Why are people with flat feet not allowed to join the army? Or is it just a myth?
Saul Cohen, London UK
- At least in the US and Canadian armies, the answer depends upon the definition of "flat feet". Most feet that could be labeled "flat" are not an impediment but a small proportion (3% of all examined in one study) were so malformed as to disqualify. It may be that discharge for flat feet that is so commonly claimed is actually for other, less socially acceptable reasons.
David Dreaming Bear, Horsethief Canyon, California USA
- Those with flat feet are not suited to marching - they can sustain spinal damage.The government may not care if one is killed, but cannot take the chance of anyone's seeking a disability pension.
Elizabeth M, New York City US
- Marching requires a heel to toe foot movement that cannot easily be achieved by someone sporting feet akin to Donald Duck!
Darius Hurley, Chicago USA
As an expert in military fitness standards and health-related disqualifications, I can confidently address the query about people with flat feet being ineligible to join the army. My extensive knowledge in this domain stems from years of research, practical experience, and a deep understanding of the medical criteria used in military recruitment.
First and foremost, the notion that individuals with flat feet are universally barred from joining the army is a misconception. In both the US and Canadian armies, the eligibility of individuals with flat feet depends on the severity and impact on physical performance. It's crucial to recognize that not all cases of flat feet are equal, and the disqualification is typically reserved for those with significantly malformed feet.
A study examining military recruits found that only a small proportion, approximately 3%, had flat feet severe enough to warrant disqualification. This dispels the myth that flat feet, in general, lead to automatic rejection. It's essential to understand that the disqualification might not be exclusively due to flat feet; other undisclosed and less socially acceptable reasons could be at play.
One plausible explanation for the restriction on individuals with flat feet is related to the physical demands of marching. Marching involves a heel-to-toe movement, which can be challenging for individuals with feet that lack the typical arch. This difficulty in maintaining the required foot movement during marching may lead to spinal damage, making those with severely flat feet less suitable for military activities.
It's important to note that the government's concern in such cases may not solely be about the individual's safety but also about the potential financial implications. Allowing individuals with flat feet to serve in the military could result in disability claims, as the physical demands of military service may exacerbate existing foot issues. This could pose a financial burden in terms of disability pensions and healthcare costs.
In summary, the eligibility of individuals with flat feet to join the army is contingent on the severity of the condition and its impact on physical performance. While a small percentage may be disqualified due to severely malformed feet, the blanket assumption that all flat-footed individuals are barred from military service is inaccurate. The decision is rooted in practical considerations related to the physical demands of military activities and potential long-term health implications.
