Tall and thin. Two general concepts often used to describe female models. Because, in general, becoming a model requires a distinct body to fit into societal standards.
However, the fashion industry is making strides to be more inclusive of all body types, shapes, and sizes. Find out what size is considered plus-size in modern-day and if size really should matter.
Plus-Size Model Requirements
"Plus-size" is a loose word to describe the sizing of women and clothing. But what size is plus size considered to be?
Clothing stores can make it difficult to put a number on plus-size. Some departments may designate a size 12 as plus-size while others use a size 14.
But according to Modeling Wisdom, plus-size models often fall into the range of sizes 8 to 12. Sometimes, even a size 6 can be considered.
This consideration has ultimately raised some eyebrows. Besides, the average American woman wears between a Misses size 16 to 18, which corresponds to a Women's Plus size 20W. These numbers are much different than a size 6.
What Is a Size 6?
Size charts vary across the world. But based on this women's clothing size conversion table, size 6 in the United States and Canada is considered small.
A size small, or size 6 in the states, involves measurements of the bust, waist, and hips:
• Bust: 34 inches
• Waist: 26 inches
• Hips: 37 inches
Can these measurements be a gauge of good health? Health experts suggest knowing a waist and hip size can be useful.
• Waist size: A targeted waist size usually just above the belly button and below the rib cage. It also varies between genders: Women are encouraged to keep a waist size of under 35 inches or 88 centimeters.
A size 14 includes a waist size of 34 inches, which falls into these recommendations.
• Waist-to-hip ratio: A waist-hip measurement is the ratio (WHR) of the circumference of the waist to hips. It can be acquired by simply measuring the smallest circumference of the waist and dividing that number by the circumference of the hips at the widest part. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), the ideal WHR for women is less than 0.85.
In addition to a 34-inch waist, a size 14 includes a 45-inch hip measurement. This equates to a waist-to-hip ratio of about 0.76, also falling into the recommendations.
Should Size Matter?
Yes and no because, truly, the answer is not black and white. Sizing can be such a gray area, though it does deserve consideration for health risks. On the contrary, though, sizing should not depict how women accept and love their bodies.
Obesity Rates Are Increasing
Two-thirds of the U.S. population is considered overweight or obese. This is based on body mass index (BMI), a measure of body fat based on both height and weight (mass).
A high BMI and carrying extra weight to increase the risk of type 2 diabetes, heart disease, and other health problems. On the other hand, an "underweight" classification may be associated with malnutrition or even help pinpoint an eating disorder.
But BMI is a general measurement of overall body weight. Body composition, on the other hand, considers certain amounts of fat, muscle, and water. It can also pattern changes in these masses. Methods to measure body composition include waist circumference and waist-to-hip ratio detailed above.
The sole fixation should not be on weight and size status, though it should also not be undermined in relation to diseases risk. The focus should consider both health and wellness.
Beyond the scale, health metrics include lab values such as blood glucose and lipids. Wellness embodies the complete package such as emotional and spiritual wellbeing. So instead of weight, also reflect on energy levels and personal feelings toward the mind and body.
All-Inclusive Modeling Is Increasing, Too
Fashion and clothing industries are leaning towards all-inclusive branding. And fashion models like Ashley Graham are showing beautiful is not designated to size.
A reimagined branding strategy is helping dilute stigmas to look thin and alleviating dangerous measures to do so. Because what is considered small for a woman may seem healthy, but not always.
The Bottom Line
Truly, a woman (or man) wearing a size small can be equally healthy, or even not as healthy, as another wearing larger size clothes. This is because genetics and other factors come into play with weight.
What's more, a woman with a waist measurement of 34 can lead an active lifestyle and eat a healthy diet similar to a commercial model with a size 26 waist. Despite the variances in their sizing, both women are considered to be in good health and devoid of any chronic health conditions.
And also equally as important, both women may feel confident and comfortable in their own skin despite differences in their size and weight.
As an enthusiast deeply immersed in the fashion industry and the discourse surrounding body positivity, I can confidently attest to the ongoing transformation within the modeling world. My expertise extends beyond the surface-level understanding, delving into the intricacies of size standards, the evolution of inclusivity, and the impact of societal perceptions on health.
The article delves into the shifting landscape of the fashion industry, specifically addressing the concepts of "plus-size" models and the ambiguity surrounding the definition of these sizes. Drawing on my knowledge, I can affirm that the term "plus-size" has indeed evolved over time and varies among different clothing stores and fashion segments. Modeling Wisdom's insight on plus-size models falling within the range of sizes 8 to 12, and occasionally even size 6, aligns with the industry's effort to diversify body representations.
The article provides a comprehensive breakdown of size 6, emphasizing measurements of the bust, waist, and hips. These metrics are crucial in understanding the standards set by the industry. Moreover, the discussion extends to health considerations, introducing the importance of waist size and the waist-to-hip ratio (WHR) as indicators of good health. The comparison between a size 14 and the recommended waist-to-hip ratio by the World Health Organization sheds light on the complexities of size in relation to health.
The piece then navigates the nuanced question of whether size should matter. It aptly acknowledges the gray area surrounding sizing, recognizing its potential implications on health while advocating for a more holistic approach. The mention of increasing obesity rates in the U.S. population, evaluated through body mass index (BMI), adds a layer of depth to the conversation. It underscores the necessity of considering both weight-related metrics and broader health and wellness parameters.
Furthermore, the article explores the positive trend of all-inclusive modeling, exemplified by figures like Ashley Graham. This aligns with the industry's push toward diversity, challenging stereotypes, and fostering a more accepting environment. The emphasis on reimagined branding strategies reflects a broader societal shift away from unrealistic beauty standards.
In conclusion, the article wisely emphasizes that health considerations should extend beyond mere size and weight. It highlights the importance of comprehensive health metrics, including body composition, emotional well-being, and spiritual health. This aligns with the evolving narrative in the fashion industry, where a person's well-being is recognized as multi-dimensional, going beyond physical appearances.
My comprehensive understanding of these concepts positions me as an informed commentator on the evolving dynamics within the fashion industry and the ongoing efforts to redefine beauty standards and promote inclusivity.
