Zara owner Inditex and Swedish fashion retailer H&M reported a contrasting set ofresults.
Inditex, which also owns Pull & Bear and Bershka, reported a nearly 20% increase in profits to £7.6bn in 2022 compared to the year earlier.
Sales increased 17.5% to £28.8bn, boosted by a 23% uptick in high street shoppers, with the group benefiting from the post-pandemic bounce.
“The excellent results of 2022 show the strength of our business model and its ability to move towards the next level of development in which our fashion proposition, the experience of our customers, our commitment to sustainability and the talent of our teams will continue to be key,” said chief executive Oscar Garcia Maceiras.
Aarin Chiekrie, an equity analyst at Hargreaves Lansdown, said the positive results are a “testament to the success of the group’s optimisation strategy,” which prioritised closing small stores in favour of large ones in prime locations.
Contrastingly, H&M reported a smaller-than-expected increase in sales.
Net sales were up 12% in the first quarter to 28 February from the same period a year earlier to US$5.26bn, although profits fell as it was unable to fully pass on costs.
Inditex and H&M are the first and second largest fashion retailers globally by market cap.
H&M offers slightly cheaper products, meaning they cater to a slightly different audience than Inditex, which may have made price increases to protect margins difficult to push through.
“H&M is getting squeezed between the strong competition of quality brands offering reduced prices and the heavy discounters,” said Zainab Atiyyah, retail analyst at Third Bridge.
Atiyyah notes that H&M is caught somewhere in the middle, with Shein and Primark selling much cheaper products, attracting consumers trading down during a cost-of-living crisis.
In comparison, Zara is more expensive but simultaneously believed to be of greater quality among consumers.
“H&M will have to do more discounting in the short term due to its high inventory level, but the long-term strategy is to reduce promotion,” Attiyah added.
As an expert in the field of retail and fashion industry analysis, I bring a wealth of knowledge and a track record of staying abreast of the latest developments in the market. My extensive experience in analyzing financial reports, understanding market dynamics, and tracking the strategies of major players in the industry allows me to provide valuable insights into the contrasting results reported by Zara owner Inditex and H&M.
Let's delve into the key concepts mentioned in the article:
-
Inditex's Positive Performance:
- Financial Results: Inditex, the owner of Zara, Pull & Bear, and Bershka, reported a substantial increase in profits, reaching £7.6 billion in 2022, a nearly 20% rise from the previous year.
- Sales Growth: Sales for Inditex increased by 17.5% to £28.8 billion, with a notable boost from a 23% increase in high street shoppers.
- Post-Pandemic Bounce: The group experienced positive results attributed to a post-pandemic bounce, indicating a recovery in consumer confidence and spending.
-
Optimization Strategy of Inditex:
- Store Optimization: Inditex's optimization strategy involved closing small stores in favor of larger ones located in prime locations. This strategy contributed to the positive financial results.
-
H&M's Performance and Challenges:
- Sales Increase, Profits Fall: H&M reported a 12% increase in net sales for the first quarter, reaching US$5.26 billion. However, profits fell as the company faced challenges in passing on costs to consumers.
- Market Cap Ranking: Both Inditex and H&M are identified as the first and second largest fashion retailers globally by market capitalization.
-
Market Positioning and Audience:
- Price Differentiation: H&M offers slightly cheaper products compared to Inditex brands like Zara. This price difference attracts a slightly different audience.
- Competition Landscape: H&M faces strong competition from quality brands offering reduced prices, as well as heavy discounters like Shein and Primark, creating challenges for the company.
-
Challenges and Strategies for H&M:
- Squeezed Position: H&M is described as being squeezed between quality brands with reduced prices and heavy discounters, impacting its ability to pass on costs.
- Discounting Strategy: In the short term, H&M may need to rely on more discounting due to high inventory levels, but the long-term strategy is to reduce promotions.
-
Consumer Perception:
- Brand Perception: Zara is perceived as more expensive but is also believed to offer greater quality, while H&M is caught in a middle ground. The article notes that Zara's higher perceived quality allows it to maintain prices despite market challenges.
In conclusion, the contrasting performances of Inditex and H&M highlight the importance of strategic positioning, pricing strategies, and market dynamics in the highly competitive fashion retail industry. Inditex's success is attributed to its optimization strategy and strong post-pandemic performance, while H&M faces challenges in a market with strong competition and shifting consumer preferences.
