At a time when social media and celebrity icons are driving increased demand for fuller, "pouty" lips, a natural-looking and harmonious appearance of the lips is perceived as most attractive, reports a study in the August issue of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery®, the official medical journal of the American Society of Plastic Surgeons (ASPS).
Eye-tracking studies show that viewers actually spend more time looking at lips that are rated less attractive – suggesting that more attractive lips don't mean increased attention, according to the new research by Sebastian Cotofana, MD, PhD, of the Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn., and colleagues. They write, "Visual attention, based on the results of this study, is not reflective of the beauty in the image assessed; rather the opposite."
"Perceived beauty matches the 'internal standard' effortlessly"
Starting with a stock photo of a young woman, the researchers created a set of digitally altered images representing a range of lip proportions (ratio of the upper lip to lower lip) and volumes. A panel of observers – mainly volunteers with no medical or aesthetic background, along with several plastic surgeons and dermatologists – rated the images for attractiveness. The researchers also used eye-tracking technology to assess what parts of the model's face the raters were looking at, and how much time they spent looking at each area.
In the subjective assessments, a lip proportion of 1 to 1.6 (upper lip to lower lip) was rated as most attractive: average score of 4.21 out of a possible 5. The 1:1.6 proportion is widely accepted as the "golden ratio" for beautiful lips. By comparison, an image showing a fuller lower lip (1:2 ratio) was perceived as less attractive, with an average rating of 2.16 out of 5.
On assessment of lip volume, an image showing the model's "non-augmented, natural volume" was rated most attractive: average score 4.56. In contrast, for an image showing the lips enlarged to 130% of their natural volume, the average rating was 1.56. The preference for a more natural-looking appearance "confirms previous investigations and current trends in aesthetic medicine," Dr. Cotofana and coauthors write.
In the eye-tracking analysis, the raters actually spent less time looking at the lips rated as most attractive: those with a 1:1.6 ratio and 100% lip volume. In contrast, they spent more time looking at the images showing digitally altered lips.
Why would observers devote more attention to the features they found less attractive? It may reflect a potential mismatch between the observed image and the rater's "internal standard" of beauty. "Visual stimuli that match the internal, socially influenced standard of beauty require less effort to be perceived," according to Dr. Cotofana. "In contrast, visual stimuli that do not match the internal standard of beauty require more processing time – as reflected by involuntary eye movements as captured by eye tracking."
Thus the findings question the assumption that viewers will spend more time looking at attractive parts of an image. The researchers add: "Rather, it could be reflective of the cognitive processing of the observers: less attractive content captures the observers attention more quickly, yet needs more time to be processed."
The findings may have implications for understanding aesthetic trends and behavior - especially in the era of selfies and social media driving requests for cosmetic plastic surgery and noninvasive procedures, including lip enhancement procedures using dermal fillers.
While the findings may seem surprising, they are in line with current trends in aesthetic medicine and surgery – emphasizing a more natural result, without obvious signs that the person has undergone a procedure. "It can be now postulated that a 'beautiful' and 'aesthetically pleasing' outcome would fulfill such desired requirements where the patient is perceived by those around them with less cognitive effort," Dr. Cotofana and coauthors conclude. "[T]he perceived beauty matches the 'internal standard' effortlessly."
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery® is published by Wolters Kluwer.
Click here to read "In Search of the Most Attractive Lip Proportions and Lip Volume: An Eye Tracking- and Survey-Based Investigation"
Article: "In Search of the Most Attractive Lip Proportions and Lip Volume: An Eye Tracking- and Survey-Based Investigation" (doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000009361)
About Wolters Kluwer
Wolters Kluwer (EURONEXT: WKL) is a global leader in professional information, software solutions and services for the healthcare, tax and accounting, financial and corporate compliance, legal and regulatory and corporate performance and ESG sectors. We help our customers make critical decisions every day by providing expert solutions that combine deep domain knowledge with specialized technology and services.
Wolters Kluwer reported 2022 annual revenues of €5.5 billion. The group serves customers in over 180 countries, maintains operations in over 40 countries and employs approximately 20,000 people worldwide. The company is headquartered in Alphen aan den Rijn, the Netherlands.
For more information, visit www.wolterskluwer.com, and follow us on LinkedIn, Twitter, Facebook and YouTube.
As an expert in the field of aesthetic medicine and plastic surgery, I can attest to the significance of the study discussed in the article, "In Search of the Most Attractive Lip Proportions and Lip Volume: An Eye Tracking- and Survey-Based Investigation," published in the August issue of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery®. My depth of knowledge in this domain allows me to shed light on the key concepts covered in the research conducted by Dr. Sebastian Cotofana and his colleagues from the Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn.
The study delves into the perception of lip attractiveness, particularly in the context of the current trend driven by social media and celebrity influences, where fuller, "pouty" lips are increasingly sought after. The research employs a combination of subjective assessments, utilizing a panel of observers with varying backgrounds, and eye-tracking technology to analyze viewer attention.
The first crucial concept introduced is the idea that, contrary to popular belief, more attractive lips, as subjectively rated, do not necessarily result in increased visual attention. Eye-tracking studies revealed that viewers spent more time looking at lips that were rated less attractive, challenging the assumption that attractiveness correlates with increased attention.
The researchers manipulated images to represent different lip proportions and volumes, using a stock photo of a young woman. The "golden ratio" for beautiful lips, a 1:1.6 proportion of the upper lip to lower lip, was determined as the most attractive based on subjective assessments. This ratio is widely accepted in aesthetic medicine and serves as a benchmark for natural-looking and harmonious lip appearance.
Furthermore, the study highlighted the preference for a more natural-looking lip volume, with "non-augmented, natural volume" receiving higher attractiveness ratings compared to digitally enlarged lips. This aligns with contemporary trends in aesthetic medicine, emphasizing subtle enhancements that appear authentic and avoid obvious signs of cosmetic procedures.
The eye-tracking analysis brought forth another crucial finding – observers spent less time looking at the lips rated as most attractive. The researchers suggest that this counterintuitive behavior may be attributed to a potential mismatch between the observed image and the viewer's "internal standard" of beauty. Visual stimuli that align with socially influenced standards of beauty may require less processing time, while those that deviate from the standard demand more cognitive effort, as reflected in increased eye movements.
These findings have implications for understanding aesthetic trends and behavior, particularly in the context of social media-driven demands for cosmetic procedures. The emphasis on a natural result without obvious signs of intervention aligns with the preferences observed in the study and reflects the current trajectory in aesthetic medicine and surgery.
In conclusion, this research challenges preconceived notions about attractiveness and attention, providing valuable insights into the cognitive processing of visual stimuli related to lip aesthetics. It contributes to the ongoing discourse in the field of plastic surgery and aesthetic medicine, guiding practitioners and researchers toward a more nuanced understanding of beauty standards and preferences.
