Taking the Bible seriously, not literally (2024)

The Bible is understandably one of the most influential books in the history of humanity. Regardless ofone’s own personal religious beliefs, there is no escaping the fact that our culture, history, nation, and overall way of life has been influenced by the way that sacred book is read and interpreted. Yet, for such as profoundly influential book, it is also striking how poorly the overall contents of this ancient text are really understood.

The Bible is not a nice, clean, and perfect little manuscript that fell from heaven one day with clear, concise, and absolute instructions for human life. It is tempting to believe otherwise. In fact, for much of Christian history, believers have wanted to believe that the Bible is without error and exists as an unaltered document that came directly from God.

In reality, the Bible was written by people — a lot of people. Scholars disagree on exactly how many individual women and men actually wrote down verses that are in the Bible, but it is arguably a very large number. As these people wrote down words that would one day become enshrined in the sacred text we know of as the Bible, they were also writing largely from their own limited experience, understanding, language, culture, and perception.

Not only did people write the original words of scripture, other people also copied, translated, and transmitted those words across time. Today, no single original copy of any part of scripture is known to exist. There are several copies of copies that are very old, but no originals. Scholars also note that among the ancient copies of these sacred texts, there are occasional differences, alterations, and changes. It is believed that some people copying the words made honest mistakes, some made editorial changes, and some actually attempted to change, or at least clarify, the meaning in order to update the presumed intent of the original author.

Scripture has also been transmitted across many years, languages, and cultures. Assumptions, word meanings, and cultural perceptions have changed dramatically across time. This means that the way Scripture is read, heard, understood, and applied, also changes in tremendous ways over the course of time.

Yet, in spite of all the errors, mistakes, corrections, changes, and lost meanings that permeate the pages of the Bible, it rightfully remains a powerful testimony to God and God’s relationship with humanity — even if God is not the actual author and editor. For one thing, as the Bible says in 2 Timothy 3:16, all scripture is inspired by God. Truly, the very breath or Spirit of God fueled the creative genius of all who wrote and transmitted the sacred Word.

When God’s loving Spirit breathed into the hearts and minds of the Bible’s authors, they were inspired to write great works of theology that reflected their understandings, struggles, triumphs, and experiences with God and what it means to take our creator seriously in this world — a world often hostile to God and the life God would have us live.

This is why the Bible remains relevant. It is real people reflecting and recording real experiences with God. The inspiration comes from connecting with those who have gone before and prayerfully touching their lives through the sacred gift of the recorded word in the sacred pages. The Bible’s beauty and power comes from the authenticity with which it is written and transmitted across time, language, and culture. It may not be perfect and is certainly not without error, but it remains a powerful expression of God’s Spirit working in and through humanity. Most important, the same breath that first inspired it, breathes through those who seek to read, interpret, and live out its inspiration in and for the modern world.

Taking the Bible seriously, not literally (2024)

FAQs

Why shouldn't the Bible be taken literally? ›

Indeed, neither the Bible nor any complex document can be taken literally because words by their nature need interpretation, and most words are open to a variety of different interpretations due to their lack of specificity, multiple meanings, the many contexts in which they are used, or the numerous situations to ...

What does it mean to take the Bible seriously but not literally? ›

The Bible's beauty and power comes from the authenticity with which it is written and transmitted across time, language, and culture. It may not be perfect and is certainly not without error, but it remains a powerful expression of God's Spirit working in and through humanity.

Should the Bible be taken seriously? ›

The Bible is far too important to take literally so as people of faith we must take it seriously. The Bible says of itself that it is breathed, or inspired, by God.

What is the non literal interpretation of the Bible? ›

Since its inception, Christian theology has known the non-literal, spiritual meaning of Scripture, namely the allegorical sense (the Old Testament is a spiritual figure of the New), the moral sense (the life of Jesus is a model for the life of Christians) and the anagogic sense (the New Testament figuratively Page 4 4 ...

What percentage of people take the Bible literally? ›

Christians, who make up a majority of U.S. adults (71%), are divided over how to interpret the Bible. While about four-in-ten Christians (39%) say the Bible's text is the word of God and should be taken literally, 36% say it should not be interpreted literally or express another or no opinion.

What does not to be taken literally mean? ›

It means, “please interpret this faithfully. I am not exaggerating.” “I am so hungry I could eat a Tyrannosaurus Rex” is an expression, hyperbole, not to be taken literally.

What churches don't believe the Bible is infallible? ›

Liberal Christianity

Liberal Christians reject the dogma of inerrancy or infallibility of the Bible, which they see as the idolatry (fetishism) of the Bible.

Do evangelicals take the Bible literally? ›

Evangelicals and fundamentalists both agree that the Bible is inerrant, but fundamentalists tend to read the Bible literally. Many evangelicals don't actually read it literally.

Are there Christians who don't believe in the Bible? ›

Christian atheism takes many forms and may include an ethics system, cultural Christianity, and a variety of Christian theological positions. Prominent Christian atheist thinkers include Thomas J. J. Altizer (who said God died with Jesus), John D.

Do we really need the Bible? ›

It is absolutely necessary for the Christian to apply the Bible to his or her life, but sometimes we can make applications that are forced or unintended.

Is it wrong to worry in the Bible? ›

Philippians 4:6-7 says, “Do not be anxious about anything, but in everything by prayer and supplication with thanksgiving let your requests be made known to God. And the peace of God, which surpasses all understanding, will guard your hearts and your minds in Christ Jesus.”

Does God say we should read the Bible? ›

Wherever God's people gather, we should read the Bible. This includes, but is not limited to, open-air settings (Joshua 8:34-35, 2 Kings 23:2), synagogues (Luke 4:16-17), and local churches (Colossians 4:16). Bible reading is a mandate for kings.

Do Catholics believe in the literal interpretation of the Bible? ›

What's wrong with a literal interpretation? Some Christian communities interpret the Bible literally, an approach called “fundamentalism.” For decades the Catholic Church has denounced this approach.

What is an example of a literal sense in the Bible? ›

Huge amounts of Scripture make use of figurative language in order to get across the Literal Sense the authors want to convey. So when the prophets call Israel the “vineyard of the Lord” or Paul likens the Church to the Body of Christ, they don't mean nothing by it: they have a Literal Sense.

Which Bible translation is literal? ›

The New American Standard Bible is a literal translation from the original texts, well suited to study because of its accurate rendering of the source texts. It follows the style of the King James Version but uses modern English for words that have fallen out of use or changed their meanings.

Who wrote the Bible book? ›

In Who Really Wrote the Bible, William Schniedewind offers a bold new answer: the Bible was not written by a single author, or by a series of single authors, but by communities of scribes. The Bible does not name its authors because authorship itself was an idea enshrined in a later era by the ancient Greeks.

What is a non literal understanding of Genesis? ›

Allegorical interpretations of Genesis are readings of the biblical Book of Genesis that treat elements of the narrative as symbols or types, rather than viewing them literally as recording historical events.

What are the two ways the Bible can be understood? ›

An early monk called John Cassian (360-435) identified four ways in which the Bible could be understood: the literal, the symbolic, the ethical and the mystical.

Why isn't the Bible a scholarly source? ›

It is not a primary source for historical research or most other subject areas. A primary source is something that was written during the time period being studied, by people who witnessed the events first-hand or is the work being discussed. Examples include things like letters or diaries or works of literature.

Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Arline Emard IV

Last Updated:

Views: 6243

Rating: 4.1 / 5 (52 voted)

Reviews: 91% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Arline Emard IV

Birthday: 1996-07-10

Address: 8912 Hintz Shore, West Louie, AZ 69363-0747

Phone: +13454700762376

Job: Administration Technician

Hobby: Paintball, Horseback riding, Cycling, Running, Macrame, Playing musical instruments, Soapmaking

Introduction: My name is Arline Emard IV, I am a cheerful, gorgeous, colorful, joyous, excited, super, inquisitive person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.