we discuss six types of future research suggestion. These include: (1) building on a particular finding in your research; (2) addressing a flaw in your research; examining (or testing) a theory (framework or model) either (3) for the first time or (4) in a new context, location and/or culture; (5) re-evaluating and (6) expanding a theory (framework or model). The goal of the article is to help you think about the potential types of future research suggestion that you may want to include in your dissertation.
Before we discuss each of these types of future research suggestion, we should explain why we use the word examining and then put or testing in brackets. This is simply because the word examining may be considered more appropriate when students use a qualitative research design; whereas the word testing fits better with dissertations drawing on a quantitative research design. We also put the words framework or model in brackets after the word theory. We do this because a theory, framework and model are not the same things. In the sections that follow, we discuss six types of future research suggestion.
- Addressing research limitations in your dissertation
- Building on a particular finding or aspect of your research
- Examining a conceptual framework (or testing a theoretical model) for the first time
- Examining a conceptual framework (or testing a theoretical model) in a new context, location and/or culture
- Expanding a conceptual framework (or testing a theoretical model)
- Re-evaluating a conceptual framework (or theoretical model)
Addressing research limitations in your dissertation
In the Research Limitations section of your Conclusions chapter, you will have inevitably detailed the potential flaws (i.e., research limitations) of your dissertation. These may include:
An inability to answer your research questions
Theoretical and conceptual problems
Limitations of your research strategy
Problems of research quality
Identifying what these research limitations were and proposing future research suggestions that address them is arguably the easiest and quickest ways to complete the Future Research section of your Conclusions chapter.
Building on a particular finding or aspect of your research
Often, the findings from your dissertation research will highlight a number of new avenues that could be explored in future studies. These can be grouped into two categories:
Findings that you did not anticipate
Your dissertation will inevitably lead to findings that you did not anticipate from the start. These are useful when making future research suggestions because they can lead to entirely new avenues to explore in future studies. If this was the case, it is worth (a) briefly describing what these unanticipated findings were and (b) suggesting a research strategy that could be used to explore such findings in future.
Factors that address unanswered aspects of your research questions
Sometimes, dissertations manage to address all aspects of the research questions that were set. However, this is seldom the case. Typically, there will be aspects of your research questions that could not be answered. This is not necessarily a flaw in your research strategy, but may simply reflect that fact that the findings did not provide all the answers you hoped for. If this was the case, it is worth (a) briefly describing what aspects of your research questions were not answered and (b) suggesting a research strategy that could be used to explore such aspects in future.
Examining a conceptual framework (or testing a theoretical model)
for the first time
You may want to recommend that future research examines the conceptual framework (or tests the theoretical model) that you developed. This is based on the assumption that the primary goal of your dissertation was to set out a conceptual framework (or build a theoretical model). It is also based on the assumption that whilst such a conceptual framework (or theoretical model) was presented, your dissertation did not attempt to examine (or test) it in the field. The focus of your dissertations was most likely a review of the literature rather than something that involved you conducting primary research.
Whilst it is quite rare for dissertations at the undergraduate and master's level to be primarily theoretical in nature like this, it is not unknown. If this was the case, you should think about how the conceptual framework (or theoretical model) that you have presented could be best examined (or tested) in the field. In understanding the how, you should think about two factors in particular:
What is the context, location and/or culture that would best lend itself to my conceptual framework (or theoretical model) if it were to be examined (or tested) in the field?
What research strategy is most appropriate to examine my conceptual framework (or test my theoretical model)?
If the future research suggestion that you want to make is based on examining your conceptual framework (or testing your theoretical model) in the field, you need to suggest the best scenario for doing so.
Examining a conceptual framework (or testing a theoretical model)
in a new context, location and/or culture
More often than not, you will not only have set out a conceptual framework (or theoretical model), as described in the previous section, but you will also have examined (or tested) it in the field. When you do this, focus is typically placed on a specific context, location and/or culture.
If this is the case, the obvious future research suggestion that you could propose would be to examine your conceptual framework (or test the theoretical model) in a new context, location and/or culture. For example, perhaps you focused on consumers (rather than businesses), or Canada (rather than the United Kingdom), or a more individualistic culture like the United States (rather than a more collectivist culture like China).
When you propose a new context, location and/or culture as your future research suggestion, make sure you justify the choice that you make. For example, there may be little value in future studies looking at different cultures if culture is not an important component underlying your conceptual framework (or theoretical model). If you are not sure whether a new context, location or culture is more appropriate, or what new context, location or culture you should select, a review the literature will often help clarify where you focus should be.
Expanding a conceptual framework (or theoretical model)
Assuming that you have set out a conceptual framework (or theoretical model) and examined (or tested) it in the field, another series of future research suggestions comes out of expanding that conceptual framework (or theoretical model).
We talk about a series of future research suggestions because there are so many ways that you can expand on your conceptual framework (or theoretical model). For example, you can do this by:
Examining constructs (or variables) that were included in your conceptual framework (or theoretical model) but were not focused.
Looking at a particular relationship aspect of your conceptual framework (or theoretical model) further.
Adding new constructs (or variables) to the conceptual framework (or theoretical model) you set out (if justified by the literature).
It would be possible to include one or a number of these as future research suggestions. Again, make sure that any suggestions you make have are justified, either by your findings or the literature.
Re-evaluating a conceptual framework (or theoretical model)
With the dissertation process at the undergraduate and master's level lasting between 3 and 9 months, a lot a can happen in between. For example, a specific event (e.g., 9/11, the economic crisis) or some new theory or evidence that undermines (or questions) the literature (theory) and assumptions underpinning your conceptual framework (or theoretical model). Clearly, there is little you can do about this. However, if this happens, reflecting on it and re-evaluating your conceptual framework (or theoretical model), as well as your findings, is an obvious source of future research suggestions.
Contact Us Copyright © 2012 Lund Research Ltd
