This COPE discussion document introduces issues and guidance around the ownership of peer reviews. Questions discussedinclude: who has ownership of peer review comments;who gets to determine whether a review can be made public, and if so, which parties would be required to consent to its publication. The document also covers whether the sharing of reviewer comments breaches the confidentiality or anonymity of peer review,protocols for publishing the names of reviewers, and guidance for potential transfers of reviews of manuscripts that are rejected then submitted elsewhere.
Key points
- The movement towards greater transparency, accountability and recognition in peer review has led to questions around the ownership of review content.
- Under copyright law, most reviews would be considered to meet the requirements for an “original work of authorship”, and therefore, the reviewer holds copyright, unless they expressly transfer copyright by written agreement to the publisher.
- Concepts of “openness” in peer review should not be confused with a “lack of confidentiality”.
- Any confidentiality assured during the review process should be maintained, upheld and protected even after publication, unless expressly permitted by relevant parties.
- Authors must be consulted about publication of all pre-accepted works, as they may not wish to see details of earlier versions of their paper revealed via peer review reports.
Podcast
Pete Binfield, Publisher and co-Founder of PeerJ, and Elizabeth Moylan, Senior Editor BioMed Central, discuss "Who owns peer reviews?" in this 2017 podcast.
Related resources
- Editing peer reviewsguidelines
- Editing of reviewer commentsForum discussion,March 2020
- Editing of reviewer commentssurvey, June 2020
Your feedback
COPE welcomes feedback to this ongoing debate from publishers, journal editors, reviewers, researchers, institutions, librarians, funders, and other stakeholders.
- Login to your account or register
to post comments
Core practices:
About this resource
Written byCOPE Council
Version 1September 2017
How to cite thisCOPE Council. COPE Discussion Document: Who 'owns' peer reviews?September 2017.https://doi.org/10.24318/rouP8ld4
Our COPE materials are available to use under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs license
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Attribution — You must attribute the work in the manner specified by the author or licensor (but not in any way that suggests that they
endorse you or your use of the work).
Non-commercial — You may not use this work for commercial purposes. No Derivative Works — You may not alter, transform, or build upon this work. We ask that you give full accreditation to COPE with a link to our website:publicationethics.org
Full page history
-
3 February 2022
New download component
-
2 February 2022
Added link to Version 1: https://publicationethics.org/files/u7140/Who_Owns_Peer_Reviews_Discussion_Document_Web.pdf
