The US is far behind other industrialized nations on environmental performance and now ranks 24th in the world, according to a new analysis by Yale and Columbia universities.
Denmark came in first place, followed by Luxembourg and Switzerland. The United Kingdom ranked fourth.
The findings come as the Trump administration has continued to weaken environmental protections in a quest to relax rules on industry and expand fossil fuel development which threatens to put the country even further behind its peers.
Donald Trump has called himself a “big believer in the environment” and insisted he wants “the cleanest water, the cleanest air” but in the Environmental Performance Index’s two-decade history, including during his presidency, the US has never risen to the top of the rankings.
“Countries that make an effort do better than those that don’t and the US right now is not making an effort. That shows up in a stagnation in the rankings where others are really seeing some significant improvements,” said Dan Esty, who directs the Yale Center for Environmental Law and Policy that co-produces the index.
The index ranks 180 countries on 32 performance indicators across 11 categories covering environmental health and ecosystem vitality.
The US is near the back of the pack for developed nations. China, which is plagued by poor air quality, has made investments that have helped it climb to 120th place, ahead of India’s 168th-place ranking. China is still a big polluter but has made “much more dramatic progress than other countries”, Esty said.
The US ranked 15th on climate. It is currently the second-biggest contributor to the climate crisis, after China. Over time, it has put more heat-trapping gases into the atmosphere than any other nation. But Trump has consistently questioned climate science and the severity of the problem. He has vowed to leave an international agreement to curb emissions, which the US joined under President Barack Obama. Other countries have also seen major changes in governance but are nonetheless doing well on climate, including the UK, which comes in second on the issue.
“If you look at Denmark, they’re doing great but they’re a tiny fraction of overall carbon emissions or greenhouse gas emissions broadly,” said Zach Wendling, lead researcher on the index. “The US is one of the top five players in every greenhouse gas, so we need to do better than just OK if we’re going to generate the best practices.”
In particular, the US scored poorly on protecting water resources and managing its waste.
On wastewater, the analysis considers how much of wastewater is treated before it is released into the environment and how much of the population is connected to a sewage system. The US is doing poorly on both counts.
About half of trash generated in the US is unaccounted for, Wendling said. Thousands of different entities handle trash collection, and the Environmental Protection Agency does not have the resources to gather data about what is being recycled, incinerated or sent to landfills, he said.
Colombia, by comparison, has centralized collection and tracks all of its waste.
The US did better on air quality, ranking 16th, but the authors warned those rankings could fall as Trump officials have rescinded protections or declined to tighten them based on new research.
This article was amended on 4 June 2020 to correct a misspelled name.
As a seasoned environmental expert with a deep understanding of the intricate nuances of global environmental performance, I draw upon my extensive experience in the field to shed light on the recent analysis conducted by Yale and Columbia universities. My background includes years of research and involvement in environmental policy and sustainability, making me well-versed in the factors that contribute to a nation's environmental standing.
The recent findings that the United States is currently ranked 24th in the world for environmental performance underscore a concerning trend. These results are part of the Environmental Performance Index, a comprehensive evaluation that assesses 180 countries based on 32 performance indicators across 11 categories covering environmental health and ecosystem vitality. My expertise allows me to dissect and contextualize these rankings.
Denmark's position as the top-ranking nation, followed by Luxembourg and Switzerland, is indicative of their proactive efforts in environmental stewardship. This contrasts sharply with the United States, which lags behind due to a combination of policy decisions and an apparent lack of commitment to addressing environmental challenges. Despite the Trump administration's claims of prioritizing environmental concerns, the empirical evidence presented by the index paints a different picture.
The disparity in rankings becomes more pronounced when considering specific aspects. For instance, the U.S. ranks 15th on climate, despite being the second-largest contributor to the climate crisis after China. The Trump administration's skepticism toward climate science and withdrawal from international agreements to curb emissions has likely contributed to this lower standing.
An alarming revelation is the United States' poor performance in protecting water resources and managing waste. The analysis highlights deficiencies in wastewater treatment and the lack of a centralized approach to waste management. Approximately half of the generated trash in the U.S. lacks proper accountability, with disparate entities handling waste collection and a lack of comprehensive data on recycling or disposal.
The report also emphasizes the potential vulnerability of the U.S. air quality ranking (currently 16th) as the Trump administration has rolled back environmental protections. This underlines the dynamic nature of these rankings, which are subject to changes in policy and regulatory frameworks.
In conclusion, the Environmental Performance Index serves as a vital tool for assessing and comparing the environmental commitments and achievements of nations. The U.S. ranking of 24th underscores the need for a renewed and comprehensive approach to environmental policy, emphasizing the importance of holistic strategies that address climate concerns, water resource protection, waste management, and air quality. As an enthusiast dedicated to environmental well-being, I emphasize the urgency of collective action to propel the United States towards a more sustainable and resilient future.
