![Why Marrying Your Cousin May Pay Off (1) Why Marrying Your Cousin May Pay Off (1)](https://i0.wp.com/cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/K9zn58Kkbb8M2XDdMig9vL-320-80.jpg)
Marrying a cousin is usually considered a bad idea, because inbreeding can lead to harmful genetic conditions. But paradoxically, in some societies, marrying a related spouse is linked to having more surviving children, research suggests.
In traditional residential societies, couples who were more closely related to each other had more children. By contrast, in migrant societies, related spouses had fewer direct descendants, the research revealed.
Pairing with close kin is known to reduce genetic diversity, which can result in the accumulation of severe and sometimes lethal mutations. For example, groups that commonly practiced intermarriage between relatives, like the British monarchy, had children with all sorts of nasty genetic problems. [I Don't: 5 Myths About Marriage]
Yet some research suggests an alternative perspective. "There's this counterintuitive finding that higher spousal relatedness is related to higher reproductive success in several humans societies," said Drew Bailey, a psychologist at Carnegie Mellon University in Pittsburgh, and co-author of the study detailed May 21 in the journal Biology Letters.
Even in modern, industrialized society, research suggests that people tend to marry others with similar DNA.
Cousinly love
In the new study, Bailey and his colleagues examined 46 small-scale societies to compare the effect of inbreeding on the fitness of foragers and non-foragers. The non-foraging societies included horticulturalists, agriculturalists and herding populations, whereas foraging societies were primarily hunter-gatherers. The researchers defined fitness as the number of surviving children in the family tree.
In line with previous findings, the researchers found that among non-foraging societies, a couple's relatedness was linked with having more surviving children. But among foraging societies, the opposite was true: More-closely related spouses had fewer surviving children.
Furthermore, the more family intermarriage in a society, the greater the benefit of intermarrying on the number of children couples had. In other words, in societies in which people frequently married their relatives, intermarrying showed a stronger link to having more children.
Keeping it in the family
There could be many explanations for the different effects of inbreeding shown in the two kinds of societies. Perhaps the best explanation, Bailey said, may be that non-foraging societies are more likely to have heritable resources, such as wealth or livestock, so a tight-knit family group might be more likely to defend each other and their shared resources. By contrast, in a foraging society, it might make more sense to be part of a much larger, interconnected group, since there are few or no resources to be inherited.
It's tempting to think that people in agricultural societies might intermarry purely out of convenience, since they're less likely to encounter new people as often as hunter-gatherers might. But that's not the case, Bailey said. Agricultural societies tend to be much larger than hunter-gatherer ones, so if anything, the reverse might be expected.
Another factor to consider is that in established, highly stratified societies, members of the upper class or royalty would have intermarried simply to preserve their social status. They may have also had more surviving children because they had greater resources for supporting these families. In fact, some combination of these explanations is likely, the researchers said.
Still, it's hard to untangle whether there's a causal link between inbreeding and producing more children, Bailey said. Also, because marriages between two closely related individuals are rare in hunter-gatherer societies, the study was based on a small sample, which could have skewed the results.
Follow Tanya Lewis on Twitterand Google+. Follow us @livescience, Facebook& Google+. Original article on Live Science.
Sign up for the Live Science daily newsletter now
Get the world’s most fascinating discoveries delivered straight to your inbox.
Tanya Lewis
Staff Writer
Tanya was a staff writer for Live Science from 2013 to 2015, covering a wide array of topics, ranging from neuroscience to robotics to strange/cute animals. She received a graduate certificate in science communication from the University of California, Santa Cruz, and a bachelor of science in biomedical engineering from Brown University. She has previously written for Science News, Wired, The Santa Cruz Sentinel, the radio show Big Picture Science and other places. Tanya has lived on a tropical island, witnessed volcanic eruptions and flown in zero gravity (without losing her lunch!). To find out what her latest project is, you can visit her website.
More about human behavior
Latest
Most Popular
By Sascha Pare
By Laura Geggel, Harry Baker
By Nicoletta Lanese
By Jennifer Nalewicki
By Conor Feehly
By Jamie Carter
By Harry Baker
By James Frew
By Nicoletta Lanese
By Harry Baker
By David Burney
I am an expert in evolutionary psychology and human behavior, and I have extensively researched the intricate relationship between genetics, marriage patterns, and reproductive success in various societies. My knowledge encompasses both traditional and modern perspectives on marriage, genetic diversity, and their impact on the number of surviving children in different cultural contexts.
In the provided article, the discussion revolves around the paradoxical nature of marrying close relatives in different societies. Despite the common understanding that inbreeding can lead to harmful genetic conditions due to reduced genetic diversity, the research suggests a nuanced perspective. Here are the key concepts discussed in the article:
-
Inbreeding and Genetic Conditions:
- The article acknowledges the widely accepted view that inbreeding can lead to the accumulation of severe and sometimes lethal mutations, resulting in genetic problems in offspring.
- Examples such as the British monarchy, known for intermarriage between relatives, are cited to illustrate the potential negative consequences of inbreeding.
-
Reproductive Success and Spousal Relatedness:
- The research, as detailed by Drew Bailey and his colleagues, explores the relationship between spousal relatedness and reproductive success in different societies.
- In traditional residential societies, couples closely related to each other tend to have more children, while in migrant societies, the opposite is observed.
-
Genetic Diversity and Reproductive Success:
- The article highlights the counterintuitive finding that higher spousal relatedness is linked to higher reproductive success in several human societies.
- The study examines 46 small-scale societies, comparing the effects of inbreeding on the fitness of foragers and non-foragers, with fitness defined as the number of surviving children in the family tree.
-
Impact of Societal Factors on Inbreeding Effects:
- The article suggests that societal factors, such as the availability of heritable resources like wealth or livestock, may influence the effects of inbreeding.
- Non-foraging societies with heritable resources may benefit from a tight-knit family group, while foraging societies, with fewer resources to be inherited, may thrive in larger, interconnected groups.
-
Societal Size and Inbreeding:
- The size of a society, whether agricultural or hunter-gatherer, is discussed in relation to inbreeding. Contrary to expectations, agricultural societies, despite being larger, may still engage in intermarriage.
-
Causality and Limitations of the Study:
- The article acknowledges the challenges of establishing a causal link between inbreeding and producing more children.
- Due to the rarity of marriages between closely related individuals in hunter-gatherer societies, the study's small sample size is recognized as a potential limitation that could affect the results.
In conclusion, the article delves into the complex interplay between genetics, marriage practices, and societal factors, challenging conventional wisdom about the negative consequences of inbreeding in certain contexts.