Globalization Changes the Face of Textile, Clothing and Footwear Industries (2024)

ILO/96/33

GENEVA (ILO News) - The geographical distribution of production in the textile, clothing and footwear (TCF) industries has changed dramatically in the past 25 years resulting in sizeable employment losses in Europe and North America and important gains in Asia and other parts of the developing world. This trend, says the International Labour Office in a new report (Endnote 1) has been accompanied by a parallel shift of production from the formal to the informal sector in many countries with generally negative consequences on wage levels and conditions of work.

The available evidence, however, also suggests that globalization has led to a net gain in the level of worldwide employment and that the informal sector promotes "a growing volume of employment in developing countries, especially in clothing and footwear". And, as the report also points out, employment in formal sector establishments has changed very little since 1980, while real earnings have in fact risen in several industrialized countries.

The total number of TCF workers in the formal sector is estimated at 23.6 million worldwide. "No one knows just how many work in the informal sector but the figure may be five to ten times as high", says Mr. Kari Tapiola, Deputy Director-General of the ILO.

Written by staff from the ILO Sectoral activities department, the report will serve as a basis for discussions by participants in a "Tripartite Meeting on the Globalization in the Footwear, Textiles and Clothing Industries" held in Geneva from 28 October to 1 November. Delegates to the meeting represent the governments, employers' organizations and trade unions from 34 leading TCF producing, exporting and importing countries.

The meeting will discuss labour and employment issues relevant to the TCF industries and is expected to provide guidance for national and international action to promote employment, basic workers' rights and sound working conditions throughout the sector.

Much of production capacity and jobs have shifted to the developing world. In the twenty years from 1970 to 1990, the number of TCF workers increased by 597 percent in Malaysia; 416 percent in Bangladesh; 385 percent in Sri Lanka; 334 percent in Indonesia; 271percent in the Philippines; and 137 percent in Korea.

China now employs 5.3 million workers, the most in the world, an increase of some 2million workers since 1980.

During the same 20-year period, employment in the developed world declined sharply. The number of TCF workers has decreased by 58 percent in Germany; United Kingdom - 55percent;

France - 49 percent; and the United States - 31 percent. The US still employs 1.6million workers, down from 2.5 million in 1980.

The decline has been even more severe in Northern Europe. In the 10 years between 1980 and 1990, Finland lost 73 percent of its TCF jobs. Sweden and Norway lost 65 percent.

While the evidence presented in the report "contradicts - for the formal sector - the hypothesis that globalization leads to real earnings compression in the higher-income countries", it also points to a "widening earnings gap between TCF workers in higher- and lower-income countries."

For example, in 1992 the average hourly labour costs (wages and social charges) in the textile, apparel and leather industries were: Germany - $18.40; Italy - $15.70; France - $13.40; Japan - $10.30; Canada - $10.50; US - $10; Spain - $9.70.

This compares with: Mexico - $1.70; Hong Kong - $3.70; Korea - $3.80; Taiwan, China - $4.20.

In response to fast-changing demand patterns, the TCF industries have witnessed a gradual "shift of full-time in-plant jobs to part-time and temporary jobs and, especially in clothing and footwear, increasing recourse to home work and small shops" notes the ILO report. Wages of homeworkers are almost universally based on the piece rate system and tend to be substantially lower than for equivalent factory workers. The first, and to date only, international Convention (No. 177)promoting the rights of homeworkers was adopted by the ILO in June 1996.

"Child labour", says the report, "is still very much a reality in the TCF sectors" and has recently increased as a result of the growth of the informal sector and homework. Of late however, rising pressure from consumer groups, but also from governments, trade unions, employers' organizations and NGOs has begun to reverse this trend. Among other significant measures: the adoption of "Codes of ethics" by several large multinational enterprises such as Levi's, The Gap, Reebok and others.

In the clothing industry, the number of clandestine workshops has grown exponentially in recent years. Few pay any respect to labour legislation and many hire illegal migrants. Many are involved in counterfeiting products from famous trade marks, an activity estimated to account for more the 5 percent of world trade in clothing.

The impact of the globalization of TCF differs according to country and the individual industry.

Clothing

At present, more than 60 percent of world clothing exports are manufactured in developing countries. Asia is the major world supplier today, producing more than 32 percent of the world's clothing exports.

This emergence as the major world supplier has occurred in three successive waves of production.

During the first wave of production, the Republic of Korea, Singapore, the territory of Hong Kong and Taiwan achieved excellent results within their own borders, but then began to cut down production and invest heavily in other least-cost countries. As a result, between 1985 and 1990, the production of the Philippines, Indonesia, Thailand and Malaysia increased greatly and led the world market in exports.

These countries have in turn begun to invest or redistribute part of their production to a third wave of countries such as Bangladesh, Pakistan, Sri Lanka and more recently Laos, Nepal and Viet Nam.

China however, has become the leading world producer and supplier of clothing - currently generating almost 13 percent of the world supply - without the benefit of outsourcing from other countries. Instead, the country has thrived under a government policy geared toward developing a clothing and textiles industry open to the outside world.

On the American continent, NAFTA has made Mexico a privileged supplier of clothing to Canada and the United States - the leading purchaser of clothing, importing 24percent of the world's supply.

In addition, foreign investors who had anticipated the signing of the free trade agreement, have built up the clothing industry in Mexico which, with its 8,000 clothing enterprises, is in a strong position against its Latin American competitors.

In Central and Eastern Europe, Bulgaria, Hungary, Poland, Romania and the Czech Republic are gradually becoming important suppliers to the European market.

Each country has tended to specialize in a specific range of products and their volume of exports to the OECD countries has been steadily growing since the middle of the 1980s ($2.4 million in 1987; $5.2 million in 1991).

Since 1991, the place left empty by the former Yugoslavia has prompted foreign investors and entrepreneurs to shift their activities to other countries. Croatia, the Russian Federation, Slovenia and Ukraine have thus become host countries for the relocated activities of European clothing industrialists.

In several instances, ultra-modern factories capable of holding their own against their most successful Western counterparts have been constructed to ensure that they can produce articles complying with European quality standards.

Morocco, Mauritius, Tunisia and more recently Madagascar, have become important clothing producers which export most of their production to industrialized countries. African countries as a whole, however, have been little affected by the globalization of the TCF industries.

Textiles

The biggest changes in the textile industry occurred in the 1960s when new production centres began rapidly springing up in Asia.

Many of these centres opened first to service the less capital-intensive clothing industry, then used the export earnings from these products to set up their own textiles production.

Other developing countries entered the market with investments from multinational enterprises.

As a result of new production centres, the share of textiles from developing countries increased dramatically throughout the 1970s. The production of certain fibres by these countries increased by nearly 300 percent, to account for more than 21 percent of the world's supply by 1980.

During the past two decades, textile production in Asia has forged further ahead at an average increase of 3.6 percent per year. By comparison, industrialized countries have only increased production an average of 0.2 percent per year over the same period.

Despite the tendency towards relocation, industrialized countries still lead in the worldwide production of textiles, due to their great strides in modernizing the production process.

In 1990, Germany was still the main world exporter of textiles, producing 12 percent of world exports in value. Italy was second, producing 8.6 percent of world exports. Four other industrialized countries - Belgium (5.7 percent), France (5.5 percent), Japan (5.3percent) and the United States (4.5percent) - were in the list of the 10 major world exporters.

The other major exporters were in Asia. The territory of Hong Kong ranked third with 7.4 percent of the value of world exports, followed by China in fourth place with 6.5 percent, Taiwan in sixth place with 5.7 percent, and the Republic of Korea in seventh place with 5.6 percent.

Footwear

The footwear and clothing industries are similar in structure and share many of the characteristics of production and trade. Most of the countries that have emerged as successful producers and exporters of garments have also become important in footwear.

Among the exceptions, Brazil and Mexico have become key players in footwear, but much less in clothing. A few other countries - such as Singapore - are major producers of garments but not footwear.

Almost all of the higher-cost countries have seen their footwear production fall. In the United States, the industry has declined - since the late 1970s - more than in any other industrialized nation, although footwear production in France, Germany and the United Kingdom has declined significantly in the ensuing years.

Production has also declined, albeit more slowly, in major Southern European producer countries - since 1985 in Italy, 1988 in Spain, and 1991 in Portugal.

As in the clothing and textile industries, footwear production has shifted largely to developing countries capable of producing large shares of the world's supply at far less cost.

In 1992, for example, 63.2 percent of the world's total pairs of shoes were produced in Asia and the Middle East, even though these regions accounted for only 43.5 percent of shoe consumption.

In contrast, North and Central America, which produced only 6.4 percent of the world's shoes, consumed 20.6 percent.

The countries of Western Europe produced 11.7 percent and consumed 18.2 percent of the global shoe production.

Percent changes in employment in the tclf industries (Endnote 2), 1980-1993


Country

%

Country

%

Finland

Sweden

Norway

Austria

Poland

Syria

France

Hungary

Netherlands

United Kingdom

New Zealand

Germany

Spain

Australia

Argentina

United States


-71.7
-65.4
-64.9
-51.5
-51.0
-50.0
-45.4
-43.1
-41.7
-41.5
-40.9
-40.2
-35.3
-34.7
-32.9
-30.1

Mauritius

Indonesia

Morocco

Jordan

Jamaica

Malaysia

Mexico

China

Islamic Rep. of Iran

Turkey

Philippines

Honduras

Chile

Kenya

Israel

Venezuela

344.6
177.4
166.5
160.8
101.7
101.2
85.5
57.3
34.0
33.7
31.8
30.5
27.2
16.1
13.4
7.9

Endnote 1:

Globalization of the footwear, textiles and clothing industries. Report for discussion at the Tripartite Meeting on the Globalization of the Footwear, Textiles and Clothing Industries: Effects on Employment and Working Conditions. ISBN 92-2-110182-7. International Labour Office, Geneva, 1996.

Endnote 2 :

Source: International Labour Office.

Includes Leather, in addition to the Textile, Clothing and Footwear industries discussed above.

Globalization Changes the Face of Textile, Clothing and Footwear Industries (2024)

FAQs

Globalization Changes the Face of Textile, Clothing and Footwear Industries? ›

Globalization made the industry more receptive to different styles, cultural influences, and production techniques–giving people worldwide access to a broader range of apparel.

How has globalization affected the clothing industry? ›

Globalization made the industry more receptive to different styles, cultural influences, and production techniques–giving people worldwide access to a broader range of apparel.

Why textile and clothing industries are shifting to the third world? ›

Garment and footwear manufacturing are labour-intensive industries that employ large numbers of mostly low-skilled workers. To cut costs, fashion companies are therefore increasingly outsourcing to developing countries where labour is cheap.

How did the textile industry change over time? ›

The industrial revolution was one of the main factors in transforming the textile industry. It created new machines, which allowed for many more things to be done in a shorter time with fewer workers, so cloth production increased rapidly.

How did changing textile industry technologies affect society? ›

The British textile industry drove the Industrial Revolution, triggering advancements in technology, stimulating the coal and iron industries, boosting raw material imports, and improving transportation, which made Britain the global leader of industrialization, trade, and scientific innovation.

How has globalization caused fast fashion? ›

In the context of post-cold war globalization, western companies carried out the massive outsourcing of labour and offshoring of garment factories into developing countries.

What was the result of the textile industry? ›

The British textile industry drove the Industrial revolution, triggering advancements in technology, stimulating the coal and iron industries, boosting raw material imports, and improving transportation, which made Britain the global leader of industrialization, trade, and scientific innovation.

What impact did the textile industry have on America and the people there? ›

The factories provided a wide variety of textile products to everyone, everywhere. They were also an important source of new jobs. People moved from farms and small towns to larger towns and cities to work in factories and the many support businesses that grew up around them.

What impact does the textile industry have on the global environment? ›

Textile production is estimated to be responsible for about 20% of global clean water pollution from dyeing and finishing products. Laundering synthetic clothes accounts for 35% of primary microplastics released into the environment.

What are the 3 main ways the textile industry can influence the environment? ›

The main environmental problems caused by the textile industry include water pollution, air pollution and solid waste pollution.

What are the changes that happened in the textile industry? ›

The textile industry underwent many changes and created several problems during and after this era. Some examples include: Automation: Inventions and equipment developed to increase the production and efficiency of textiles.

What advances brought about changes in the textile industry? ›

The British textile industry triggered tremendous scientific innovation, resulting in such key inventions as the flying shuttle, spinning jenny, water frame, and spinning mule. These greatly improved productivity and drove further technological advancements that turned textiles into a fully mechanized industry.

Who changed the textile industry? ›

Throughout the 1700s, inventors such as Richard Arkwright, Eli Whitney, James Hargreaves, John Kay and Edmund Cartwright, developed machines and techniques that helped improve production, especially in terms of the textile industry.

How has technology affected the textile industry in a negative way? ›

Now, machines that skilled laborers used to operate manually can be computerized and programmed to produce textile materials. This development has negatively affected the employment rate for this industry, since there are fewer people needed to man the machines.

How did technology change the textile industry? ›

Technological advances in weaving, dyeing, finishing and printing have made fabric manufacturing more efficient, environmentally friendly and lower-cost than ever before.

What was the impact of the textile industry during the Industrial Revolution? ›

The British textile industry triggered tremendous scientific innovation, resulting in such key inventions as the flying shuttle, spinning jenny, water frame, and spinning mule. These greatly improved productivity and drove further technological advancements that turned textiles into a fully mechanized industry.

What has been the impact of globalization on appearance? ›

People wanted trendier clothes at lower prices; thus, fast fashion was born (Bhardwaj and Fairhurst 167–168). The biggest outcome of the globalization of the fashion industry has been fast fashion, which is the process of moving designs quickly from the cat- walk to retailers.

What is the impact of fast fashion globally? ›

The Dark Side of Fast Fashion

It dries up water sources and pollutes rivers and streams, while 85% of all textiles go to dumps each year. Even washing clothes releases 500,000 tons of microfibres into the ocean each year, the equivalent of 50 billion plastic bottles.

What is an example of a globalization? ›

Thus, globalization can be defined as the stretching of economic, political, and social relationships in space and time. A manufacturer assembling a product for a distant market, a country submitting to international law, and a language adopting a foreign loanword are all examples of globalization.

What caused the decline of the textile industry? ›

Industry advocates point to cheap imports, overseas labor, big-box retailers and U.S. trade policy in the demise U.S. textiles.

Why did the textile industry decline? ›

The Manchester products overwhelmed Indian business sectors. The machine-made products were less expensive and weavers couldn't contend with them. Raw cotton trades from India to Britain shot up the costs of cotton. By 1850, trade from most winding-around districts got declined.

Why did the textile industry collapse? ›

This industry has seen ups and downs over the years due to a variety of factors and has struggled as a result of high manufacturing costs, frequent power outages, flawed strategies, and a lack of government support policies.

What are the negative effects of the textile industry? ›

  • With fast fashion, the quantity of clothes produced and thrown away has boomed. ...
  • Fast fashion is the constant provision of new styles at very low prices. ...
  • Overconsumption of natural resources. ...
  • Water pollution. ...
  • The majority of microplastics from textiles are released during the first few washes. ...
  • Greenhouse gas emissions.
Dec 29, 2020

What happened to the textile industry in the US? ›

Background on Textile Industry Exodus

From 1994 to 2005, the United States lost more than 900,000 textile and apparel jobs to offshoring. Since the 1960s, low wages and new industrial production capacity in countries such as China, India, and Brazil made textile production in the United States a losing proposition.

What is the economic impact of textile industry? ›

The textile and clothing industry is a major contributor to economies around the world and is estimated to be worth over $3 trillion and employs 300 million people, many of them women (Hiller, 2021; UN Alliance for Sustainable Fashion, 2021).

What are some of the global concerns to sustainability in the textiles industry? ›

Consequently, in addition to issues concerning carbon emissions, water consumption, and waste disposal, another major problem of the fashion industry is the overuse of employees working in outsourced production units in countries with unsafe work environments and lower labour costs (Shrivastava et al., 2021).

What is the global textile waste problem? ›

The world produces 92 million tons of textile waste every year. China (20M Tons) and the US (17M Tons) produce the most. Clothing and textiles currently make up at least 7% of the total amount of waste in global landfill space. Between 80 and 100 billion new clothing garments are produced globally every year.

What are the environmental impacts of global fashion? ›

Plastic fibres are polluting the oceans, the wastewater, toxic dyes, and the exploitation of underpaid workers. Fast fashion is big business, and while the environmental costs are rising, experts say there is another way: a circular economy for textiles.

What are two ethical problems associated with the textile industry? ›

What are the ethical issues? Every industry has its ethical issues, but some of the most overlooked ethical problems of the textile industry are low wages, child labor, animal cruelty, high usage of natural resources, environmental pollution, and increased consumption and wastage of products.

What are the positive effects of the textile industry? ›

Because of clothing and protective gear, farmers can use fertilizers, herbicides, or pesticides to increase crop yields. They can also use equipment filters and protective coverings for planting, harvesting, and protecting their crops. Without all of these technical textiles, food production would be less reliable.

How can we reduce the environmental impact of textile industry? ›

  1. Reduce the use of toxic processes. ...
  2. Investigate recycled textile creation options. ...
  3. Stop participating in the fast fashion trend. ...
  4. Improve wastewater-related practices. ...
  5. Develop fabrics that shed less. ...
  6. A commitment to change sparks impressive results.
Aug 19, 2020

What are the three important invention in the textile industry? ›

Inventions like Spinning Jenny, Water Frame, Mule and Powerloom aided the textile industry whereas the invention of the Steam Engine, Rail Coach, Steam Ship aided the transport sector.

How was the textile industry changed by the new inventions in the Industrial Revolution? ›

Technological innovations in the United States such as Eli Whitney's cotton gin were able to further benefit the production of textiles; the cotton gin separated seeds from the cotton more quickly than before so that the United States was able to produce fifty times more cotton.

When did the textile industry decline? ›

Between 1973 and 1996, nearly a million jobs were lost in the textile and apparel industries combined—a decline of nearly 40 percent.

Who revolutionized the American textile industry? ›

Samuel Slater is sometimes called the "Father of the American Industrial Revolution," because he was responsible for the first American-built textile milling machinery in Rhode Island. Now the mill he built is a museum dedicated to the history of textile manufacture.

Who brought the textile industry to America? ›

The First American Cotton Mill Began Operation. Samuel Slater built that first American mill in Pawtucket based on designs of English inventor Richard Arkwright. Though it was against British law to leave the country if you were a textile worker, Slater fled anyway in order to seek his fortune in America.

Which invention radically changed textile manufacturing? ›

With the invention of the cotton gin 1793 by Eli Whitney, America's cotton textile industry took off. The cotton gin is a device which separates the cotton seed from the cotton fiber, a task which previously had been slow and labor-intensive.

Why is technology important in the clothing industry? ›

Technology has had an impact on every aspect of fashion, from automation to customization and the manufacturing, design, distribution, and marketing of orders. Soon, it won't be unusual to see robots cutting and sewing fabric, AI systems forecasting fashion trends, or even clothing that can be tried on virtually.

What are the negative impacts of the world's clothes production? ›

Fashion production makes up 10% of humanity's carbon emissions, dries up water sources, and pollutes rivers and streams.

How was the global textile industry transformed during the Industrial Revolution? ›

During the Industrial Revolution (1760-1840), textile production was transformed from a cottage industry to a highly mechanised one where workers were present only to make sure the carding, spinning, and weaving machines never stopped.

What was one significant change in textile production? ›

What innovations improved the textile industry? Many innovations have improved the textile industry! Some of the most notable include the flying shuttle (1733), spinning jenny and the water frame (1769-1770), spinning mule (1779), power loom (1785), cotton gin (1794), Jacquard loom (1804), and synthetic dyes (1856).

Why did the Industrial Revolution began in the textile industry? ›

The Industrial Revolution began in England, which was by 1750, one of the wealthiest nations in the world and controlled an empire that covered one-quarter of the world's landmass. It started with England's textile industry, which was struggling to produce goods cheaper and faster for growing consumer markets.

How does globalization affect the retail industry? ›

Globalization has become increasingly prominent in the early 21st century as U.S.-based companies look to grow by expanding their marketplaces in other countries. For retailers that have saturated the domestic market, globalization gives them access to new customers and new capital useful in global marketing.

How are global fashion brands benefiting from globalization? ›

Globalization has propelled the fashion industry to new heights, transforming the way we produce, consume and perceive fashion. Supply chains have expanded across borders, enabling brands to manufacture products in countries with cost-effective labor and resources.

How does globalization affect brands? ›

Competition. Globalization leads to increased competition. This competition can be related to product and service cost and price, target market, technological adaptation, quick response, quick production by companies etc. When a company produces with less cost and sells cheaper, it is able to increase its market share.

How globalization affects local businesses and local products? ›

Access to The Global Market

Because of lower trade barriers, small businesses are able to reach previously inaccessible customers in other parts of the world. A small business can grow if it sells its products to people in other countries, especially if it offers something that those countries want.

How does globalization affect consumer culture? ›

Globalization and the impact it has on consumer behavior has become a hot topic over the past few years. The rise of international trade, economic growth, and communication has led to the blurring of cultural boundaries. This allows consumers to gain access to new information, goods, and services like never before.

What factors are impacting the retail industry? ›

These 5 variables are factors every business owner should pay attention to, since they all affect how—and what—consumers buy.
  • Competition. ...
  • Political Climate. ...
  • State of the Economy. ...
  • Trends. ...
  • Technology.
Feb 21, 2018

What are the benefits of brand globalization? ›

Here are eight common benefits of global branding:
  • It increases a brand's presence. ...
  • It can improve the effectiveness of a brand's products or services. ...
  • It can increase a brand's competitive advantage. ...
  • It has to potential to enhance a brand's value. ...
  • It increases opportunities in different parts of the world.
Sep 30, 2022

What are the benefits of globalization of products? ›

Globalization allows companies to find lower-cost ways to produce their products. It also increases global competition, which drives prices down and creates a larger variety of choices for consumers.

Which company benefits most from globalization? ›

Here are 5 examples of famous companies that have excelled at globalization.
  1. Coca-Cola. Possibly the most famous global brand in the world. ...
  2. SAP. Another highly successful example of a globalized company is SAP. ...
  3. Domino's. ...
  4. IBM. ...
  5. AccuWeather.
Jan 4, 2022

What are the pros and cons of brand globalisation? ›

The advantages of creating a global brand are economies of scale in production and packaging, which lower marketing costs while leveraging power and scope. The disadvantages, however, are that consumer needs differ across countries, as do legal and competitive environments.

What are the positive and negative effects of globalization? ›

Globalisation has been positive by improving the quality of life in many countries. On the other hand, there have been negative impacts of globalisation, such as increased global inequality, increased corruption, loss of jobs and environmental degradation, to name a few.

What are 3 impacts that fast fashion has on the environment? ›

Plastic fibres are polluting the oceans, the wastewater, toxic dyes, and the exploitation of underpaid workers. Fast fashion is big business, and while the environmental costs are rising, experts say there is another way: a circular economy for textiles.

What are the positive impacts of the fast fashion industry? ›

They can afford the latest articles and styles regularly because they are cheaply made. Fast fashion accelerates supply chains and drives costs down to meet constantly evolving consumers' demands. Fast fashion brands and retailers employ factories in faraway countries where labor costs are very low.

Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Cheryll Lueilwitz

Last Updated:

Views: 5842

Rating: 4.3 / 5 (74 voted)

Reviews: 89% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Cheryll Lueilwitz

Birthday: 1997-12-23

Address: 4653 O'Kon Hill, Lake Juanstad, AR 65469

Phone: +494124489301

Job: Marketing Representative

Hobby: Reading, Ice skating, Foraging, BASE jumping, Hiking, Skateboarding, Kayaking

Introduction: My name is Cheryll Lueilwitz, I am a sparkling, clean, super, lucky, joyous, outstanding, lucky person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.